States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American climate policy

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-128

  Rabe, Barry G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Environmental policy; Federalism; Intergovernmental relations

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FEDERAL SYSTEM; INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY STRATEGY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 40149110935     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00314.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams, L. (2006). California leading the fight against global warming. Ecostates, 5 (Summer), 14-16.
2. Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (eds) (2007). Architectures for agreement: Addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
3. American Petroleum Institute. (2006). Gasoline Taxes. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Association.
4. Arrandale, T. (2007, February). A bolder Boulder. Governing, p. 56.
5. Breslau, K. (2007, April 16). The green giant. Newsweek, pp. 51-60.
6. Bushnell, J., Peterman, C. J., & Wolfram, D. (2007). California's greenhouse gas policies: Local solutions to a growing problem? Berkeley: University of California Energy Institute.
7. Carbon Control News (2007, April 10). Major bank pushes credit trading "interoperability" among GHG systems. Unsigned article in Carbon Control News.
8. Chen, C., et al. (2007). Weighing the costs and benefits of renewables portfolio standards: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
9. Congressional Budget Office (2007). Trade-offs in allocating allowances for CO2 emissions. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
10. Conlan, T., & Dinan, J. (2007). Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the transformation of American conservatism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(3), 279-303.
11. Dernbach, J., & the Widener University Law School Seminar on Energy Efficiency. (2007). Stabilizing and then reducing U.S. energy consumption: Legal and policy tools for efficiency and conservation. Environmental Law Reporter, 37 (January), 10003-10031.
12. Dobesova, K., Apt, J., & Lave, L. B. (2005). Are renewable portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy? Environmental Science and Technology, 39(22), 8578-8583.
13. Fiorino, D. J. (2006). The new environmental regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2007). "Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation, "Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 04-05.
15. Hoffman, A. J. (2006). Getting ahead of the curve: Corporate strategies that address climate change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
16. Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J., & Sadownik, B. (2002). The cost of climate policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
17. Jones, C. O. (1975). Clean air: The policies and politics of pollution control. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
18. Kamieniecki, S. (2006). Corporate America and environmental policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19. Layzer, J. A. (2007). Deep freeze: How business has shaped the global warming debate in Congress. In M.E. Kraft, & S. Kamieniecki (Eds.), Business and environmental policy (pp. 93-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2006). The broken branch: How Congress is failing America and how to get it back on track. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Manna, P. (2006). School's in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
22. Mazmanian, D. A., & Kraft, M. E. (Eds.) (2008). Toward sustainable communities (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. McKibbin, W. J., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (2002). Climate change policy after Kyoto: Blueprint for a realistic approach. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24. Montpetit, E. (2003). Misplaced distrust: Policy networks and the environment in France, the United States, and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
25. Nivola, P. S. (2002). Tense commandments: Federal prescriptions and city problems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Petersen, J. E. (2007, March). Fueling a tax. Governing, p. 66.
27. Pew Center on Global Climate Change. (2007). Climate Change 101: Understanding and Responding to Global Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
28. Posner, P. L. (2005). The politics of preemption: Prospects for the states. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(3), 371-374.
29. Rabe, B. G. (2004). Statehouse and Greenhouse: The emerging politics of American climate change policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30. Rabe, B. G. (2007a). Environmental policy and the Bush Era: The collision between the administrative presidency and state experimentation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37 (3), 413-431.
31. Rabe, B. G. (2007b). "Can Congress govern the climate?" Research Brief for the Legislating for the Future Project, New York University and Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu.
32. Rabe, B. G. (in press). Regionalism and global climate change policy: Revisiting multi-state collaboration as an intergovernmental management tool. In T. Conlan & P. Posner (Eds.), Intergovernmental management in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Brookings.
33. Rabe, B. G., & Mundo, P. A. (2007). Business influence in state-level environmental policy. In M. E. Kraft & S. Kamieniecki (Eds.), Business and environmental policy (pp. 265-297). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Repetto, R. (Ed.) (2006). Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Resource Renewal Institute. (2001). State of the states. San Francisco: Resource Renewal Institute.
36. Rowlands, I. H. (2007). The development of renewable electricity policy in the Province of Ontario: The influence of ideas and timing. Review of Policy Research, 24(3), 185-207.
37. Scheberle, D. (2004). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38. Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. (2007). Political science and prediction: What's next for U.S. climate change policy? Review of Policy Research, 24(1), 1-27.
39. Stewart, R. B., & Wiener, J. B. (2003). Reconstructing climate policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
40. Teske, P. (2004). Regulation in the states. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41. "U.S. consumers, companies feeling green." (2007). Reuters, January 28.
42. Victor, D. G. (2004). The collapse of the Kyoto protocol and the struggle to stop global warming (Rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. World Resources Institute. (2007). Climate policy in the state laboratory: How states influence federal regulation and the implications for climate change policy in the U.S. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
45. Zimmerman, J. F. (2007). Congressional preemption during the George W. Bush Administration, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(3), 432-452.