The modified Cassie's equation and contact angle hysteresis

Colloid and Polymer Science

Volumn 291, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 299-306

  Xu, Xianmin ^a   Wang, Xiaoping ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Homogenization; The Cassie's equation; Wetting hysteresis

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; EFFECTIVE CONTACT; EQUILIBRIUM STATE; HOMOGENIZATION; HOMOGENIZATION APPROACH; PATTERNED SURFACE; STATIC CONTACT ANGLE; THE CASSIE'S EQUATION;

HYSTERESIS; WETTING;

CONTACT ANGLE;

ARTICLE; CASSIE EQUATION; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; HYSTERESIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84878373442     PISSN: 0303402X     EISSN: 14351536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2748-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alberti G, DeSimone A (2005) Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach. Proc R Soc A 451:79-97
2. Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, Meunier J, Rolley E (2009) Wetting and spreading. Rev Mod Phys 81:739-805
3. Bormashenko E (2009) A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon? Langmuir 25(18):10451-10454
4. Cassie A, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546-551
5. Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh M, Öner D, Youngblood J, McCarthy TJ (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395-3399
6. Dimitrov DI, Milchev A, Binder K (2010) Method for wettability characterization based on contact line pinning. Phys Rev E 81:04163
7. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762-3765
8. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) Reply to "Comment on How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy". Langmuir 23:13243-13243
9. de Gennes PG (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827863
10. de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quere D 2003 Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, Berlin
11. Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis. III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surfaces. J Phys Chem 68:1744-1750
12. Marmur A, Bittoun E (2009) When Wenzel and Cassie are right: reconciling local and global considerations. Langmuir 25:1277-1281
13. Mchale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong. Langmuir 23:8200-8205
14. Mognetti BM, Yeomans JM (2009) Modeling receding contact lines on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26:18162-18168
15. Panchagnula MV, Vedantam S (2007) Comment on how Wenzel and Cassie were wrong by Gao and McCarthy. Langmuir 23:13242-13242
16. Schwartz LW, Garoff S (1985) Contact angle hysteresis on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 1:219-230
17. Turco A, Alouges F, DeSimone A (2009) Wetting on rough surfaces and contact angle hysteresis: numerical experiments based on a phase field model. M2AN 43:1027-1044
18. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988994
19. Whyman G, Bormashenko E, Stein T (2008) The rigorous derivative of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon. Chem Phys Lett 450:355-359
20. Wolansky G, Marmur A (1999) Apparent contact angles on rough surfaces: the Wenzel equation revisited. Colloids Surf A 156:381-388
21. Xu X, Wang X-P (2010) Derivation of Wenzel's and Cassie's equations froma phase fieeld model for two phase flow on rough surface. SIAM J Appl Math 70:2929-2941
22. Xu X, Wang X-P (2011) Analysis of wetting and contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned surfaces. SIAM J Appl Math 71:1753-1779
23. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:6587