Coupled particulate and continuum model for nanoparticle targeted delivery

Computers and Structures

Volumn 122, Issue , 2013, Pages 128-134

  Tan, Jifu ^a   Wang, Shunqiang ^a   Yang, Jie ^a,b   Liu, Yaling ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

^b SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adhesion kinetics; Brownian dynamics; Convection diffusion reaction model; Nanoparticle; Particulate continuum coupled model

Indexed keywords

BINS; BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; DYNAMICS; HEAT CONVECTION; LIGANDS; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; REACTION KINETICS; REACTION RATES; SHEAR FLOW;

ADHESION KINETICS; ANALYTICAL FORMULAS; BROWNIAN DYNAMICS; CONVECTION-DIFFUSION-REACTION MODELS; COUPLED MODELING; EVALUATION AND PREDICTIONS; LIGAND-RECEPTOR BINDING; TRANSPORT PHENOMENA;

ADHESION;

EID: 84878359213     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Sanhai WR et al. Seven challenges for nanomedicine. Nat Nano 2008; 3(5):242-4. (Pubitemid 351668048)
2. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med 2012; 63(1):185-98.
3. Jain RK, Stylianopoulos T. Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010; 7(11):653-64.
4. Simone EA, Dziubla TD, Muzykantov VR Polymeric carriers: role of geometry in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Delivery 2008; 5(12):1283-300.
5. Decuzzi P et al. Size and shape effects in the biodistribution of intravascularly injected particles. J Controlled Release 2010; 141(3):320-7.
6. Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E. Organ targeting In vivo using phage display peptide libraries. Nature 1996; 380(6572):364-6. (Pubitemid 26097120)
7. Liu Y et al. The shape of things to come: importance of design in nanotechnology for drug delivery. Ther Delivery 2012; 3(2):181-94.
8. Arifin DY, Lee LY, Wang C-H. Mathematical modeling and simulation of drug release from microspheres: implications to drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2006; 58(12-13):1274-325.
9. Grief AD, Richardson G. Mathematical modelling of magnetically targeted drug delivery. J Magn Magn Mater 2005; 293(1):455-63. (Pubitemid 40608966)
10. Shah S, Liu Y. Modeling particle shape-dependent dynamics in nanomedicine. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011; 11(2):919-28.
11. Glaser RW. Antigen-antibody binding and mass transport by convection and diffusion to a surface. Anal Biochem 1993; 213(1):152-61.
12. Frieboes H et al. Nanotechnology in cancer drug therapy: a biocomputational approach 2006:435-60.
13. Bell G. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 1978; 200(4342):618-27.
14. Evans EA. Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. II. Discrete kinetically trapped molecular cross-bridges. Biophys J 1985; 48(1):185-92.
15. Haun JB, Hammer DA Quantifying nanoparticle adhesion mediated by specific molecular interactions. Langmuir 2008; 24(16):8821-32.
16. Decuzzi P, Ferrari M. The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. Biomaterials 2006; 27(30):5307-14. (Pubitemid 44080296)
17. Gentile F, Granaldi A, Ferrari M., Decuzzi P. On the Adhesion of Particles to a Cell Layer Under Flow, ENS'06, Paris, France: 2006.
18. Tan J, Thomas A, Liu Y. Influence of red blood cells on nanoparticle targeted delivery in microcirculation. Soft Matter 2012; 8(6).
19. Prabhakarpandian B et al. Synthetic microvascular networks for quantitative analysis of particle adhesion. Biomed Microdevices 2008; 10(4):585-95.
20. Bell GI, Dembo M, Bongrand P. Cell adhesion. Competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding. Biophys J 1984; 45(6):1051-64. (Pubitemid 14099481)
21. Dembo M et al. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc Royal Soc London. Ser B Biol Sci 1988; 234(1274):55-83.
22. Cozens-Roberts C., Lauffenburger DA, Quinn JA Receptor-mediated cell attachment and detachment kinetics. I. Probabilistic model and analysis. Biophys J 1990; 58(4):841-56. (Pubitemid 20307854)
23. Liu J et al. Computational model for nanocarrier binding to endothelium validated using in vivo, in vitro, and atomic force microscopy experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107(38):16530-5.
24. N'Dri N.A., Shyy W, Tran-Son-Tay R. Computational modeling of cell adhesion and movement using a continuum-kinetics approach. Biophys J 2003; 85(4):2273-86. (Pubitemid 37210778)
25. Fogelson AL, Guy RD Immersed-boundary-type models of intravascular platelet aggregation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2008; 197(25-28):2087-104. (Pubitemid 351509247)
26. Lutters BCH et al. Blocking endothelial adhesion molecules: a potential therapeutic strategy to combat atherogenesis. Curr Opin Lipidol 2004; 15(5):545-52. (Pubitemid 39336582)
27. Ermak DL, Mccammon JA Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J Chem Phys 1978; 69(4):1352-60.
28. Li A, Ahmadi G. Dispersion and deposition of spherical-particles from point sources in a turbulent channel flow. Aerosol Sci Technol 1992; 16(4):209-26.
29. Einstein A. Investigations on the theory of Brownian movement. In: Fürth R, editor. New York: Dover Publ.; 1956. Translated by A.D. Cowper (1926, reprinted 1956).
30. Mori N, Kumagae M, Nakamura K. Brownian dynamics simulation for suspensions of oblong-particles under shear flow. Rheol Acta 1998; 37(2): 151-7. (Pubitemid 128596813)
31. Berthier J, Silberzan P. Microfluidics for biotechnology. Artech House 2005. 374.
32. Won J et al. Diffusion of spheres in entangled polymer solutions: a return to stokes-einstein behavior. Macromolecules 1994; 27(25):7389-96.
33. Silberzan JBaP. Microfluidics for biotechnology. Artech house microelectro-mechanical systems series. Microelectromech Sys Ser 2006.
34. Kwon HJ, Bradfield CK, Dodge B.T., Agoki GS Study of simultaneous fluid and mass adsorption model in the QCM-D sensor for characterization of biomolecular interactions. In: Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference. Boston: 2009.
35. Doshi N et al. Flow and adhesion of drug carriers in blood vessels depend on their shape: a study using model synthetic microvascular networks. J Controlled Release 2010; 146(2):196-200.
36. Ward MD, Hammer DA A theoretical-analysis for the effect of focal contact formation on cell-substrate attachment strength. Biophys J 1993; 64(3):936-59. (Pubitemid 23130362)