The Jade Goody Effect: Whose cervical screening decisions were influenced by her story?

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 184-188

  Marlow, Laura A V ^a   Sangha, Amrit ^a   Patnick, Julietta ^b   Waller, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WALES;

EID: 84878336061     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jms.2012.012095     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ONS Statistical Bulletin. Cancer Registrations in England, 2010. 2012. See http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_263537.pdf (last checked 10 July 2012)
2. Sasieni P, Castanon A, Louie K S (eds). NHSCAP Audit of invasive cervical cancer: National report 2007-2010. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmers, 2011
3. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004;364:249-256
4. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. NHS Cervical Screening Programme Report 2010/2011. 2011
5. Lancucki L, Sasieni P, Patnick J, Day T, Vessey M. The impact of Jade Goody's diagnosis and death on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. J Med Screen 2012;19:89-93
6. Hilton S, Hunt K. Coverage of Jade Goody's cervical cancer in UK newspapers: a missed opportunity for health promotion? BMC Public Health 2010;10:368
7. Metcalfe D, Price C, Powell J. Media coverage and public reaction to a celebrity cancer diagnosis. J Public Health (Oxf) 2011;33:80-85
8. Bell L, Seale C. The reporting of cervical cancer in the mass media: a study of UK newspapers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2011;20:389-394
9. MacArthur GJ, Wright M, Beer H, Paranjothy S. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme. J Med Screen 2011;18:204-209
10. ONS. Cancer statistics registrations, England, Edition MB1 40, 2009. London: ONS, 2011. See http://tinyurl.com/cancerstatistics2009 (last checked 10 July 2012)
11. Lancuck L, Patnick J, Vessey M. A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage? J Med Screen 2008;15:27-29
12. Chapman S, McLeod K, Wakefield M, Holding S. Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue's breast cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust 2005;183:247-250
13. Lane DS, Polednak AP, Burg MA. The impact of media coverage of Nancy Reagan's experience on breast cancer screening. Am J Public Health 1989;79:1551-1552
14. Howe A, Owen-Smith V, Richardson J. The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England. J Public Health Med 2002;24:299-304
15. Richardson J, Owen-Smith V, Howe A. The effect of 'Alma's' death on women attending for a cervical smear: a questionnaire survey. J Public Health Med 2002;24:305-306
16. Sutton S, Rutherford C. Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:2460-2465
17. Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 2009;338:b2025
18. Green MC. Narratives and cancer communication. J Commun 2006;56:S163-S183
19. Hinyard LJ, Kreuter MW. Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Educ Behav 2007;34:777-792
20. Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med 2007;33:221-235
21. Slater MD, Buller DB, Waters E, Archibeque M, LeBlanc M. A test of conversational and testimonial messages versus didactic presentations of nutrition information. J Nutr Educ Behav 2003;35:255-259
22. Meier E, Moy C. Social grading and the census. Int J Market Res 2004;46:141-170
23. Franceschi S, Plummer M, Clifford G, et al. Differences in the risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection by education level. Br J Cancer 2009;101:865-870
24. Ibfelt E, Kjaer SK, Johansen C, et al. Socioeconomic position and stage of cervical cancer in Danish women diagnosed 2005 to 2009. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:835-842
25. von WC, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J. Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev 2011;33:135-147
26. Kreuter MW, Holmes K, Alcaraz K, et al. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81:S6-14
27. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ 2008;337:a1591
28. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability - Heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cog Psychol 1973;5:207-232