Named Entity Recognition: Fallacies, challenges and opportunities

Computer Standards and Interfaces

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 482-489

  Marrero, Mónica ^a   Urbano, Julián ^a   Sánchez Cuadrado, Sonia ^a   Morato, Jorge ^a   Gómez Berbís, Juan Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evaluation methodology; Information Extraction; Named Entity; Named Entity Recognition; NER tools

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; NAMED ENTITIES; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; POINT OF VIEWS;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER); SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84878302542     PISSN: 09205489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2012.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. R. Grishman, and B. Sundheim Message understanding conference-6: a brief history 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics 1996 466 471
2. O. Borrega, M. Taulé, and M.A. Martí What do we mean when we speak about Named Entities Conference on Corpus Linguistics 2007
3. H. Cunningham Information Extraction, automatic Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd ed. 2005 Elsevier 665 677
4. J. Gantz, and D. Reinsel The Digital Universe Decade, Are You Ready? 2010
5. V. Uren Semantic annotation for knowledge management: requirements and a survey of the state of the art Journal of Web Semantics 4 1 2006 14 28
6. L. Reeve, and H. Han Survey of semantic annotation platforms Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC '05 2005 ACM Press, New York New York, USA 1634
7. R. Srihari, and W. Li Information extraction supported question answering 8th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), no. 500 2000 185 196
8. L.M.Á. Sabucedo, L.E.A. Rifón, R.M. Pérez, and J.M.S. Gago Providing standard-oriented data models and interfaces to eGovernment services: a semantic-driven approach Computer Standards & Interfaces 31 5 2009 1014 1027
9. H.N. Talantikitea, D. Aissanib, and N. Boudjlidac Semantic annotations for web services discovery and composition Computer Standards & Interfaces 31 6 2009 1108 1117
10. A. Maedche, and S. Staab Ontology learning for the semantic web IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 2 2001 72 79
11. O. Etzioni Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: an experimental study Artificial Intelligence 165 1 2005 91
12. B. Pang, and L. Lee Opinion mining and sentiment analysis Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2 1-2 2008 1 135
13. A.M. Popescu, and O. Etzioni Extracting product features and opinions from reviews Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP vol. 5 2005 339 346
14. N. Chinchor, and P. Robinson MUC-7 named entity task definition 7th Conference on Message Understanding 1997
15. a Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications 1991 29 32
16. G. Petasis, A. Cucchiarelli, P. Velardi, G. Paliouras, V. Karkaletsis, and C.D. Spyropoulos Automatic adaptation of Proper Noun Dictionaries through cooperation of machine learning and probabilistic methods 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2000 128 135
17. E. Alfonseca, and S. Manandhar An unsupervised method for general named entity recognition and automated concept discovery 1st International Conference on General WordNet 2002
18. A. Brunstein Annotation Guidelines for Answer Types 2002
19. Jd. Kim, T. Ohta, Y. Teteisi, and J. Tsujii GENIA corpus: a semantically annotated corpus for bio-text mining Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19 1 2003 180
20. D. Nadeau, and S. Sekine A survey of named entity recognition and classification Linguisticae Investigationes 30 7 2007
21. D. Nadeau Semi-Supervised Named Entity Recognition: Learning to Recognize 100 Entity Types with Little Supervision 2007 Department of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa
22. S.A. Kripke Naming and Necessity 1980 Harvard University Press
23. E.F.T.K. Sang, and F.D. Meulder Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition CoNLL-2003 2003 142 147
24. NIST Automatic Content Extraction Evaluation (ACE08). Official Results 2008
25. G. Demartini, T. Iofciu, and A.D. Vries Overview of the INEX 2009 entity ranking track S. Geva, J. Kamps, A. Trotman, INEX 2009 Workshop Pre-proceedings 2009 IR Publications Amsterdam 233 237
26. K. Balog, P. Serdyukov, and A.D. Vries Overview of the TREC 2010 Entity Track Proc. TREC'10 2010
27. H. Ji, and R. Grishman Knowledge base population: successful approaches and challenges Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2011 1148 1158
28. K. Balog, P. Serdyukov, and A.P. de Vries Overview of the TREC 2010 Entity Track Text REtrieval Conference 2010
29. M. Marrero, S. Sanchez-Cuadrado, J. Urbano, J. Morato, and J.A. Moreiro Information Retrieval Systems Adapted to the Biomedical Domain 2012 ACM Computing Research Repository
30. J. LaPorte Rigid Designators E.N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011
31. S. Sekine, and C. Nobata Definition, dictionaries and tagger for extended named entity hierarchy Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) 2004 1977 1980
32. Y. Shinyama, and S. Sekine Named entity discovery using comparable news articles International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING) 2004 848 853
33. M. Marrero, S. Sánchez-Cuadrado, J. Morato Lara, and Y. Andreadakis Evaluation of Named Entity Extraction systems 10th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing '09) 2009
34. J. Katzer, K.H. Cook, and W.W. Crouch Evaluating Information: a Guide for Users of Social Science Research 4th ed. 1998 McGraw-Hill
35. M.L. Mitchell, and J.M. Jolley Research Design Explained 7th ed. 2009 Wadsworth Publishing
36. J. Urbano Information retrieval meta-evaluation: challenges and opportunities in the music domain International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference 2011 609 614
37. E.M. Voorhees The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum 2002 355 370
38. M. Vilain, J. Su, and S. Lubar Entity extraction is a boring solved problem: or is it? Human Language Technologies: the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2007 181 184
39. T. Poibeau, and L. Kosseim Proper name extraction from non-journalistic texts Language and Computers 37 2001 144 157
40. R. Gaizauskas, G. Demetriou, P. Artymiuk, and P. Willet Protein structures and information extraction from biological texts: the Pasta system Bioinformatics 19 1 2003 135 143
41. G. Doddington, A. Mitchell, M. Przybocki, L. Ramshaw, S. Strassel, and R. Weischedel The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) Program -Tasks, Data and Evaluation Proc. Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2004
42. K. Balog, A.D. Vries, P. Serdyukov, P. Thomas, and T. Westerveld Overview of the TREC 2009 entity track The Eighteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2009) 2009
43. J. Zobel, A. Moffat, and L.A.F. Park Against recall: is it persistence, cardinality, density, coverage, or totality? ACM SIGIR Forum 2009