Entity extraction is a boring solved problem - Or is it?

NAACL-HLT 2007 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 181-184

  Vilain, Marc ^a   Su, Jennifer ^b   Lubar, Suzi ^a  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS; DATA SET; ENTITY EXTRACTIONS; POOR PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH CHALLENGES; RESEARCH SYSTEM;

EXTRACTION;

EID: 84867084803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Finkel J R, Grenager T, Manning C (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling, Proc ACL, Ann Arbor.
2. Florian R, Ittycheriah A, Jing H, Zhang T (2003). Named entity recognition through classifier combination, Proc CoNLL, Edmonton.
3. Ji H, Grishman R (2005). Improving name tagging by reference resolution and relation detection, Proc ACL.
4. Kosseim L, Poibeau T (2001). Extraction de noms propres à partir de textes variés. Proc. TALN, Toulouse.
5. Mikheev A, Moens M, Grover C (1999). Named entity recognition without gazetteers. Proc. EACL, Bergen.
6. Minkov E, Wang R, Cohen W (2005). Extracting personal names from email. Proc HLT/EMNLP, Vancouver.
7. Mohit B, Hwa R (2005) Syntax-based semi-supervised named entity tagging. Proc ACL, Ann Arbor MI.
8. Sundheim B (1995), ed. Proc MUC-6, Columbia MD.
9. Sutton C, McCallum A (2005). Composition of CRFs for transfer learning, Proc HLT/EMNLP, Vancouver.