Incremental value of multiplanar cross-referencing for prostate cancer staging with endorectal MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 99-104

  Wang, Liang ^a   Zhang, Jingbo ^a   Schwartz, Lawrence H ^a   Eisenberg, Halley ^a   Ishill, Nicole M ^a   Moskowitz, Chaya S ^a   Scardino, Peter ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital imaging; MR coils; MRI; Neoplasms; Oncologic imaging; PACS; Prostate; Tumor staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845781090     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1783     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:10-30
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2005. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2005. Publication no. 5008.05
3. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics, 1993. CA Cancer J Clin 1993; 43:7-26
4. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002; 167:528-534
5. Catalona WJ, Ramos CG, Carvalhal GF. Contemporary results of anatomic radical prostatectomy. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49:282-296
6. Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC, et al. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 2004; 100:2655-2663
7. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 2004; 171:1844-1849
8. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson ID. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001; 58:843-848
9. Koh H, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al. A nomogram to predict seminal vesicle invasion by the extent and location of cancer in systematic biopsy results. J Urol 2003; 170:1203-1208
10. Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 2004; 232:133-139
11. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L, Chen HN, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232:140-146
12. Cornud F, Flam T, Chauveinc L, et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 2002; 224:203-210
13. Rajesh A, Coakley FV. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004; 12:557-579
14. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO. Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2294-2302
15. Wallner K. MR imaging for prostate cancer staging: beauty or beast? Int J Radiol Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52:886-887
16. Sonnad SS, Langlotz CP, Schwartz JS. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:149-157
17. May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P, Hartung R, Breul I. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2001; 87:66-69
18. Gray H, Lewis WH. Anatomy of the human body, 20th ed. Available at: www.bartleby.com. Accessed August 31, 2005
19. Coakley FV, Hricak H. Radiologic anatomy of the prostate gland: a clinical approach. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:15-30
20. Gonzalez Ballester MA, Zisserman AP, Brady M. Estimation of thepartial volume effect in MRI. Med Image Anal 2002; 6:389-405
21. Maeda M, Suzuki E, Yoshiya K, et al. Partial volume effect in MRI: a phantom study [in Japanese]. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1989; 49:1404-1410
22. Miyamoto K, Abe S, Kawakami Y. Picture archiving and communication system in Hokkaido University Hospital: advantage and disadvantage of HU-PACS chest roentgenogram images in the outpatient clinic. J Digit Imaging 1991; 4:28-31
23. De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, De Keulenaer BL. Picture archiving and communication system. Part 1. Filmless radiology and distance radiology. JBR-BTR 2004; 87:234-241
24. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Paulson EK, et al. PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display-picture archiving and communication systems. AJR 1999; 173:1175-1179
25. Claus FG, Hricak H, Hattery RR. Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: role of MR imaging and IH MR spectroscopy. RadioGraphics 2004; 24[suppl 1]:S167-S180
26. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-845
27. Cicchetti DV, Fleiss JL. A new procedure for assessing reliability if scoring EEG sleep recordings. Am J EEG Technol 1977; 11:101-109
28. D'Amico AV, Renshaw AA, Sussman B, Chen MH. Pretreatment PSA velocity and risk of death from prostate cancer following external beam radiation therapy. JAMA 2005; 294:440-447
29. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Potter SR, Walsh PC. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. Urology 2000; 56:283-288
30. Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: comparison between fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin echo and three-dimensional dual-echo, steady-state sequences. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:236-241
31. Rorvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Albrektsen G, Ersland L, Daehlin L, Haukaas S. MRI with an endorectal coil for staging of clinically localised prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:29-34
32. Tempany CM. MR staging of prostate cancer: how we can improve our accuracy with decisions aids and optimal techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1996; 4:519-532
33. Futterer JJ, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ, et al. Initial experience of 3 tesla endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H-spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:671-680
34. Sosna J, Pedrosa I, Dewolf WC, Mahallati H, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:857-862