Symptom selection for multi-label data of inquiry diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine

Science China Information Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1-13

  Shao, Huan ^a   Li, GuoZheng ^b   Liu, GuoPing ^c   Wang, YiQin ^c  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

coronary heart disease; feature selection; high dimensionality; inquiry of traditional Chinese medicine; multi label learning

Indexed keywords

CORONARY HEART DISEASE; DIMENSION REDUCTION ALGORITHM; EMBEDDED FEATURE SELECTIONS; GENERALIZATION PERFORMANCE; HIGH DIMENSIONALITY; MULTI-LABEL LEARNING; TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE; TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE (TCM) DIAGNOSIS;

CARDIOLOGY; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84878267102     PISSN: 1674733X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-011-4406-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tian L, Yan Y J, Zhu J G. Data mining techniques and their application in TCM study (in Chinese). Chinese J Basic Med Trad Chin Med, 2005, 11: 710-712.
2. Tsousmakas G, Zhang M L, Zhou Z H. Learning from multi-label data. In: Tutorial at ECML/PKDD'09 Bled, Slovenia, 2009.
3. Zhang Y, Zhou Z H. Multi-label dimensionality reduction via dependence maximization. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data, 2010, 4(3): Article No. 14.
4. Yu K, Yu S P, Tresp V. Multi-label informed latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2005. 258-265.
5. Ji S W, Ye J P. Linear dimensionality reduction for multi-label classification. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, CA, 2009. 1077-1082.
6. Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res, 2003, 3: 1157-1182.
7. Ge L, Li G Z, You M Y. Embedded feature selection for multi-label learning (in Chinese). J Nanjing Univ (Nat Sci), 2009, 45: 671-676.
8. Moody J, Utans J. Principled architecture selection for neural networks: Application to corporate bond rating prediction. In: Moody J E, Hanson S J, Lippmann P R, eds. Neural Information Processing Systems 4. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, 1992. 683-690.
9. Zhang M L, Pena J M, Robles V, et al. Feature selection for multi-label naive Bayes classification. Inf Sci, 2009, 179: 3218-3229.
10. Li G C, Li C T, Huang LP, et al. An investigation into regularity of syndrome classification for chronic atrophic gastritis based on structural equation model (in Chinese). J Nanjing Univ Trad Chin Med, 2006, 22: 217-220.
11. Wang X W, Qu H B, Wang J. A quantitative diagnostic method based on data-mining approach in TCM (in Chinese). J Beijing Univ Trad Chin Med, 2005, 28: 4-7.
12. Liu G P, Li G Z, Wang Y L, et al. Modeling of inquiry diagnosis for coronary heart disease in traditional Chinese medicine by using multi-label learning. BMC Complem Altern Med, 2010, 10: 37.
13. Gheyas I A, Smith L S. Feature subset selection in large dimensionality domains. Patt Recogn, 2010, 43: 5-13.
14. Blickle T, Thiele L. A comparison of selection schemes used in evolutionary algorithms. Evolut Comput, 1996, 4: 361-394.
15. Motoki T. Calculating the expected loss of diversity of selection schemes. Evolut Comput, 2002, 10: 397-422.
16. Sokolov A, Whitley D. Unbiased tournament selection. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Washington DC: ACM, 2005. 1131-1138.
17. Zhang M L, Zhou Z H. ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Patt Recog, 2007, 40: 2038-2048.
18. Zhang M L, Zhou Z H. Multilabel neural networks with applications to functional genomics and text categorization. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2006, 18: 1338-1351.
19. Elisseeff A, Weston J. A kernel method for multi-labelled classification. Adv Neur Inf Process Syst, 2002, 14: 681-687.
20. Ronen M, Jacob Z. Using simulated annealing to optimize feature selection problem in marketing applications. Europ J Oper Res, 2006, 171: 842-858.
21. Yang J, Honavar V. Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Intell Syst Appl, 1998, 13: 44-49.
22. Pudil P, Novovicov J, Kittler J, et al. Floating search methods in feature selection. Patt Recog Lett, 1994, 15: 1119-1125.