-
1
-
-
0032732141
-
Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection
-
Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:554-559.
-
(1999)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.189
, pp. 554-559
-
-
Alves, A.1
Panis, Y.2
Pocard, M.3
Regimbeau, J.M.4
Valleur, P.5
-
2
-
-
44749085251
-
Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery
-
Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:902-908.
-
(2008)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.51
, pp. 902-908
-
-
Jung, S.H.1
Yu, C.S.2
Choi, P.W.3
-
3
-
-
34250183826
-
Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy
-
Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:8-15.
-
(2007)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.11
, pp. 8-15
-
-
Law, W.L.1
Choi, H.K.2
Lee, Y.M.3
Ho, J.W.4
Seto, C.L.5
-
4
-
-
0035676623
-
Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery
-
Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1157-1168.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 1157-1168
-
-
Bruce, J.1
Zh, K.2
Al-Khairy, G.3
Russell, E.M.4
Park, K.G.5
-
5
-
-
84872605087
-
-
Available at American College of Surgeons. Accessed June 16, 2012
-
Join Leading Hospitals in CMS National Surgical Quality Pilot. 2012. Available at: http://www.facs.org/hospitalcompare/index.html. American College of Surgeons. Accessed June 16, 2012.
-
(2012)
Join Leading Hospitals in CMS National Surgical Quality Pilot
-
-
-
6
-
-
54049129964
-
Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National surgical quality improvement program
-
Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777-782.
-
(2008)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.207
, pp. 777-782
-
-
Birkmeyer, J.D.1
Shahian, D.M.2
Dimick, J.B.3
-
7
-
-
71149089183
-
Design and statistical methodology of the national surgical quality improvement program: Why is it what it is?
-
Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009;198(5 Suppl):S19-S27.
-
(2009)
Am J Surg
, vol.198
, Issue.5 SUPPL.
-
-
Henderson, W.G.1
Daley, J.2
-
10
-
-
57849156436
-
Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: What does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality?
-
Hyman NH, Osler T, Cataldo P, Burns EH, Shackford SR. Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: what does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:48-52.
-
(2009)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.208
, pp. 48-52
-
-
Hyman, N.H.1
Osler, T.2
Cataldo, P.3
Burns, E.H.4
Shackford, S.R.5
-
11
-
-
33846404130
-
Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: It's later than you think
-
Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007;245:254-258.
-
(2007)
Ann Surg
, vol.245
, pp. 254-258
-
-
Hyman, N.1
Manchester, T.L.2
Osler, T.3
Burns, B.4
Cataldo, P.A.5
-
12
-
-
54349102309
-
Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer
-
Iancu C, Mocan LC, Todea-Iancu D, et al. Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17:299-303.
-
(2008)
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis
, vol.17
, pp. 299-303
-
-
Iancu, C.1
Mocan, L.C.2
Todea-Iancu, D.3
-
13
-
-
33845288327
-
The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery
-
Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:71-79.
-
(2007)
Colorectal Dis
, vol.9
, pp. 71-79
-
-
Platell, C.1
Barwood, N.2
Dorfmann, G.3
Makin, G.4
-
14
-
-
0031886633
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
-
Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355-358.
-
(1998)
Br J Surg
, vol.85
, pp. 355-358
-
-
Rullier, E.1
Laurent, C.2
Garrelon, J.L.3
Michel, P.4
Saric, J.5
Parneix, M.6
-
15
-
-
77951491592
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: A case-control study
-
Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM. Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg. 2010;145:371-376.
-
(2010)
Arch Surg
, vol.145
, pp. 371-376
-
-
Telem, D.A.1
Chin, E.H.2
Nguyen, S.Q.3
Divino, C.M.4
-
16
-
-
0034075212
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision
-
Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92-96.
-
(2000)
Am J Surg
, vol.179
, pp. 92-96
-
-
Law, W.I.1
Chu, K.W.2
Ho, J.W.3
Chan, C.W.4
-
17
-
-
80054925814
-
How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution
-
Cima RR, Lackore KA, Nehring SA, et al. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. Surgery. 2011;150: 943-949.
-
(2011)
Surgery
, vol.150
, pp. 943-949
-
-
Cima, R.R.1
Lackore, K.A.2
Nehring, S.A.3
-
18
-
-
84862812352
-
What are the real rates of postoperative complications: Elucidating inconsistencies between administrative and clinical data sources
-
Koch CG, Li L, Hixson E, Tang A, Phillips S, Henderson JM. What are the real rates of postoperative complications: elucidating inconsistencies between administrative and clinical data sources. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:798-805.
-
(2012)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.214
, pp. 798-805
-
-
Koch, C.G.1
Li, L.2
Hixson, E.3
Tang, A.4
Phillips, S.5
Henderson, J.M.6
-
19
-
-
51449104585
-
Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement
-
Steinberg SM, Popa MR, Michalek JA, Bethel MJ, Ellison EC. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement. Surgery. 2008;144:662-667.
-
(2008)
Surgery
, vol.144
, pp. 662-667
-
-
Steinberg, S.M.1
Popa, M.R.2
Michalek, J.A.3
Bethel, M.J.4
Ellison, E.C.5
-
20
-
-
83555163675
-
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: Do they accurately identify true safety events?
-
Rosen AK, Itani KM, Cevasco M, et al. Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events? Med Care. 2012;50:74-85.
-
(2012)
Med Care
, vol.50
, pp. 74-85
-
-
Rosen, A.K.1
Itani, K.M.2
Cevasco, M.3
-
21
-
-
68949198751
-
Prospective study of coding practices for cesarean deliveries
-
Chescheir N, Meints L. Prospective study of coding practices for cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 pt 1):217-223.
-
(2009)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.114
, Issue.2 PART 1
, pp. 217-223
-
-
Chescheir, N.1
Meints, L.2
|