Verb classification using distributional similarity in syntactic and semantic structures

50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 263-272

  Croce, Danilo ^a   Moschitti, Alessandro ^b   Basili, Roberto ^a   Palmer, Martha ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; DISTRIBUTIONAL SIMILARITIES; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GRAMMATICAL INFORMATION; LINGUISTIC THEORY; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; SIMILARITY FUNCTIONS; SYNTACTIC PROPERTIES;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DESIGN; SEMANTICS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84878191112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The berkeley framenet project.
2. Marco Baroni, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi, and Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. LRE, 43(3):209-226.
3. Stephan Bloehdorn and Alessandro Moschitti. 2007a. Combined syntactic and semantic kernels for text classification. In Gianni Amati, Claudio Carpineto, and Gianni Romano, editors, Proceedings of ECIR, volume 4425 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 307-318. Springer, APR.
4. Stephan Bloehdorn and Alessandro Moschitti. 2007b. Structure and semantics for expressive text kernels. In CIKM'07: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, pages 861-864, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
5. Susan Windisch Brown, Dmitriy Dligach, and Martha Palmer. 2011. Verbnet class assignment as a wsd task. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS '11, pages 85-94, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Razvan Bunescu and Raymond Mooney. 2005. A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In Proceedings of HLT and EMNLP, pages 724-731, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October.
7. Nicola Cancedda, Eric Gaussier, Cyril Goutte, and Jean Michel Renders. 2003. Word sequence kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1059-1082.
8. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of NAACL'00.
9. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2002. New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron. In Proceedings of ACL'02.
10. Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor, and Huma Lodhi. 2001. Latent semantic kernels. In Carla Brodley and Andrea Danyluk, editors, Proceedings of ICML-01, 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 66-73, Williams College, US. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US.
11. Danilo Croce, Cristina Giannone, Paolo Annesi, and Roberto Basili. 2010. Towards open-domain semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 237-246, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Danilo Croce, Alessandro Moschitti, and Roberto Basili. 2011. Structured Lexical Similarity via Convolution Kernels on Dependency Trees. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2011.
13. Chad Cumby and Dan Roth. 2003. Kernel Methods for Relational Learning. In Proceedings of ICML 2003.
14. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2004. Np bracketing by maximum entropy tagging and SVM reranking. In Proceedings of EMNLP'04.
15. Dmitriy Dligach and Martha Palmer. 2008. Novel semantic features for verb sense disambiguation. In ACL (Short Papers), pages 29-32. The Association for Computer Linguistics.
16. J. Firth. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930- 1955. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Philological Society, Oxford. reprinted in Palmer, F. (ed. 1968) Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, Longman, Harlow.
17. G. W. Furnas, S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, R. A. Harshman, L. A. Streeter, and K. E. Lochbaum. 1988. Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In Proc. of SIGIR '88, New York, USA.
18. Daniel Gildea and Daniel Jurasfky. 2002. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistic, 28(3):496-530.
19. Daniel Gildea and Martha Palmer. 2002. The necessity of parsing for predicate argument recognition. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-02), Philadelphia, PA.
20. Ana-Maria Giuglea and Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Semantic role labeling via framenet, verbnet and propbank. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 929-936, Sydney, Australia, July.
21. Alfio Gliozzo, Claudio Giuliano, and Carlo Strapparava. 2005. Domain kernels for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of ACL'05, pages 403-410.
22. G. Golub and W. Kahan. 1965. Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Series B, Numerical Analysis.
23. T. Joachims. 2000. Estimating the generalization performance of a SVM efficiently. In Proceedings of ICML'00.
24. Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2008. Dependency-based syntactic-semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2008, pages 183-187.
25. Taku Kudo and Yuji Matsumoto. 2003. Fast methods for kernel-based text analysis. In Proceedings of ACL'03.
26. Taku Kudo, Jun Suzuki, and Hideki Isozaki. 2005. Boosting-based parse reranking with subtree features. In Proceedings of ACL'05.
27. Tom Landauer and Sue Dumais. 1997. A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104.
28. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar word. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, Montreal, Canada.
29. Edward Loper, Szu ting Yi, and Martha Palmer. 2007. Combining lexical resources: Mapping between propbank and verbnet. In In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computational Linguistics.
30. Yashar Mehdad, Alessandro Moschitti, and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto. 2010. Syntactic/semantic structures for textual entailment recognition. In HLT-NAACL, pages 1020-1028.
31. Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. In Proceedings of ECML'06, pages 318-329.
32. Sebastian Padó, 2006. User's guide to sigf: Significance testing by approximate randomisation.
33. Patrick Pantel, Rahul Bhagat, Bonaventura Coppola, Timothy Chklovski, and Eduard Hovy. 2007. Isp: Learning inferential selectional preferences. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2007.
34. Daniele Pighin and Alessandro Moschitti. 2009a. Efficient linearization of tree kernel functions. In Proceedings of CoNLL'09.
35. Daniele Pighin and Alessandro Moschitti. 2009b. Reverse engineering of tree kernel feature spaces. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 111-120, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36. Daniele Pighin and Alessandro Moschitti. 2010. On reverse feature engineering of syntactic tree kernels. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL '10, pages 223-233, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
37. Sameer Pradhan, Kadri Hacioglu, Valeri Krugler, Wayne Ward, James H. Martin, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2005. Support vector learning for semantic argument classification. Machine Learning Journal.
38. Ryan Rifkin and Aldebaro Klautau. 2004. In defense of one-vs-all classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:101-141.
39. Magnus Sahlgren. 2006. The Word-Space Model. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University.
40. Karin Kipper Schuler. 2005. VerbNet: A broadcoverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylyania.
41. Hinrich Schutze. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Journal of Computational Linguistics, 24:97- 123.
42. John Shawe-Taylor and Nello Cristianini. 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
43. Libin Shen, Anoop Sarkar, and Aravind k. Joshi. 2003. Using LTAG Based Features in Parse Reranking. In Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 89-96, Sapporo, Japan.
44. Ivan Titov and James Henderson. 2006. Porting statistical parsers with data-defined kernels. In Proceedings of CoNLL-X.
45. Kristina Toutanova, Penka Markova, and Christopher Manning. 2004. The Leaf Path Projection View of Parse Trees: Exploring String Kernels for HPSG Parse Selection. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004.
46. Peter D. Turney and Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37:141- 188.
47. Ludwig Wittgenstein. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwells, Oxford.
48. Alexander S. Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In COLING, pages 947-953.
49. Beñat Zapirain, Eneko Agirre, Lluís Màrquez, and Mihai Surdeanu. 2010. Improving semantic role classification with selectional preferences. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, HLT '10, pages 373-376, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
50. Dmitry Zelenko, Chinatsu Aone, and Anthony Richardella. 2002. Kernel methods for relation extraction. In Proceedings of EMNLP-ACL, pages 181-201.
51. Min Zhang, Jie Zhang, and Jian Su. 2006. Exploring Syntactic Features for Relation Extraction using a Convolution tree kernel. In Proceedings of NAACL.