Topic models for dynamic translation model adaptation

50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 115-119

  Eidelman, Vladimir ^a   Boyd Graber, Jordan ^a   Resnik, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC TRANSLATION; HUMAN ANNOTATIONS; LEXICAL PROBABILITY; MACHINE TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; TOPIC DISTRIBUTIONS; TOPIC MODEL; TRANSLATION MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 84878174906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Amittai Axelrod, Xiaodong He, and Jianfeng Gao. 2011. Domain adaptation via pseudo in-domain data selection. In Proceedings of Emperical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
2. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, Michael I. Jordan, and John Lafferty. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:2003.
3. Jordan Boyd-Graber and Philip Resnik. 2010. Holistic sentiment analysis across languages: Multilingual supervised latent Dirichlet allocation. In Proceedings of Emperical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
4. Stanley F. Chen and Joshua Goodman. 1996. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 310-318.
5. David Chiang, Steve De Neefe, and Michael Pust. 2011. Two easy improvements to lexical weighting. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference.
6. Koby Crammer, Ofer Dekel, Joseph Keshet, Shai Shalev- Shwartz, and Yoram Singer. 2006. Online passiveaggressive algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:551-585.
7. Chris Dyer, Adam Lopez, Juri Ganitkevitch, Jonathan Weese, Ferhan Ture, Phil Blunsom, Hendra Setiawan, Vladimir Eidelman, and Philip Resnik. 2010. cdec: A decoder, alignment, and learning framework for finitestate and context-free translation models. In Proceedings of ACL System Demonstrations.
8. Vladimir Eidelman. 2012. Optimization strategies for online large-margin learning in machine translation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.
9. George Foster, Cyril Goutte, and Roland Kuhn. 2010. Discriminative instance weighting for domain adaptation in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of Emperical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
10. Philipp Koehn, Franz Josef Och, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1, NAACL '03, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
11. Spyros Matsoukas, Antti-Veikko I. Rosti, and Bing Zhang. 2009. Discriminative corpus weight estimation for machine translation. In Proceedings of Emperical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
12. A. K. McCallum. 2002. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit.
13. Franz Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. In Computational Linguistics, volume 29(21), pages 19- 51.
14. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311- 318.
15. Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, and Richard Schwartz. 2008. Language and translation model adaptation using comparable corpora. In Proceedings of Emperical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
16. Yik-Cheung Tam, Ian Lane, and Tanja Schultz. 2007. Bilingual LSA-based adaptation for statistical machine translation. Machine Translation, 21(4):187-207.
17. Yee Whye Teh, Michael I. Jordan, Matthew J. Beal, and David M. Blei. 2006. Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(476):1566-1581.
18. Bing Zhao and Eric P. Xing. 2006. BiTAM: Bilingual topic admixture models for word alignment. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics.