A large subcategorization lexicon for natural language processing applications

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1015-1020

  Korhonen, Anna ^a   Krymolowski, Yuval ^b   Briscoe, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUISITION SYSTEMS; FREQUENCY INFORMATION; SUBCATEGORIZATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84878167519     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. A. Arun and F. Keller. 2005. Lexicalization in crosslin-guistic probabilistic parsing: The case of French. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 306-313, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2. B. K. Boguraev and E. J. Briscoe. 1987. Large lexicons for natural language processing utilising the grammar coding system of the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Computational Linguistics, 13(4):219-240.
3. M. Brent. 1993. From grammar to lexicon: unsupervised learning of lexical syntax. Computational Linguistics, 19(3):243-262.
4. E. J. Briscoe and J. Carroll. 1997. Automatic extraction of subcategorization from corpora. In Proceedings of ACL ANLP97, pages 356-363.
5. E. J. Briscoe and J. Carroll. 2002. Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1499-1504.
6. E. J. Briscoe. 2000. Dictionary and System Subcategorisation Code Mappings. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.
7. G. Carroll and M. Rooth. 1998. Valence induction with a head-lexicalized PCFG. In 3rd Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Granada, Spain.
8. J. Carroll, E. J. Briscoe, and A. Sanfilippo. 1998. Parser evaluation: A survey and a new proposal. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 447-454.
9. S. F. Chen and J. Goodman. 1996. An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 310-318.
10. E. Ferrer. 2004. Towards a semantic classification of spanish verbs based on subcategorisation information. In ACL Student Research Workshop, Barcelona, Spain.
11. D. Graff. 1995. North American News Text Corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium. LDC95T21.
12. R. Grishman, C. Macleod, and A. Meyers. 1994. Comlex syntax: building a computational lexicon. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING-94, pages 268-272.
13. J. Hajič, M. Čmejrek, B. Dorr, Y. Ding, J. Eisner, D. Gildea, T. Koo, K. Parton, G. Penn, D. Radev, and O. Rambow. 2002. Natural language generation in the context of machine translation. Technical report, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Summer Workshop Final Report.
14. S. M. Katz. 1987. Estimation of probabilities from sparse data for the language model component of a speech recogniser. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 35(3):400-401.
15. D. Kawahara, N. Kaji, and S. Kurohashi. 2000. Japanese Case Structure Analysis by Unsupervised Construction of a Case Frame Dictionary. In Proc. of the 18th COLING.
16. A. Korhonen and E. J. Briscoe. 2004. Extended Lexical-Semantic Classification of English Verbs. In Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, Boston, MA.
17. A. Korhonen and Y. Krymolowski. 2002. On the robustness of entropy-based similarity measures in evaluation of subcategorization acquisition systems. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Natural Language Learning, pages 91-97.
18. A. Korhonen and J. Preiss. 2003. Improving Subcategorization Acquisition using Word Sense Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 48-55, Sapporo, Japan.
19. A. Korhonen, Y. Krymolowski, and Z. Marx. 2003. Clustering Polysemic Subcategorization Frame Distributions Semantically. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of ACL, pages 64-71, Sapporo, Japan.
20. A. Korhonen. 2002a. Semantically motivated subcategorization acquisition. In ACL Workshop on Unsupervised Lexical Acquisition, pages 51-58, Philadelphia.
21. A. Korhonen. 2002b. Subcategorization Acquisition. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
22. M. Lapata, F. Keller, and S. Schulteim Walde. 2001. Verb frame frequency as a predictor of verb bias. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4):419-435.
23. P. Laplace. 1995. Philosophical Essays on Probabilities. Springer-Verlag.
24. G. Leech. 1992. 100 million words of English: the British National Corpus. Language Research, 28(1):1-13.
25. B. Levin. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago University Press.
26. D. McCarthy and J. Carroll. 2003. Disambiguating nouns, verbs and adjectives using automatically acquired selectional preferences. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):639-654.
27. D. McCarthy. 2000. Using semantic preferences to identify verbal participation in role switching alternations. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pages 229-277, Seattle, WA.
28. G. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Felbaum, D. Gross, and K. Miller. 1990. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. Journal of Lexicography, 3(4):235-244.
29. T.G. Rose, M. Stevenson, and M. Whitehead. 2002. The Reuters Corpus Volume 1 - from yesterday's news to tomorrow's language resources. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain.
30. S. Schulte im Walde and C. Brew. 2002. Inducing german semantic verb classes from purely syntactic subcategorisation information. In Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of ACL, Philadephia, USA.
31. M. Surdeanu, S. Harabagiu, J. Williams, and P. Aarseth. 2003. Using predicate-argument structures for information extraction. In Proc. of the 41st Annual Meeting of ACL, Sapporo.