Individual A-scan signal normalization between two spectral domain optical coherence tomography devices

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 3463-3471

  Chen, Chieh Li ^a,b   Ishikawa, Hiroshi ^a,b   Wollstein, Gadi ^a   Ling, Yun ^c   Bilonick, Richard A ^a,c   Kagemann, Larry ^a,b   Sigal, Ian A ^a,b,d   Schuman, Joel S ^a,b,d  

^a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparability; Image analysis; Optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NOISE REDUCTION; PHOTORECEPTOR INNER SEGMENT; PHOTORECEPTOR OUTER SEGMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

COMPARABILITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84878162596     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11484     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Drexler W, Fujimoto JG. State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27:45-88.
2. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: advantages and advances. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:556-79.
3. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2425-36.
4. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 325-332.
5. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Arya AV, et al. Optical coherence tomography: a new tool for glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6:89-95.
6. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:586-96.
7. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1996;103: 1889-1898.
8. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 1264-1270.
9. Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1271-1277.
10. Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:775-781.
11. Leite MT, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, et al. Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:85-92.
12. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Tomioka M, et al. Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:832-837.
13. Tan BB, Natividad M, Chua KC, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement between 2 spectral domain OCT instruments. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:266-273.
14. Buchser NM, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:3742-3747.
15. DICOM Standards Committee. Proposal for collaboration between DICOM and the International Working Group for intracoronary OCT standardization and validation (IWG-OCT). Available at: http://medical.nema.org/dicom/minutes/ committee/2009/2009-04-21/other_documents/wg-01_ proposed%20collaboration_iwg-oct.doc Accessed September 4, 2012.
16. Sihan K, Botha C, Post F, et al. Fully automatic threedimensional quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: method and validation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2009;74:1058-1065.
17. Chiang MF, Boland MV, Brewer A, et al. Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1681-1687.
18. Huang Y, Gangaputra S, Lee KE, et al. Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;53:2133-2141.
19. Fabritius T, Makita S, Hong Y, et al. Automated retinal shadow compensation of optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:010503.
20. Girard MJA, Strouthidis NG, Ethier CR, et al. Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7738-7748.
21. Tappeiner C, Barthelmes D, Abegg MH, et al. Impact of optic media opacities and image compression on quantitative analysis of optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1609-1614.
22. van der Schoot J, Vermeer KA, de Boer JF, et al. The effect of glaucoma on the optical attenuation coefficient of the retinal nerve fiber layer in spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2424-2430.
23. Vermeer KA, van der Schoot J, Lemij HG, et al. RPE-normalized RNFL attenuation coefficient maps derived from volumetric OCT imaging for glaucoma assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6102-6108.