Impact of a cybertutor in dermatological teaching

International Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 722-727

  Soirefmann, Mariana ^a,b   Comparin, Cristiane ^a,b   Boza, Juliana ^a,b   Wen, Chao Lung ^a,b   Cestari, Tania Ferreira ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CYBERTUTOR; DERMATOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MULTIMEDIA; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARD; TEACHER; TEACHING; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; VIDEORECORDING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; DERMATOLOGY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; MULTIMEDIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF EFFICACY; SKIN DISEASES, PARASITIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878155182     PISSN: 00119059     EISSN: 13654632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12030     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Saffron M. The eighteenth century: education and the teachers. In: Lyons AS, Petrucelli J, eds. Medicine: An Illustrated History. New York: Abradale Press, 1987: 474-482.
2. Seabra D, Srougi M, Baptista R, et al. Computer aided learning versus standard lecture for undergraduate education in urology. J Urol 2004; 171: 1220-1222.
3. Waugh RA, Mayer JW, Ewy GA, et al. Multimedia computed-assisted instruction in cardiology. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 197.
4. Lana-Peixoto MA. The education of neurologists for the XXI century. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1993; 51: 409.
5. Jonas HS, Etzel SI, Barzansky B. Educational programs in US medical schools. JAMA 1993; 270: 1061.
6. Schwartz RW, Donnelly MB, Young B, et al. Undergraduate surgical education for the twenty-first century. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 639.
7. Woods JW, Jones RR, Schoutz TW, et al. Teaching pathology in the 21st century. An experimental automated curriculum delivery system for basic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112: 852-856.
8. Martin VL, Bennett DS. Creation of a web-based lecture series for psychiatry clerkship students: initial findings. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 209-214.
9. Romero G, Garrido JA, García-Arpa M. Telemedicine and teledermatology (I): concepts and applications. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008; 99: 506-522.
10. Ratner D, Thomas CO, Bickers D. The uses of digital photography in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 749-756.
11. Lindstrom RL. Guia business week para Apresentações em multimídia. São Paulo: Makron Books, 1995.
12. Sprawls P. Re-engineering the process of medical imaging physics and technology education and training. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27: 625-632.
13. Jenkins S, Goel R, Morrell DS. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomized control trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 255-259.
14. Carvalho PM, Sabbatini RME. Aplicações da multimídia na Medicina. Revista Informédica 1994; 1: 15.
15. Mars M, McLean M. Students' perceptions of a multimedia computer-aided instruction resource in histology. S Afr Med J 1996; 86: 1098.
16. Shaikh N, Lehmann CU, Kaleida PH, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of teledermatology for pediatric medical education. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 204-207.
17. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Yeh KA, et al. Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 508-510.
18. Lamberti A, Sodicoff M. Computer-based neuroanatomy laboratory for medical students. Anat Rec 1997; 249: 422-428.
19. Hong CH, McLean D, Shapiro J, et al. Using the internet to assess and teach medical students dermatology. J Cutan Med Surg 2002; 6: 315-319.
20. Potomkova J, Mihal V, Cihalik C. Web-based instruction and its impact on the learning activity of medical students: a review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2006; 150: 357-361.