Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival?

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 99, Issue 4 SUPPL, 2013, Pages

  Chatellard, R ^a   Sauleau, V ^b   Colmar, M ^c   Robert, H ^d   Raynaud, G ^e   Brilhault, J ^a,f  

^a SERVICE DE DERMATOLOGIE   (France)

^b SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^c Clinique Jeanne D'Arc   (France)

^d Centre hospitalier Nord   (France)

^e Clinique Jules Verne   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

Function; Knee; Survival; Unicompartmental arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS SURVIVAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TIBIA; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 84878149491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973, (94):242-248.
2. Marmor L. The modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, (120):86-94.
3. Marmor L. Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979, 61(3):347-353.
4. Cartier P., Cheaib S., Vanvooren P. Unicompartmentalprosthetic replacement of the knee. 159 cases a maximum follow-up of 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop 1987, 73(Suppl. 2):130-133.
5. Laurencin C.T., Zelicof S.B., Scott R.D., Ewald F.C. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, (273):151-156.
6. Rougraff B.T., Heck D.A., Gibson A.E. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, (273):157-164.
7. Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E., Shah N.A. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80(5):862-865.
8. Argenson J.N., Yamina A., Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84(12):2235-2239.
9. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J. The oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80(6):983-989.
10. Felts E., Parratte S., Pauly V., Aubaniac J.M., Argenson J.N. Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010, 96(8):861-867.
11. Noticewala M.S., Geller J.A., Lee J.H., Macaulay W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(8 Suppl.):99-105.
12. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., Sheinkop M.B., Della Valle C.J., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(5):999-1006.
13. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80(6):983-989.
14. Mallory T.H., Danyi J. Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. A five- to nine-year follow-up study of 42 procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983, (175):135-138.
15. Lustig S., Paillot J.L., Servien E., Henry J., Ait Si Selm T., Neyret P. Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou avec plateau tibial tout polyéthylène cimenté : à propos de 144 cas à cinq ans de recul moyen. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95(1):12-21.
16. Insall J., Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, (120):83-85.
17. Laskin R.S. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60(2):182-185.
18. Epinette J.A., Brunschweiler B., Mertl P., Mole D., Cazenave A., Hernigou P., et al. Échecs des prothèses unicompartimentales du genou : l'usure n'est pas la principale raison d'échec. Une étude multicentrique de 418 échecs. Rev de Chir Orthop Trauma 2012, 98(6 Suppl.):S239-S245.
19. Aleto T.J., Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Meneghini R.M. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(2):159-163.
20. Collier M.B., Eickmann T.H., Sukezaki F., McAuley J.P., Engh G.A. Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl. 2):108-115.
21. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, (248):13-14.
22. Roos E.M., Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:17.
23. Ramadier J.O., Buard J.E., Lortat-Jacob A., Benoit J. Radiological assessment of knee deformity in the frontal plane. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1982, 68(1):75-78.
24. Dugdale T.W., Noyes F.R., Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, (274):248-264.
25. Brazier J., Migaud H., Gougeon F., Cotten A., Fontaine C., Duquennoy A. Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthyknees. Rev Chir Orthop 1996, 82(3):195-200.
26. o 34 1989, Elsevier Masson, Paris, p. 113-23.
27. Lesaka K., Tsumura H., Sonoda H., Sawatari T., Takasita M., Torisu T. The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2002, 35(7):969-974.
28. Ahlbäck S., Rydberg J. X-ray classification and examination technics in gonarthrosis. Lakartidningen 1980, 77(22):2091-2093. [2096].
29. Hernigou P., Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (423):161-165.
30. Levigne C. Intérêt de l'axe épiphysaire dans l'arthrose. Analyse du groupe témoin 1991.
31. o 65. 1998, Elsevier Masson, Paris.
32. Sawatari T., Tsumura H., Lesaka K., Furushiro Y., et Torisu T. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - The influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res 2005, 23(3):549-554.
33. Borrione F., Bertin D., Bonnevialle P. Biomécanique du genou prothésé. Manuel d'arthroplastie du genou 2010, Sauramps edition, Montpellier, p. 23-51.
34. Migaud H., De Ladoucette A., Dohin B., Cloutier J.M., Gougeon F., Duquennoy A. Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1996, 82(1):7-13.
35. Hernigou P., Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86(3):506-511.
36. Lewold S., Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998, 69(5):469-474.
37. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., Vollset S.E., Engesaeter L.B., Havelin L.I. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(3):519-525.
38. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., Lidgren L. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:45-49.