메뉴 건너뛰기
Traffic
Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 611-612
Misuse of Journal Impact Factors in Scientific Assessment
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;
EID: 84878142669     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tra.12075     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (14)
References (15)
  • 1
    • 0015493305 scopus 로고
    • Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation
    • Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972;178:471-479.
    • (1972) Science , vol.178 , pp. 471-479
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 2
    • 17444403508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused?
    • Scully C, Lodge H. Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? Br Dent J 2005;198:391-393.
    • (2005) Br Dent J , vol.198 , pp. 391-393
    • Scully, C.1    Lodge, H.2
  • 3
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 4
    • 84864290158 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Commentson a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor
    • Pendlebury DA, Adams J. Commentson a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics 2012;92:395-401.
    • (2012) Scientometrics , vol.92 , pp. 395-401
    • Pendlebury, D.A.1    Adams, J.2
  • 5
    • 33745613796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact factor game
    • The PLoS Medicine Editors. ;:.
    • The PLoS Medicine Editors. The impact factor game. PLoS Med 2006;3:e291.
    • (2006) PLoS Med , vol.3
  • 6
    • 70149112595 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The journal impact factor denominator: defining citable (counted) items
    • McVeigh ME, Mann SJ. The journal impact factor denominator: defining citable (counted) items. JAMA 2009;302:1107-1109.
    • (2009) JAMA , vol.302 , pp. 1107-1109
    • McVeigh, M.E.1    Mann, S.J.2
  • 7
    • 46949107682 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On indexing in the web of science and predicting journal impact factor
    • Wu XF, Fu Q, Rousseau R. On indexing in the web of science and predicting journal impact factor. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2008;9:582-590.
    • (2008) J Zhejiang Univ Sci B , vol.9 , pp. 582-590
    • Wu, X.F.1    Fu, Q.2    Rousseau, R.3
  • 8
    • 84863842264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification
    • Vanclay JK. Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification. Scientometric 2012;92:211-238.
    • (2012) Scientometric , vol.92 , pp. 211-238
    • Vanclay, J.K.1
  • 9
    • 57849163179 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias in the journal impact factor
    • Vanclay JK. Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics 2009;78:3-12.
    • (2009) Scientometrics , vol.78 , pp. 3-12
    • Vanclay, J.K.1
  • 10
    • 84864280678 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators
    • van Raan AFJ. Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics 2012;92:457-469.
    • (2012) Scientometrics , vol.92 , pp. 457-469
    • van Raan, A.F.J.1
  • 11
    • 84864290103 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The journal impact factor: angel, devil or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay's article 2011
    • Zitt M. The journal impact factor: angel, devil or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay's article 2011. Scientometrics 2012;92:485-503.
    • (2012) Scientometrics , vol.92 , pp. 485-503
    • Zitt, M.1
  • 12
    • 21744446266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial. Not so deep impact
    • Editorial. Not so deep impact. Nature 2005;435:1003-1004.
    • (2005) Nature , vol.435 , pp. 1003-1004
  • 14
    • 0040039836 scopus 로고
    • Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields
    • Vinkler P. Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields. Scientometrics 1991;20:145-161.
    • (1991) Scientometrics , vol.20 , pp. 145-161
    • Vinkler, P.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.