Validation of the amsterdam IADL questionnaire©, a new tool to measure instrumental activities of daily living in dementia

Neuroepidemiology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 35-41

  Sikkes, Sietske A M ^a,b   Knol, Dirk L ^b   Pijnenburg, Yolande A L ^a,b   De Lange De Klerk, Elly S M ^b   Uitdehaag, Bernard M J ^b   Scheltens, Philip ^a,b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire ; Cognition; Dementia; Depression; Informants; Item response theory; Measurement; Mild cognitive impairment; Questionnaires; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMSTERDAM INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING QUESTIONNAIRE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VALIDITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEMENTIA; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84878070070     PISSN: 02515350     EISSN: 14230208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000346277     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnos-tic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disor-ders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
2. Desai AK, Grossberg GT, Sheth DN: Activi-ties of daily living in patients with dementia: clinical relevance, methods of assessment and effects of treatment. CNS Drugs 2004; 18: 853-875. (Pubitemid 39612016)
3. Sikkes SAM, de Lange-de Klerk ESMD, Pij-nenburg YAL, Scheltens P, Uitdehaag BMJ: A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: room for improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 7-12.
4. Avlund K: Methodological challenges in mea-surements of functional ability in gerontolog-ical research. A review. Aging (Milano) 1997; 9: 164-174.
5. Bavazzano A, Magnolfi SU, Calvani D, Va-lente C, Boni F, Baldini A, Quesada JJ: Func-tional evaluation of Alzheimer patients dur-ing clinical trials: a review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1998; 26(suppl 1):27-32.
6. Sikkes SAM, de Lange-de Klerk E, Pijnenburg YAL, Gilissen F, Romkes R, Knol DL, Uitde-haag BMJ, Scheltens P: A new informant-based questionnaire for instrumental activi-ties of daily living in dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2012; 8: 536-543.
7. Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measure-ment Scales: A Practical Guide to Their De-velopment and Use, ed 4. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.
8. Roelofsma P, Bottema C, Smeets J: Examine: A Web Survey Tool for Research Design and Analysis. Amsterdam, SLA Press, 2005.
9. Embretson SE, Reise SP: Item Response The-ory for Psychologists. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 2000.
10. Wirth RJ, Edwards MC: Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions. Psychol Methods 2007; 12: 58-79.
11. Reise SP, Waller NG: Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2009; 5: 27-48.
12. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW: The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on mea-surement properties of health status measure-ment instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 539-549.
13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR Mini-mental state-a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.
14. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ: The mini-men-tal-state-examination-a comprehensive re-view. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 922-935.
15. Roth M, Tym E, Mountjoy CQ, Huppert FA, Hendrie H, Verma S, Goddard R CAMDEX. A standardized instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 149: 698-709. (Pubitemid 17205276)
16. Huppert FA, Jorm AF, Brayne C, Girling DM, Barkley C, Beardsall L, Paykel ES: Psychomet-ric properties of the CAMCOG and its effi-cacy in the diagnosis of dementia. Neuropsy-chol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 1996; 3: 201-214. (Pubitemid 26411198)
17. Gelinas I, Gauthier L, McIntyre M, Gauthier S: Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer's disease: the disabil-ity assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 471-481.
18. Burns A, Lawlor B, Craig S: Assessment Scales in Old Age Psychiatry, ed 2. London, Dunitz, 2004.
19. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL: A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982; 140: 566-572. (Pubitemid 12124384)
20. Morris JC: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 1993; 43: 2412-2414. (Pubitemid 23346995)
21. Rockwood K, Strang D, MacKnight C, Down-er R, Morris JC: Interrater reliability of the clinical dementia rating in a multicenter trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 558-559. (Pubitemid 30263110)
22. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO: Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psy-chiatr Res 1983; 17: 37-49. (Pubitemid 13123113)
23. Montorio I, Izal M: The Geriatric Depression Scale: a review of its development and utility. Int Psychogeriatr 1996; 8: 103-112. (Pubitemid 26248776)
24. van de Rest O, van der Zwaluw N, Beekman ATF, de Groot LCPG, Geleijnse JM: The reli-ability of three depression rating scales in a general population of Dutch older persons. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25: 998-1005.
25. Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385-401.
26. Beekman ATF, Deeg DJH, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, De Vries MZ, Van Tilburg W: Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemio-logic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): re-sults from a community-based sample of old-er subjects in The Netherlands. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 231-235. (Pubitemid 27042735)
27. Beekman AT, van Limbeek J, Deeg DJ, Wout-ers L, van Tilburg W: A screening tool for de-pression in the elderly in the general popula-tion: the usefulness of Center for Epidemio-logical Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (in Dutch). Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1994; 25: 95-103.
28. Zarit S, Reever K, Bach-Peterson J: Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980; 20: 649-655. (Pubitemid 11170845)
29. Zarit SH, Zarit JM: The Memory and Behav-ior Problems Checklist and the Burden Inter-view. University Park, Penn State Gerontol-ogy Center, 1990.
30. Hebert R, Bravo G, Preville M: Reliability, va-lidity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with de-mentia. Can J Aging 2000; 19: 494-507. (Pubitemid 32155573)
31. Samejima F: Estimation of Latent Ability Us-ing A Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika Monogr Suppl 1969; 34: 100.
32. Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User's Guide, ed 6. Los Angeles, Muthén & Muthén, 2010.
33. Stone C: IRTFIT-RESAMPLE: a computer program for assessing goodness of fit of items response theory models based on posterior expectations. Appl Psychol Meas 2004; 28: 143-144. (Pubitemid 38318023)
34. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S: Generalized La-tent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitu-dinal and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004.
35. Samejima F: Estimation of reliability coeffi-cients using the test information function and its modifications. Appl Psychol Meas 1994; 18: 229-244.
36. Chang YL, Bondi MW, McEvoy LK, Fenne-ma-Notestine C, Salmon DP, Galasko D, Ha-gler DJ, Dale AM: Global clinical dementia rating of 0.5 in MCI masks variability related to level of functioning. Neurology 2011; 76: 652-659.
37. Luck T, Luppa M, Angermeyer MC, Villring-er A, Konig HH, Riedel-Heller SG: Impact of impairment in instrumental activities of daily living and mild cognitive impairment on time to incident dementia: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+). Z Gerontol Geriatr 2010; 43: 63.
38. Peres K, Chrysostome V, Fabrigoule C, Or-gogozo JM, Dartigues JF, Barberger-Gateau P: Restriction in complex activities of daily liv-ing in MCI: impact on outcome. Neurology 2006; 67: 461-466. (Pubitemid 44214971)
39. Jorm AF: The Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review. Int Psychogeriatr 2004; 16: 275-293. (Pubitemid 39441493)
40. Sikkes SAM, Visser PJ, Knol DL, de Lange-de Klerk E, Tsolaki M, Frisoni GB, Nobili F, Spi-ru L, Rigaud AS, Frolich L, Olde Rikkert M, Soininen H, Touchon J, Wilcock G, Boada M, Hampel H, Bullock R, Vellas B, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens P, Verhey F, Uitdehaag BMJ: Do instrumental activities of daily living pre-dict dementia at 1-and 2-year follow-up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic Criteria for Prede-mentia Alzheimer's disease study. J Am Geri-atr Soc 2011; 59: 2273-2281.
41. Mangone CA, Sanguinetti RM, Baumann PD, Gonzalez RC, Pereyra S, Bozzola FG, Gorelick PB, Sica RE: Influence of feelings of burden on the caregiver's perception of the patient's functional status. Dementia 1993; 4: 287-293. (Pubitemid 23281690)