Does slacktivism hurt activism?: The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 811-820

  Lee, Yu Hao ^a   Hsieh, Gary ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consistency; Moral balancing; Online petitions; Slacktivism

Indexed keywords

CONSISTENCY; ON-LINE EXPERIMENTS; ONLINE PETITIONS; SLACKTIVISM;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84878002162     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2470770     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Dolin, D.J., Booth-Butterfield, S. Foot-in-the-door and cancer prevention. Health Communication 7, 1 (1995), 55-66.
2. Effron, D. and Monin, B. Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (2010), 1618-1634.
3. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.
4. Gladwell, M. Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker, 4 October 2010.
5. Guéguen, N. Foot-in-the-door technique and computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 1 (2002), 11-15
6. Khan, U. and Dhar, R. Where there is a way, there is a will? The effect of future choices on self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (2007), 277-288.
7. Land, M.B. Networked activism. Harvard Human Rights Journal. NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper 22, 09/10 (2009), #13.
8. Mazar, N. and Zhong, C. B. Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science 21 (2010), 494-498.
9. Merritt, A.M. Effron, D.A. and Monin, B. Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (2010), 344-357.
10. Miller, D.T. and Effron, D.A. Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In Zanna, M.P. and Olson, J.M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 43, San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier (2010), 117-158.
11. Monin, B. and Miller, D.T. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001), 33-43.
12. Morozov, E. The brave new world of slacktivism. Net Effect - Foreign Policy. Slate Group, 19 May 2009. Web. 5 Apr. 2010.
13. Nisan, M. (1991). The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In Kurtines, W.M. and Gewirtz, J.L. (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1991), 213-249.
14. Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide and Georgetown University's Center for Social Impact Communication. Dynamics of Cause Engagement. At http://csic.georgetown.edu/research/215767.html
15. Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press (1965).
16. Pepitone, J. Text donations raise $7m for Red Cross Haiti effort. CNNMoney, January 16, 2010.
17. Rotman, D. Vieweg, S. Yardi, S. Chi, E. Preece, J. Shneiderman, B. Pirolli, P. and Glaisyer, T. From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011).
18. Sachdeva, S. Iliev, R. and Medin, D.L. Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science 20, 4(2009), 523-528.
19. Shulman, S.W. The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in U.S. federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet 1, 1 (2009), article 2
20. Schwarzwald,J. Bizman, A. and Raz, M. The foot-in-the-door paradigm: Effects of second request size on donation probability and donor generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9, 3 (1983), 443-450.
21. Vieweg, S. Hughes, A. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What Twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010).