A new method for assessing the exploratory field of view (EFOV)

HEALTHINF 2013 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 5-11

  Tafaj, Enkelejda ^a   Hempel, Sebastian ^a   Heister, Martin ^b   Aehling, Kathrin ^b   Dietzsch, Janko ^b   Schaeffel, Frank ^b   Rosenstiel, Wolfgang ^a   Schiefer, Ulrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Exploratory field of view; Eye movements; Ophthalmology; Visual exploration; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; COMPENSATORY STRATEGY; FIELD OF VIEWS; VISUAL EXPLORATION; VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL FUNCTIONS; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

DEFECTS; OPHTHALMOLOGY;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 84877983138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer.
2. Hardiess, G., Papageorgiou, E., Schiefer, U., and Mallot, H. A. (2010). Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands. Vision Res, 50(12):1158-1172.
3. Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. (2000). Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Henson, D. and Emuh, T. (2010). Monitoring vigilance during perimetry by using pupillography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 51(7):3540-3543.
5. Kotz, S. and Nadarajah, S. (2000). Extreme Value Distributions: Theory and Applications. Imperial College Press, 1st edition.
6. Li, D., Winfield, D., and Parkhurst, D. J. (2005). Starburst: A hybrid algorithm for video-based eye tracking combining feature-based and model-based approaches. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), pages 1-8.
7. Liversedge, S., and Gilchrist., I. D., and Everling, S. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements. Oxford University Press.
8. Martin, T., Riley, M., Kelly, K. N., Hayhoe, M., and Huxlin, K. R. (2007). Visually guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task. Vision Res, 47:3434-3446.
9. MATLAB (2012). version 7.14.0.739 (R2012a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.
10. Pambakian, A. L., and Wooding., D. S., Patel, N., Morland, A. B., Kennard, C., and Mannan, S. K. (2000). Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 69:751-759.
11. Riley, M., and Kelly., K. N., Martin, T., Hayhoe, M., and Huxlin, K. R. (2007). Homonymous hemianopia alters distribution of visual fixations in 3-dimensional visual environments. J Vision, 7:289.
12. Schiefer, U., Wilhelm, H., and Hart, W. (2008). Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology: A Practical Guide. Springer Verlag.
13. Tafaj, E., Kasneci, G., Rosenstiel, W., and Bogdan, M. (2012). Bayesian online clustering of eye movement data. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, ETRA'12, pages 285-288, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
14. th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pages 1-6.
15. Taylor, J. F. (1982). Vision and driving. Practitioner, 226:885-889.