Representing verbs with force vectors

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 38, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 237-248

  Wolff, Phillip ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877939341     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/tl-2012-0015     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Copley, Bridget (2005). Ordering and reasoning. In Jon Gajewski, Valentine Hacquard, Bernard Nickel, and Seth Yalcin (Eds.), New Work on Modality. New work on modality (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 52). Department of Linguistics & Philosophy, MIT.
2. Copley, Bridget, & Harley, Heidi (to appear). An ontology for a force-dynamic treatment of events. In Causation in grammatical structures, Bridget Copley and Fabienne Martin (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Croft, William (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Croft, William (to appear). Verbs: Aspect and argument structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Here cited from online version of June 2010.)
5. Jackendoff, Ray (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Jackendoff, Ray (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7. Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Levin, Beth, & Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Levin, Beth, & Rappaport Hovav, Malka (to appear). Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity, In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke, and Rafael Marín (Eds.), Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates, Springer, Dordrecht.
10. Nelson, Deborah G. (1993). Processing integral dimensions: the whole view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1114-1120.
11. Pinker, Steve (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
13. Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Ivy Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 21-38.
14. Vendler, Zeno (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56, 97-121.
15. Warglien, Massimo, Gärdenfors, Peter, & Westera, Matthijs (in press). Event structure, conceptual spaces, and the semantics of verbs. Theoretical Linguistics.
16. Weisgerber, Matthias (in press). Where lexical semantics meets physics: Towards an algorithmic lexical framework for modeling path motion. In Mila Vulchanova and Emile van der Zee (Eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. White, Peter A. (2012). The experience of force: The role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 589-615.
18. Wolff, Phillip, Klettke, Bianca, Tatyana, Ventura, & Song, Grace (2005). Expressing causation in English and other languages. In Woo-Kyoung. Ahn, Robert L. Goldstone, Bradley C. Love, Arthur B. Markman, & Phillip Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 29-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Wolff, Phillip, & Song, Grace (2003). Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 276-332. (Pubitemid 37244279)
20. Wolff, Phillip & Malt, Barbara, C. (2010). The language-thought interface: An introduction. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words encode human experience (pp. 3-15). Oxford University Press.
21. Wolff, Phillip (2007). Representing causation. Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82-111.
22. Wolff, Phillip, Barbey, Aron K., & Hausknecht, Matthew (2010). For want of a nail: How absences cause events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 191-221.
23. Wolff, Phillip, & Zettergren, Matthew (2002). A vector model of causal meaning. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 944-949). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Zwarts, Joost (1997). Vectors as relative positions: A compositional semantics of modified PPs, Journal of Semantics, 14, 57-86.
25. Zwarts, Joost & Winter, Yoad (2000). Vector space semantics: a model theoretic analysis of locative prepositions, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9, 171-213.
26. Zwarts, Joost. (2010). Forceful prepositions. In Vyvyan Evans and Paul Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. Equinox Publishing, 193-214.