Evaluating the efficiency of physical visualizations

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2593-2602

  Jansen, Yvonne ^a   Dragicevic, Pierre ^a   Fekete, Jean Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

3D visualization; Evaluation; Physical visualization

Indexed keywords

3D VISUALIZATION; DIGITAL FABRICATION; EMPIRICAL MOTIVATION; EVALUATION; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; PHYSICAL OBJECTS; PHYSICAL VISUALIZATION; STEREOSCOPIC RENDERINGS;

DATA VISUALIZATION; EFFICIENCY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84877937446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2481359     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Accot, J., and Zhai, S. More than dotting the i's-foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In CHI'02, CHI '02 (2002), 73-80.
2. Adamoli, A., Jovic, M., and Hauswirth, M. Lagalyzer: A latency profile analysis and visualization tool. In Performance Analysis of Systems & Software (ISPASS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE (2010), 13-22.
3. Amar, R., Eagan, J., and Stasko, J. Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization. In InfoVis'05 (2005).
4. Bade, R., Ritter, F., and Preim, B. Usability comparison of mouse-based interaction techniques for predictable 3d rotation. In Smart Graphics, Springer (2005), 924-924.
5. Bara, F., Gentaz, E., Colé, P., and Sprenger-Charolles, L. The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children's understanding of the alphabetic principle. Cognitive development 19, 3 (2004), 433-449.
6. Chi, E. H. A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In INFOVIS'00 (2000).
7. Cockburn, A., and McKenzie, B. Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2d and 3d physical and virtual environments. In CHI'02 (2002).
8. Cumming, G. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. Multivariate Applications Series. Routledge, 2011.
9. Dwyer, T. Two-and-a-half-dimensional Visualisation of Relational Networks. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, 2004.
10. Elmqvist, N., Do, T.-N., Goodell, H., Henry, N., and Fekete, J.-D. Zame: Interactive large-scale graph visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (2008), 215-222.
11. Goldstein, S. C., Campbell, J. D., and Mowry, T. C. Programmable matter. IEEE Computer 38, 6 (June 2005), 99-101.
12. Grossman, T., and Balakrishnan, R. An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays. In AVI'06 (2006).
13. Henry, N. Exploring large social networks with matrix-based representations. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud and University of Sydney, 2008.
14. Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. C., and Kassell, N. F. Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. In CHI'94 (1994).
15. Hinckley, K., Tullio, J., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., and Kassell, N. Usability analysis of 3d rotation techniques. In UIST'97 (1997).
16. Ishii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L., and Labrune, J.-B. Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. interactions 19, 1 (Jan. 2012), 38-51.
17. Javed, W., McDonnel, B., and Elmqvist, N. Graphical perception of multiple time series. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 16, 6 (2010), 927-934.
18. Jonpasang. Hypermatrix. http://vimeo.com/46857169, 2012.
19. Julesz, B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. U. Chicago Press, 1971.
20. Kjellin, A., Pettersson, L. W., Seipel, S., and Lind, M. Evaluating 2d and 3d visualizations of spatiotemporal information. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 7, 3 (June 2008), 19:1-19:23.
21. Konchada, V., Jackson, B., Le, T., Borazjani, I., Sotiropoulos, F., and Keefe, D. F. Supporting internal visualization of biomedical datasets via 3d rapid prototypes and sketch-based gestures. In I3D '11 (2011).
22. Kruszynski, K. J., and Liere, R. V. Tangible props for scientific visualization: concept, requirements, application. Virtual Reality 13 (2009), 235-244.
23. Leithinger, D., Lakatos, D., DeVincenzi, A., Blackshaw, M., and Ishii, H. Direct and gestural interaction with relief: A 2.5 d shape display. In UIST'11 (2011).
24. McGookin, D., Robertson, E., and Brewster, S. Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2010), 1715-1724.
25. Milgram, P., and Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems E77-D, 12 (1994).
26. Munzner, T. Information visualization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, ch. Process and Pitfalls in Writing Information Visualization Research Papers, 134-153.
27. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J., and Yamaji, Y. Lumen: interactive visual and shape display for calm computing. In SIGGRAPH'04 Emerging technologies (2004).
28. Pousman, Z., Stasko, J., and Mateas, M. Casual information visualization: Depictions of data in everyday life. TVCG 13, 6 (2007).
29. Rasmussen, M. K., Pedersen, E. W., Petersen, M. G., and Hornbæk, K. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. In CHI'12 (2012).
30. Risden, K., Czerwinski, M. P., Munzner, T., and Cook, D. B. An initial examination of ease of use for 2d and 3d information visualizations of web content. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53, 5 (2000), 695-714.
31. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J. R. Average task times in usability tests: what to report? In CHI'10 (2010).
32. Shneiderman, B. Why not make interfaces better than 3d reality? IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23, 6 (Nov. 2003).
33. Smith, G., Stuerzlinger, W., Salzman, T., Watson, B., and Buchanan, J. 3d scene manipulation with 2d devices and constraints. In Graphics Interface (2001), 135-142.
34. Spielman, H. A. "Virtual Reality" Circa 1935. http://tinyurl.com/spielman2006, October 2006.
35. Talbot, J., Lin, S., and Hanrahan, P. An extension of wilkinson's algorithm for positioning tick labels on axes. INFOVIS'10 (2010).
36. Todd, J. The visual perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Handbook of perception and cognition, Volume 5: Perception of space and motion (1995), 201-226.
37. Tufte, E. R. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, USA, 1986.
38. Ullmer, B., Kim, E., Kilian, A., Gray, S., and Ishii, H. Strata/icc: physical models as computational interfaces. In CHI EA '01 (2001).
39. Underkoffler, J., and Ishii, H. Urp: a luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. In CHI'99 (1999).
40. Vande Moere, A. Beyond the tyranny of the pixel: Exploring the physicality of information visualization. In IV'08 (2008).
41. Vande Moere, A., and Patel, S. Analyzing the design approaches of physical data sculptures in a design education context. In Visual Information Communications International (VINCI'09) (2009).
42. Ware, C., and Arsenault, R. Frames of reference in virtual object rotation. In APGV '04 (2004).
43. Ware, C., and Balakrishnan, R. Reaching for objects in vr displays: lag and frame rate. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 4 (Dec. 1994), 331-356.
44. Ware, C., and Mitchell, P. Reevaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing graphs in three dimensions. In APGV '05 (2005).
45. Ware, C., and Rose, J. Rotating virtual objects with real handles. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 2 (June 1999), 162-180.
46. Wehrend, S., and Lewis, C. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In Visualization'90 (1990).
47. Wilson, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002), 625-636.
48. Wilson, M. How GM is saving cash using legos as a data viz tool. http://tinyurl.com/mwilson2012, April 2012.
49. Zhai, S., and Milgram, P. Quantifying coordination in multiple dof movement and its application to evaluating 6 dof input devices. In CHI'98 (1998).
50. Zhai, S., Milgram, P., and Buxton, W. The influence of muscle groups on performance of multiple degree-of-freedom input. In CHI'96 (1996).