A study on the effect of different modeling parameters on the dynamic response of a jacket-type offshore wind turbine in the Korean Southwest Sea

Renewable Energy

Volumn 58, Issue , 2013, Pages 50-59

  Shi, Wei ^a   Park, Hyunchul ^b   Han, Jonghoon ^c   Na, Sangkwon ^d   Kim, Changwan ^a  

^a Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^b Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^c Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co Ltd   (South Korea)

^d University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dynamic response; Jacket foundation; Modeling parameters; Offshore wind turbine

Indexed keywords

DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXTREME LOADS; INTERMEDIATE WATERS; JACKET STRUCTURES; MODELING PARAMETERS; MW WIND TURBINE; OFFSHORE WINDS;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ENERGY UTILIZATION; MODAL ANALYSIS; OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES; WIND POWER;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FOUNDATION; LOADING; OFFSHORE STRUCTURE; PARAMETERIZATION; POWER GENERATION; WATER DEPTH; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE;

KOREA;

EID: 84877935179     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ackerman T., Söder L. Wind energy technology and current status: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2000, 4(4):315-374.
2. Jan W., Marte R., Christian S., Edgar G.H. Life cycle assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine. Renew Energy 2009, 34(3):742-747.
3. Jonkman J.M. Dynamics of offshore floating wind turbines - model development and verification. Wind Energy 2009, 12(5):459-492.
4. Lozano-Minguez E., Kolios A.J., Brennan F.P. Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renew Energy 2011, 36:2831-2837.
5. Oh K.Y., Kim J.Y., Lee J.S., Ryu K.W. Wind resource assessment around Korean Peninsula for feasibility study on 100MW class offshore wind farm. Renew Energy 2012, 42:217-226.
6. Hong L., Möller B. Offshore wind energy potential in China: under technical, spatial and economic constraints. Energy 2011, 36(7):4482-4491.
7. South Korea offshore wind project plan. [accessed 08.08.12]. http://www.evwind.es/2011/11/13/south-korea-to-build-worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm/.
8. Thomsen JH, Forsberg T, Bittner R. Offshore wind foundations - the COWI experience. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE), California, USA; 2007. p. 533-40.
9. Seidel M. Feasibility of monopiles for large offshore windturbines. In: Proceedings of the 10th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK), Bremen, Germany; 2010.
10. Alpha Ventus offshore wind farm. [accessed 08.08.12]. http://www.alpha-ventus.de/index.php%3fid%3d80.
11. Beatrice wind farm demonstrator project. [accessed 06.06.12]. http://www.beatricewind.co.uk.
12. BARD offshore 1 project. [accessed 08.08.12]. http://www.bard-offshore.de/en/projects/offshore/bard-offshore-1.html.
13. Seidel M. Jacket substructures for the REpower5 M wind turbine. In: Proceedings of European offshore wind energy conference and exhibition, Berlin, Germany; 2007.
14. Klose M, Dalhoff P, Argyriadis K. Integrated load and strength analysis for offshore wind turbines with jacket structures. In: Proceedings of European offshore wind energy conference and exhibition, Berlin, Germany; 2007.
15. Gao Z, Saha NLJ, Moan T, Amdahl J. Dynamic analysis of offshore fixed windturbines under wind and wave loads using alternative computer codes. In: Proceedings of the third TORQUE conference; 2010.
16. Dong W.B., Moan T., Gao Z. Long-term fatigue analysis of multi-planar tubular joints for jacket-type offshore wind turbine in time domain. Eng Struct 2011, 33(6):2002-2014.
17. Fischer T, Popko W, Soerensen JD, Kühn M. Load analysis of the upwind jacket reference support structure. In: Proceedings of DEWEK, Bremen, Germany; 2010.
18. Moll H, Vorpahl F, Busmann H. Dynamics of support structures for offshore wind turbines in fully-coupled simulations-influence of water added mass on jacket mode shapes, natural frequencies and loads. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Warsaw, Poland; 2010.
19. Cordle A., Kaufer D., Vorpahl F., Fischer T., Sørensen J., Schmidt B., et al. Final report for WP4.3: enhancement of design methods and standards. UpWind deliverable D4.3.6 (WP4: offshore foundations and support structures) 2011, Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd.
20. Kaufer D, Fischer T, Vorpahl F, Popko W, Kühn M. Different approaches to modeling jacket support structures and their impact on overall wind turbine dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 10th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK), Bremen, Germany; 2010.
21. Shi W., Park H.C., Baek J.H., Kim C.W., Kim Y.C., Shin H.K. Study on the marine growth effect on the dynamic response of offshore wind turbine. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012, 13(7):1167-1176.
22. Manwell J.F., McGowan J.G., Rogers A.L. Wind energy explained 2004, John Wiley & Sons, England.
23. Morison J., O'Brien M., Johnson J., Schaaf S. The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Petroleum Transactions of AIME 1950, 189:149-157.
24. Merz KO, Moe G, Gudmestad OT. A review of hydrodynamic effects on bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Honolulu, USA; 2009.
25. Jonkman J.M., Butterfield S., Musial W., Scott G. Definition of a 5MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Technical report 2009, NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
26. Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Design of offshore wind turbine structures. Offshore standard DNV-OS-J101; 2010.