Social networks and political participation

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 16, Issue , 2013, Pages 33-48

  Campbell, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic duty; Education; Political ambivalence; Political engagement; Political knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877899529     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Almond G, Verba S. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study. Boston: Little, Brown
2. Anderson CJ, Paskeviciute A. 2005. Macro-politics andmicro-behavior: mainstream politics and the frequency of political discussion in contemporary democracies. In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, ed. AS Zuckerman, pp. 228- 50. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
3. Berelson BR, Lazarsfeld P, McPheeWN. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
4. Blais A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh
5. Brady HE, Schlozman KL, Verba S. 1999. Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93:153- 68
6. Campbell A, Converse PE, MillerWE, Stokes DE. 1960. The American Voter. New York:Wiley
7. Campbell A, Gurin G, MillerWE. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson
8. Campbell DE. 2006. WhyWe Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Princeton,NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
9. Campbell DE. 2009. Civic engagement and education: An empirical test of the sorting model. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 3:771- 86
10. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 2007. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:370- 79 (Pubitemid 47124137)
11. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 2008a. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:2249- 58 (Pubitemid 351724454)
12. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 2008b. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. Brit. Med. J. 337:a2338
13. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:S95- S120
14. Coleman JS. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
15. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. D Apter, pp. 206- 61. Glencoe, IL: Macmillan
16. Converse PE. 1972. Change in the American electorate. In The Human Meaning of Social Change, ed. A Campbell, PE Converse, pp. 261- 337. New York: Russell Sage Found
17. Davenport TC. 2010. Public accountability and political participation: Effects of a face-to-face feedback intervention on voter turnout of public housing residents. Polit. Behav. 32:337- 68
18. Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
19. Djupe PA, Gilbert CP. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
20. Finifter AW. 1974. The friendship group as a protective environment for political deviants.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 68:607- 25
21. Fowler JH. 2005. Turnout in a small world. In The Social Logic of Politics, ed. AS Zuckerman, pp. 269- 88 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
22. Fowler JH, HeaneyM, Nickerson DW, Padgett J, Sinclair B. 2011. Causality in political networks. Am. Polit. Res. 39:437- 80
23. Galston WA. 2001. Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 4:217- 34
24. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:33- 48
25. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW. 2010. An experiment testing the relative effectiveness of encouraging voter participation by inducing feelings of pride or shame. Polit. Behav. 32:409- 22
26. Gimpel JG, Lay JC, Schuknecht JE. 2003. Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America.Washington, DC: Brookings Inst
27. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:1360- 81
28. Helliwell J, Putnam RD. 2007. Education and social capital. East. Econ. J. 33:1- 19
29. Huckfeldt R, Mendez JM, Osborn T. 2004. Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Polit. Psychol. 25:65- 95 (Pubitemid 38254556)
30. Huckfeldt R, Sprague J. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
31. Issenberg S. 2012. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Crown
32. Klofstad CA. 2007. Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Polit. Res. Q. 60:180- 91
33. Klofstad CA. 2009. Civic talk and civic participation: The moderating effect of individual predispositions. Am. Polit. Res. 37:856- 78
34. Klofstad CA. 2010. The lasting effect of civic talk on civic participation: Evidence from a panel study. Soc. Forces 88:2353- 75
35. Klofstad CA. 2011. Civic Talk: Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
36. Knack S. 1992. Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout. Ration. Soc. 4:133- 56
37. Knack S, Kropf ME. 1998. For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting. Polit. Psychol. 19:585- 99
38. Lazersfeld PF, Berelson B, Gaudet H. 1948. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 2nd e.d.
39. Lazer D. 2011. Networks in political science: Back to the future. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 44:61- 68
40. Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi AL, et al. 2009. Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science 323:721- 23
41. Lim C. 2008. Social networks and political participation: How do networks matter? Soc. Forces 87:961- 82
42. Lyons R. 2011. The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social network analysis. Stat. Polit. Policy 2: Iss. 1, Article 2. http://www. degruyter.com/view/j/spp.2011.2.issue-1/spp.2011.2.1.1024/spp.2011.2.1.1024.xml
43. Macedo S, Alex-Assensoh Y, Berry JA, Brintnall M, Campbell DE, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It.Washington, DC: Brookings Inst
44. Mann C. 2010. Is there backlash to social pressure? A large-scale field experiment on voter mobilization. Polit. Behav. 32:387- 407
45. McAdam D, Paulsen R. 1993. Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. Am. J. Sociol. 99:640- 67
46. McClurg SD. 2006. The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50:737- 54 (Pubitemid 43823239)
47. Mutz DC. 2002a. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:838- 55
48. Mutz DC. 2002b. Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:111- 26
49. Mutz DC. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
50. Nickerson DW. 2008. Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:49- 57
51. Nickerson DW. 2009. Experimental approaches to the diffusion of norms. In Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching In, ed. VO Bartkus, JH Davis, pp. 186- 204. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
52. Nie NH, Junn J, Stehlik-Berry K. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
53. Nir L. 2005. Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 17:422- 42 (Pubitemid 41795274)
54. Noel H, Nyhan B. 2011. The "unfriending problem": The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Soc. Networks 33:211- 18
55. Oliver JE. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
56. Panagopoulos C. 2010. Affect, social pressure and prosocial motivation: Field experimental evidence of the mobilizing effects of pride, shame, and publicizing voting behavior. Polit. Behav. 32:369- 86
57. Persson M. 2011. An empirical test of the relative education model in Sweden. Polit. Behav. 33:455- 78
58. Putnam RD. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press
59. Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
60. Putnam RD, Campbell DE. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides And Unites Us. New York: Simon& Schuster
61. RikerW, Ordeshook PC. 1968. A theory of the calculus of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 62:25- 42
62. Rosenstone SJ,Hansen JM. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America.New York:Macmillan
63. Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. 2011. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40:211- 39
64. Siegel DA. 2009. Social networks and collective action. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 53:122- 38
65. Sinclair B, McConnell M, Green DP. 2012. Detecting spillover effects: Design and analysis of multi-level experiments. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56:1055- 69
66. Tenn S. 2005. An alternative measure of relative education to explain voter turnout. J. Polit. 67:271- 82 (Pubitemid 41602129)
67. Verba S,Nie NH. 1972. Participation in America: PoliticalDemocracy and Social Equality.Chicago: Univ.Chicago Press
68. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
69. Wolfinger RE, Rosenstone SJ. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
70. Zuckerman AS. 2005. Returning to the social logic of politics. In The Social Logic of Politics, ed. AS Zuckerman, pp. 3- 20. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press