Regional innovation patterns and the eu regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies

Growth and Change

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 355-389

  Camagni, Roberto ^a   Capello, Roberta ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; POLICY REFORM; POLICY STRATEGY; REGIONAL POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 84877883697     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: 14682257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12012     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Acs, Z., D. Audretsch, and M. Feldman 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics 76(2): 336-340.
2. Acs Z.J., D.B. Audretsch, P. Braunerhjelm, and B. Carlsson 2004. The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. CEPR Discussion Paper 4783.
3. Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs 2000. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science 79(4): 435-443.
4. Antonelli, C. 1989. A failure inducement model of research and development expenditure: Italian evidence from the early 1980s. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12(2): 159-180.
5. Asheim, B., R. Boschma, and Ph. Cooke 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge base. Regional Studies 45(7): 893-904.
6. Audretsch, D., and M. Feldman 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review 86(3): 630-640.
7. Balconi, M., S. Brusoni, and L. Orsenigo 2010. In defense of a linear model. Research Policy 39: 1-13.
8. Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for the Reformed Cohesion Policy. Report to the Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels, April.
9. Basile, R., R. Capello, and R. Caragliu 2012. Technological interdependence and regional growth in Europe. Papers in Regional Science 91(4): 697-722.
10. Bellet M., G. Colletis, Y. Lung 1993. Introduction au numéro spécial sur économie et proximité. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 3: 357-361.
11. Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation. A critical survey. Regional Studies 39(1): 61-74.
12. Camagni, R. 1991. Technological change, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards dynamic theory of economic space. In Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives, ed. R. Camagni, 121-144. London: Belhaven-Pinter.
13. Camagni, R. 2001. Policies for spatial development. In Territorial outlook, ed. OECD, 147-169, Ch. 6, Paris: OECD.
14. OECD. 2008. Towards a conclusion: Regional and territorial policy recommendations. In Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe, ed. R. Capello, R. Camagni, U. Fratesi, and B. Chizzolini, 283-306. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
15. OECD. 2011. Local Knowledge, National Vision: Challenges and Prospect for the EU Regional Policy, Post-Seminar Publication, Polish Ministry of Regional Development, Ostróda, 18-19 July.
16. Camagni, R., and R. Capello 2002. Milieux innovateurs and Collective learning: From concepts to measurement. In The emergence of the knowledge economy, ed. Z.J. Acs, H.L.F. de Groot, and P. Nijkamp, 15-46. Berlin: Springer.
17. Camagni, R., and R. Capello 2009. Knowledge-based economy and knowledge creation: The role of space. In Growth and competitiveness in innovative regions: Balancing internal and external connections, ed. U. Fratesi, and L. Senn, 145-166. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
18. Camagni, R., and R. Capello 2011. Macroeconomic and territorial policies for regional development: Theory and empirical evidence from the EU. In Endogenous regional development: Perspective, measurement and empirical investigations, ed. B. Stimson, R. Stough, and P. Nijkamp, 204-236. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19. Camagni, R., and D. Maillat, eds. 1995. Milieux innovateurs. Théories et politiques. Paris: Economica.
20. Capello, R. 1999. Spatial transfer of knowledge in high-technology milieux: Learning vs. collective learning processes. Regional Studies 33(4): 353-365.
21. Capello, R. 2009. Spatial spillovers and regional growth: A cognitive approach. European Planning Studies 17(5): 639-658.
22. Capello, R. 2012. Territorial patterns of innovation. In La città nell'economia della conoscenza, ed. R. Cappellin, F. Ferlaino, and P. Rizzi, 51-79. Milan: Franco Angeli.
23. Capello, R., and A. Caragliu 2012. Proximities and the intensity of scientific relations: Synergies and non-linearities, Paper presented at the Tinbergen Institute Seminar, Amsterdam, 7-8 May.
24. Capello, R., and C. Lenzi 2012. Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science. Published online, doi:10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8.
25. Cappellin, R. 2003. Networks and technological change in regional clusters. In Innovation clusters in interregional competition, ed. J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, and R. Soltwedel, pp. 53-78. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
26. Cooke, P. 2009. The knowledge economy, spillovers, proximity and specialization, Brussels: JRC, European Commission, Directoral General for Research, 29-39.
27. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11: 147-162.
28. EC-Commission of the European Communities. 2010a. Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Suitable and Inclusive Growth, Communication from the Commission, COM(2010)2020.
29. EC-Commission of the European Communities. 2010b. Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, COM(2010)553, Brussels.
30. EC-Commission of the European Communities. 2012. Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Smart Specialization Platform, May. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=a39fd20b-9fbc-402b-be8c-b51d03450946&groupId=10157 (accessed October 2012).
31. Edgerton, D. 2004. The linear model did not exist. reflections on the history and historiography of science and research in industry in the twentieth century. In The science industry nexus, ed. K. Grandin, N. Worms, and S. Widmalm, 31-57. Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications.
32. ESPON KIT. 2012. Knowledge, innovation, territory (KIT), Final Report available on line http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/kit.html (accessed October 2012).
33. Foray, D. 2009. Understanding smart specialisation. In The question of R&D specialisation, ed. D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, and R. Bavel, 19-28. Brussels: JRC, European Commission, Directoral General for Research.
34. Foray, D., P. David, and B. Hall 2009. Smart specialisation-the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n. 9, 1-5, Brussels.
35. Giannitsis, T. 2009. Technology and specialization: Strategies, options, risks. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n. 8, 1-7, Brussels.
36. Hägerstrand, T. 1967. Aspects of the spatial structure of social communication and the diffusion of innovation. Papers of the Regional Science Association 16: 27-42.
37. von Hayek, F.A. 1978. Competition as a discovery procedure. In New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas, ed. F. Hayek, 179-190. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 577-598.
39. JRC-Merit. 2009. Regional innovation scoreboard-RIS 2009, Pro Inno Europe Paper n. 14, Entreprise and Industry Magazine, Brussels.
40. Keeble, D., and F. Wilkinson 1999. Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high-technology SMS in Europe. Regional Studies 33(4): 295-303.
41. Licht, G. 2009. How to better diffuse technologies in Europe. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. n. 7, 1-5, Brussels.
42. Lundvall, B.A., and B. Johnson 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1(1): 23-42.
43. MacDonald, S. 1987. British science parks: Reflections on the politics of high technology. R&D Management 17(1): 25-37.
44. Malecki, E. 1980. Corporate organisation of R&D and the location of technological activities. Regional Studies 14(3): 219-234.
45. Massey, D., P. Quintas, and D. Wield 1992. High tech fantasies: Science parks in society, science and space. London: Routledge.
46. McCann, P., and R. Ortega-Argilés 2011. Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Document de treball de l'IEB 2011/14, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona.
47. Metcalfe, J. 1981. Impulse and diffusion in the study of technological change. Futures 13(5 Special Issue): 347-359.
48. Monk, C.S.P., R.B. Porter, P. Quintas, D. Storey, and P. Wynarczyk 1988. Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. London: Croom Helm.
49. Mowery, C.D., and N. Rosenberg 1998. Path of innovation: Technological change in 20th century America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50. Nelson, R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy 67(3): 297-306.
51. Nelson, R., and S. Winter 1977. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6: 36-76.
52. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010. Typology of regional innovation systems. 20th session of the working party on Territorial Indicators.
53. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. Territorial Outlook, Paris.
54. Pontikakis, D., G. Chorafakis, and D. Kyriakou 2009. R&D specialization in Europe: From stylized observations to evidence-based policy. In The question of R&D specialisation, ed. D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, and R. van Bavel, 71-84. Brussels: JRC, European Commission, Directoral General for Research.
55. Quévit, M., and P. van Doren 1997. The problem of innovatie milieux and territorial structural adjustment policies. In The dynamics of innovative regions-The GREMI approach, ed. R. Ratti, A. Bramanti, and R. Gordon, 343-365. Aldershot: Ashgate.
56. Rallet, A., and A. Torre, eds. 1995. Économie Industrielle et Économie Spatiale, 273-293. Paris: Economica.
57. Saxenian, A. 1996. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Storey, D.J., and B.S. Tether 1998. Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy 26(9): 1037-1057.
59. Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34: 1203-1219.
60. Trippl, M. 2010. Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie (TESG) 101(2): 150-160.
61. UNU-Merit. 2010. The regional impact of technological change in 2020. Synthesis Report of Framework Service Contract 150083-2005-02-BE, DG-Regio.