Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between whole-body diffusion MRI and bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases;Accuratezza diagnostica e concordanza tra diffusione whole-body e scintigrafia ossea nell'identificazione delle metastasi ossee

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 465-475

  Stecco, A ^a   Lombardi, M ^a   Leva, L ^a   Brambilla, M ^a   Negru, E ^a   Delli Passeri, S ^a   Carriero, A ^a  

^a MAGGIORE DELLA CARITÀ HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone metastasis; Magnetic resonance DWIBS; Scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; TECHNETIUM DERIVATIVE; TECHNETIUM TC 99M DIPHOSPHONATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE TUMOR; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

ADULT; BONE NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DIPHOSPHONATES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877874648     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0870-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Balliu E, Boada M, Peláez I et al (2010) Comparative study of wholebody MRI and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases. Clin Radiol 65:989-996
2. Keenan WF Jr, Fedullo LM, Robb ME, Plotkin GR (1992) The bone scan in primary care: diagnostic pitfalls. J Am Board Fam Pract 5:63-67
3. Wüppenhorst N, Maier C, Frettlöh J at al (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of 3-phase bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome of the upper extremity. Clin J Pain 3:182-189
4. Cascini G, Falcone F, Greco C et al (2008) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for detecting bone metastases: comparison with bone scintigraphy. Radiol Med 113:1157-1170
5. Thomas C, Kwee TC, Takahara T et al (2008) Diffusion weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937-1952
6. Nakanishi K, Kobayashi M, Takahoshi S et al (2005) Whole body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: comparison with bone scintigrams. Magn Reson Med Sci 4(1):11-17
7. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU et al (2004) Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology 233:139-148
8. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213-220
9. Nakanishi K, Kobayashi M, Nakaguchi K et al (2007) Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images Magn Reson Med Sci 6:147-155
10. Wu LM, Gu HY, Zheng J at al (2011) Diagnostic value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:128-135
11. Barceló J, Vilanova JC, Riera E et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted wholebody MRI (virtual PET) in screening for osseous metastases. Radiology 49:407-415
12. Takenaka D, Ohno Y, Matsumoto K et al (2009) Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI. Whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:298-308
13. Stecco A, Romano G, Negru M at al (2009) Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in staging of oncological patients: comparison with positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) in a pilot study. Radiol Med 114:1-17