Whole-body MR imaging: Evaluation of patients for metastases

Radiology

Volumn 233, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 139-148

  Lauenstein, Thomas C ^a   Goehde, Susanne C ^a   Herborn, Christoph U ^a   Goyen, Matthias ^a   Oberhoff, Carsten ^a   Debatin, Jörg F ^a   Ruehm, Stefan C ^a   Barkhausen, Jörg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), technology; Neoplasms, diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BRAIN METASTASIS; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER METASTASIS; LUNG METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHOLE BODY SCINTISCANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE NEOPLASMS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 4644293916     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2331030777     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. World Health Organization. Press release: cancer toll can be reduced dramatically. October 16, 1998; 72.
2. Van den Brekel MW. Lymph node metastases: CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2000; 33:230-238.
3. Johnson KM, Leavitt GD, Kayser HW. Total-body MR imaging in as little as 18 seconds. Radiology 1997; 202:262-267.
4. Barkhausen J, Quick HH, Lauenstein T, et al. Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a continuously rolling table platform: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 220:252-256.
5. Horvath LJ, Burtness BA, McCarthy S, Johnson KM. Total-body echo-planar MR imaging in the staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional methods-early experience. Radiology 1999; 211:119-128.
6. Walker R, Kessar P, Blanchard R, et al. Turbo STIR magnetic resonance imaging as a whole-body screening tool for metastases in patients with breast carcinoma: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:343-350.
7. O'Connell MJ, Hargaden G, Powell T, Eustace SJ. Whole-body turbo short tau inversion recovery MR imaging using a moving tabletop. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:866-868.
8. Lauenstein TC, Freudenberg LS, Goehde SC, et al. Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2091-2099.
9. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, et al. Three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold MR imaging for whole-body tumor staging in less than 15 minutes: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:445-449.
10. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, et al. Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002; 224:270-277.
11. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Quick HH et al. Whole-body MRA on a rolling table platform (AngioSURF). Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000; 172:670-674.
12. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999; 212:876-684.
13. Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM, et al. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology 2000; 215:365-372.
14. Hawighorst H, Schoenbeig SO, Knopp MV, Essig M, Miltner P, van Kaick G. Hepatic lesions: morphologic and functional characterization with multiphase breath-hold 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210: 89-96.
15. Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, Schlemmer HP, Hansmann J, van Kaick G. Multiphase, contrast-enhanced 3D-MR angiography for morphological and functional focal lesion detection: initial results. Radiologe 1999; 39:671-677.
16. Seemann MD, Seemann O, Luboldt W, et al. Differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions using chest radiography, spiral CT and HRCT. Lung Cancer 2000; 29:105-124.
17. Hatabu H, Gaa J, Tadamura E, et al. MR imaging of pulmonary parenchyma with a half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequence. Eur J Radiol 1999; 29: 152-159.
18. Yamashita Y, Yokoyama T, Tomiguchi S, Takahashi M, Ando M. MR imaging of focal lung lesions: elimination of flow and motion artifacts by breath-hold ECG-gated and black-blood techniques on T2-weighted turbo SE and STIR sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:691-698.
19. Madore B, Pelc NJ. SMASH and SENSE experimental and numerical comparisons. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45:1103-1111.
20. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:1202-1210.
21. Algra PR, Bloem JL, Tissing H, Falke TH, Arndt JW, Verboom LJ. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. RadioGraphics 1991; 11:219-232.
22. Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, et al. A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1655-1661.