Consulting stakeholders? Assessing stakeholder consultations in the European energy policy

Sustainable Systems and Energy Management at the Regional Level: Comparative Approaches

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 328-349

  Vasileiadou, Eleftheria ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877869534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-344-7.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Alberts, D. J. (2007). Stakeholders or subject matter experts, who should be consulted? Energy Policy, 35, 2336-2346. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.006
2. Albrecht, J., & Arts, B. (2005). Climate policy convergence in Europe: an assessment based on National Communications to the UNFCCC. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 885-902. doi:10.1080/13501760500161571
3. Appelstrand, M. (2002). Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 281-290. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00070-9
4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 35, 216-224.
5. Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (1999). Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: The Free Press.
6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
7. Bomberg, E. (2007). Policy learning in an enlarged European Union: environmental NGOs and new policy instruments. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 248-268. doi:10.1080/13501760601122522
8. Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2007). Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 346-365. doi:10.1080/13501760701243749
9. Coen, D. (2005). Business-Regulatory Relations: Learning to Play Regulatory Games in European Utility Markets. Governance, 18(3), 375-398. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00281.x
10. Collier, U. (1996). The European Union's climate change policy: Limiting emissions or limiting powers? Journal of European Public Policy, 3(1), 122-138. doi:10.1080/13501769608407021
11. Commission, E. (2001). European Governance. A White Paper. Retrieved. from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf.
12. Commission, E. (2002). Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment (No. COM(2002) 276 final). Brussels: European Commission.
13. Commission, E. (2006). GREEN PAPER: A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy (No. COM(2006) 105 final). Brussels: European Commission.
14. Commission, E. (2007). An Energy Policy for Europe (Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament). Commission of the European Communities.
15. Commission, E. (2008). Second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union. Brussels.
16. Delanghe, H., & Muldur, U. (2007). Ex-Ante impact assessment of research programmes: the experience of the European Union's 7th Framework Programme. Science & Public Policy, 34(3), 169-183. doi:10.3152/030234207X218125
17. Driessen, P., Glasbergen, P., & Verdaas, C. (2001). Interactive policy-making. A model for management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 322-337. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00075-8
18. Eberlein, B., & Newman, A. L. (2008). Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovermental Networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25-52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00384.x
19. Eising, R. (2007). The access of business interests to EU institutions: towards élite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 384-403. doi:10.1080/13501760701243772
20. Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation. Governance, 20(2), 305-324. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00358.x
21. Fischer, G. (2005). Distances and Diversity: Sources for Social Creativity. Paper presented at the Creativity and Cognition, London, UK.
22. Genoud, C., Finger, M., & Aarentsen, M. (2004). Energy regulation: convergence through multi-level technocracy. In Finon, D., & Midttun, A. (Eds.), Reshaping European Gas and Electricity Industries: Regulation, Markets, and Business Strategies (pp. 111-128). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-008044550-2/50007-5
23. Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490934
24. Healey, P., Magahlaes, C. d., Madanipour, A., & Pendlebury, J. (2003). Place, identity and local politics: policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In H. M. A. & W. H. (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 88-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Héritier, A. (2003). New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness? In Börzel, T. A., & Cichowski, R. A. (Eds.), The state of the European Union: law, politics, and society (pp. 105-126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, R., Dunn, W., & Ravetz, J. (Eds.). (2001). Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
27. Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2001). Problem Solving by Heterogenous Agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 123-163. doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2709
28. Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16385-16389. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101
29. Hove, S. d. (2000). Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study. Ecological Economics, 33, 457-472. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00165-2
30. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hajer & W. H. (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 33-59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Klein, R. J. T., Lisa, E., Schipper, F., & Dessai, S. (2005). Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(6), 579-588. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010
32. Kok, M. T. J., & Coninck, H. C. d. (2007). Widening the scope of policies to address climate change: directions for mainstreaming. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(7-8), 587-599. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.003
33. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance. New Government Society interactions. London: Sage.
34. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
35. Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (Eds.). (1991). Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
36. Michalowitz, I. (2007). What determines influence? Assessing conditions for decision-making influence of interest groups in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 132-151. doi:10.1080/13501760601072719
37. Nilsson, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2005). Towards climate policy integration in the EU: evolving dilemmas and opportunities. Climate Policy, 5, 363-376.
38. OECD. (2004). Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) Inventory: Note by the Secretariat. Paris: OECD.
39. Radaelli, C. M. (2005). Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 924-943. doi:10.1080/13501760500161621
40. Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2005). Coordinated European Governance: Self-organizing or centrally steered? Public Administration, 83(1), 201-220. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00444.x
41. Smismans, S. (2003). European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests. European Law Journal, 9(4), 473-495. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00187
42. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network Governance and Post-Liberal Democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197-237.
43. Vasileiadou, E., & Safarzynska, K. (2010). Transitions: Taking complexity seriously. Futures, 42(10), 1176-1186. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.07.001
44. Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendrinks, F., & Lohmann, S. (2006). Clumsy solutions for complex world: The case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817-843. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1
45. Webster, F. (2006). The Information Society Revisited. In Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingston, S. (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media. Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs. Updated Student Edition (pp. 443-457). London: Sage.
46. Welp, M., Vega-Reinert, A. l., Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Jaeger, C. C. (2006). Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools. Global Environmental Change, 16, 170-181. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.002