Accounting for the environmental impacts of Texaco's operations in Ecuador: Chevron's contingent environmental liability disclosures

Accounting Forum

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 110-123

  Buccina, Stacie ^a   Chene, Douglas ^a   Gramlich, Jeffrey ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

^b Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Chevron; ChevronTexaco; Ecuador; Environmental liability; Environmental remediation; Financial disclosure; Legitimacy theory; Stakeholder theory; Texaco

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877833555     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alpern, S. (2009). Chevron liability in Ecuador pollution case approaches $27 Billion. Trillium Asset Management, 18 May 2009, Retrieved 31 May 2009 from http://trilliuminvest.com/news-articles-category/cover-story-news-articles/chevron-liability-in-ecuador-pollution-case-approaches-27-billion/.
2. Alvaro M., Gonzalez A. Corporate news: judge in Chevron dispute says video doctored. The Wall Street Journal 2009, 2 September.
3. Amazon Defense Coalition (2009a). Chevron Charged with Engaging in Intense Lobbying Battle to Defeat Shareholder Resolution, but Results Mixed for Company, 27 May 2009. Retrieved 15 June 2009 from http://www.amazonwatch.org/newsroom/view_news.php?id=1821.
4. Amazon Defense Coalition (2009b). Understanding Chevron's "Amazon Chernobyl." Winter 2009. Retrieved 23 May 2009 from http://amazonwatch.org/documents/ecuador-press-kit/detailed-background.pdf.
5. Amazon Defense Coalition (2012). 40 Institutional Investors Demand Chevron Settle Ecuador Environmental Case, Says Amazon Defense Coalition, May 28, 2012. Retrieved 28 May, 2012 from http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/28/4521588/40-institutional-investors-demand.html.
6. Amnesty International Chevron (CVX) in the Amazon-oil rights or human rights? Texaco's legacy, Chevron's responsibility 2009, Retrieved 28 May 2009, from http://www.amnestyusa.org/business-and-human-rights/chevron-corp/chevron-in-ecuador/page.do?id=1101670.
7. Barthold J., Krauss C. ChevronTexaco prepares for battle in jungle courthouse 2004, Corporate Legal Times, February 2004.
8. Bauer, B. (2006). Correlating proxy advisory firm recommendations with voting results. Sustainability Investment News, 20 June 2006. Retrieved 17 June 2009 from http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/2037.html.
9. BBC (2007). Amazon natives sue oil giant. Newsnight, 27 November 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2010 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/7113903.stm.
10. Cabrera Vega R. Technical summary report: Expert opinion 2008, 24 March 2008. Retrieved 12 November 2010 from http://chevrontoxico.com/assets/docs/cabrera-english-2008.pdf.
11. Casselman, B., Ordonez, I., and, Gonzalez, A. Chevron hit with record judgment. Wall Street Journal, 15 February 2011. Retrieved 29 December 2011 from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703584804576144464044068664.html#printMode.
12. CBS News (2009). Amazon Crude. 60 Minutes television news program, 3 May 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2010 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/01/60minutes/main4983549.shtml.
13. Chen J., Roberts R. Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization-society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 97:651-665.
14. Chevron (2008). Chevron statement responding to the Government of Ecuador's offer to mediate in ongoing trial. Retrieved from http://investor.chevron.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130102&p=irol-newsArticle_Print&ID=1187833&highlight=.
15. Chevron (2008). Chevron 2007 Annual Report. Retrieved 29 May 2009 from http://www.chevron.com/annualreport/2007/documents/pdf/Chevron2007AnnualReport_full.pdf.
16. Chevron Chevron 2008 annual report 2009, Retrieved 29 May 2009, http://www.chevron.com/annualreport/2008/documents/pdf/Chevron2008AnnualReport_full.pdf, p. 75.
17. Chevron Ecuador lawsuit - judicial misconduct: Video tapes implicate judge Núñez 2009, Retrieved 19 June 2010, from http://www.chevron.com/ecuador/background/judicialmisconduct/.
18. Chevron Video transcript from Chevron web page, Ecuador lawsuit - judicial misconduct: Video tapes implicate judge Núñez 2009, Retrieved 21 June 2010 from http://www.chevron.com/media/ecuadoraugust/Meeting3Transcript.pdf.
19. Chevron (2010a). Chevron 2009 Annual Report, 25 February 2010. Retrieved 21 June 2010 from http://www.chevron.com/annualreport/2009/documents/pdf/Chevron2009AnnualReport_full.pdf.
20. Chevron (2010b). Chevron highlights safety and performance at annual meeting of stockholders Chevron press release, 26 May 2010. Retrieved 12 November 2010 from http://investor.chevron.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130102&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1431478&highlight=.
21. Cho C., Patten D. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2007, 32:639-647.
22. Deegan C. The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15:282-311.
23. Deegan C., Rankin M. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1996, 9:50-67.
24. Desir R., Fanning K., Pfeiffer R. Are revisions to SFAS No 5 needed?. Accounting Horizons 2010, 24(4):525-545.
25. Donziger S. The Chevron way: In an Ecuador legal battle, the oil giant gives U.S. companies a bad name 2009, Forbes.com. 16 September 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2010, from http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/16/chevron-texaco-crude-amazon-ecuador-opinions-contributors-steven-donziger.html.
26. Edelman Edelman trust barometer 2011, Retrieved 8 March 2012 from Retrieved 27 May 2009 from http://www.edelman.com/trust/2011/.
27. Elijido-Ten E. Can stakeholder theory add to our understanding of Malaysian environmental reporting attitudes?. Malaysian Accounting Review 2009, 8:85-110.
28. Ellin A., Krauss C. Suit says ChevronTexaco dumped poisons in Ecuador 2003, New York Times, 8 May 2003.
29. Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450-20 2009, Retrieved 27 May 2009 from http://www.fasb.org/st/#fas25.
30. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach 1984, Pitman, Boston, MA.
31. Gelsi, S. (2009). Pension funds reportedly worried over Chevron suit. Market Watch, 8 April 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2009 from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chevron-court-case-ecuador-gains.
32. Global Exchange (2003). Two U.S. Senators express concern over Chevron lobbying. Global Exchange. February 10, 2006. Retrieved 14 September 2010 from http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/ecuador/3755.html.
33. GlobeScan GlobeScan salon briefing: CSR in the economic crisis 2009, February 2009. Retrieved 9 March 2012 from, http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/salon_lon-0109.
34. Gray Rob, et al. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1995, 8:47-77.
35. Hendricks, T. (2003). Company accused in class-action lawsuit of despoiling Amazon Region with crude. San Francisco Chronicle. 21 October 2003. Retrieved 1 December 2009 from http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/10/21/MNGCE2FS6G1.DTL.
36. Isikoff, M. (2008). A $16 Billion problem: Chevron hires lobbyists to squeeze Ecuador in toxic-dumping case. What an Obama win could mean. Newsweek. 26 July 2008. Retrieved 15 September 2010 from http://www.newsweek.com/2008/07/25/a-16-billion-problem.html.
37. Kaplan, L.A. (2010). Memorandum Opinion. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, May 6, 2010.
38. Kenney C. Disaster in the Amazon: Dodging 'Boomerang Suits' in transnational human rights litigation. California Law Review 2009, 97:857-904.
39. Kimerling J. Indigenous peoples and the oil frontier in Amazonia: The case of Ecuador, ChevronTexaco, and Aguinda v. Texaco. International Law and Politics 2006, 38:413-664. November 2006.
40. Lambert L. At the crossroads of environmental and human rights standards: Aquinda v. Texaco, Inc. Using the Alien Tort Claims Act to hold multinational corporate violators of international laws accountable in U.S. courts. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 2000, 10:109-132.
41. Lee T., Hutchinson P. The decision to disclose environmental information: A research review and agenda. Advances in Accounting 2005, 21:83-111.
42. Lifsher, M. (2003). Chevron would face $5 billion tab for Amazon cleanup, expert says. The Wall Street Journal. 30 October 2003.
43. Magness V. Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2006, 19:540-563.
44. Mahadeo J.D., et al. Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004-2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum 2011, 35:158-175.
45. Mobus J. Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2005, 18:492-517.
46. Neumeister, L., Chevron asks court to block $9.5B Ecuadorean award. The Seattle Times, 18 February 2011. Retrieved 29 December from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014266413_apusecuadorchevron.html.
47. New York Times (1980). Settlers struggle for a new life in Ecuador's jungle, New York Times, October 12, 1980, p. 21.
48. O'Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15:344-371.
49. Patten D. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1992, 17:471-475.
50. Powers B., Quarles M. Texaco's waste management practices in Ecuador were illegal and violated industry standards 2006, 5 April 2006. Retrieved 31 December 2009 from http://www.etechinternational.org/new_pdfs/chevron_texaco/CustomaryPractices_Submission2_FINALEngl_tocourt.pdf.
51. Reuters (2007). Chevron shareholders reject environmental proposal. Reuters, 25 April 2007. Retrieved 28 May 2009 from http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN2530557820070425.
52. Reuters (2009). US Senators seek Chevron/Ecuador trial without US meddling. Reuters, 26 June 2009. Retrieved 14 September 2010 from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2635126920090627.
53. Roberts R. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1992, 17:596-612.
54. Romero, S. &, Krauss C. (2009a). Under pressure, Ecuadorian judge steps aside in suit against Chevron. New York Times. 5 Sep 2009.
55. Romero, S., & Krauss C. (2009a). Under pressure, Ecuadorian judge steps aside in suit against Chevron, New York Times, 5 Sep 2009.
56. Securities and Exchange Commission (2001). Division of Corporate Finance-Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14: Shareholder Proposals, 13 July 2001. Retrieved 8 September 2010 from http://www.sec.gov/interps/legal/cfslb14.htm.
57. Smith, M., & Gullo, K., (2008). Texaco toxic past haunts Chevron as judgment looms, Bloomberg.com. 30 December 2008. Retrieved 1 January 2010 from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a_lJWUAmsu8c.
58. Suchman M. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-610.
59. The Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire (2005). Chevron shareholders submit resolution addressing Ecuadorian contamination controversy, 1 Dec. 2005. Retrieved 30 May 2009 from http://www.csrwire.com/press/press_release/21298-Chevron-Shareholders-Submit-Resolution-Addressing-Ecuadorian-Contamination-Controversy.
60. Ullmann A. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review 1985, 10(3):540-557.
61. Universo, El, Nuevo juez manejará litigio ambiental de Texaco, 23 February 2010. Retrieved 25 August 2010, from http://www.eluniverso.com/2010/02/23/1/1356/nuevo-juez-manejara-litigio-ambiental-texaco.html and translated to English using Google Chrome (translated article title "New judge will handle environmental litigation Texaco".
62. United States Department of State (2011). Background Note: Ecuador, June 8, 2011. Retrieved March 9, 2012 from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35761.htm.
63. Vogel, K. (2009). Chevron's lobby campaign backfires. Politico.com 16 November 2009. Retrieved 12 November 2010 from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29560.html.
64. Walden W.D., Schwartz B. Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1997, 16:125-154.