Learning with recursive perceptual representations

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 4, Issue , 2012, Pages 2825-2833

  Vinyals, Oriol ^a   Jia, Yangqing ^a   Deng, Li ^b   Darrell, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; COMPACT REPRESENTATION; GENERALIZATION ABILITY; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL FEATURE SPACE; LINEAR SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; NONCONVEX OPTIMIZATION; NONLINEAR CLASSIFIERS; PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; METADATA; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84877777313     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. P L Bartlett and S Mendelson. Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:463-482, 2003.
2. O Boiman, E Shechtman, and M Irani. In defense of nearest-neighbor based image classification. In CVPR, 2008.
3. L Bourdev, S Maji, T Brox, and J Malik. Detecting people using mutually consistent poselet activations. In ECCV, 2010.
4. A Coates and A Ng. The importance of encoding versus training with sparse coding and vector quantization. In ICML, 2011.
5. W Cohen and V R de Carvalho. Stacked sequential learning. In IJCAI, 2005.
6. R Collobert, F Sinz, JWeston, and L Bottou. Trading convexity for scalability. In ICML, 2006.
7. N Dalal. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005.
8. S Davis and P Mermelstein. Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 28(4):357-366, 1980.
9. L Deng, M L Seltzer, D Yu, A Acero, A Mohamed, and G Hinton. Binary coding of speech spectrograms using a deep auto-encoder. In Interspeech, 2010.
10. L Deng and D Yu. Deep convex network: A scalable architecture for deep learning. In Interspeech, 2011.
11. L Deng, D Yu, and J Platt. Scalable stacking and learning for building deep architectures. In ICASSP, 2012.
12. L Fei-Fei and P Perona. A bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In CVPR, 2005.
13. G Hinton, L Deng, D Yu, G Dahl, A Mohamed, N Jaitly, A Senior, V Vanhoucke, P Nguyen, T Sainath, and B Kingsbury. Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28:82-97, 2012.
14. G Hinton and R Salakhutdinov. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786):504, 2006.
15. K Jarrett, K Kavukcuoglu, M A Ranzato, and Y LeCun. What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition? In ICCV, 2009.
16. T Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
17. Y Lin, T Zhang, S Zhu, and K Yu. Deep coding network. In NIPS, 2010.
18. D Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 2004.
19. S Maji, AC Berg, and J Malik. Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on, pages 1-8. Ieee, 2008.
20. A Mohamed, D Yu, and L Deng. Investigation of full-sequence training of deep belief networks for speech recognition. In Interspeech, 2010.
21. B Olshausen and D J Field. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1? Vision research, 37(23):3311-3325, 1997.
22. O Vinyals and L Deng. Are Sparse Representations Rich Enough for Acoustic Modeling? In Interspeech, 2012.
23. D H Wolpert. Stacked generalization. Neural networks, 5(2):241-259, 1992.
24. J Yang, K Yu, and Y Gong. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In CVPR, 2009.
25. J Yang, K Yu, and T Huang. Efficient highly over-complete sparse coding using a mixture model. In ECCV, 2010.
26. K Yu and T Zhang. Improved Local Coordinate Coding using Local Tangents. In ICML, 2010.