Factorial LDA: Sparse multi-dimensional text models

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 4, Issue , 2012, Pages 2582-2590

  Paul, Michael J ^a   Dredze, Mark ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERPRETABILITY; LATENT FACTOR; LATENT VARIABLE; LATENT VARIABLE MODELS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; RESEARCH TOPICS; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

SELF ORGANIZING MAPS;

EID: 84877774229     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. D. Blei, A. Ng, and M. Jordan. Latent Dirichlet allocation. JMLR, 2003.
2. Q. Mei, X. Ling, M. Wondra, H. Su, and C. Zhai. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In WWW, 2007.
3. M. Paul and R. Girju. A two-dimensional topic-aspect model for discovering multi-faceted topics. In AAAI, 2010.
4. J. Eisenstein, A. Ahmed, and E. P. Xing. Sparse additive generative models of text. In ICML, 2011.
5. W. Y. Wang, E. Mayfield, S. Naidu, and J. Dittmar. Historical analysis of legal opinions with a sparse mixed-effects latent variable model. In ACL, pages 740-749, July 2012.
6. J. Chang, J. Boyd-Graber, S. Gerrish, C. Wang, and D. Blei. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In NIPS, 2009.
7. D. Mimno and A. McCallum. Topic models conditioned on arbitrary features with dirichlet-multinomial regression. In UAI, 2008.
8. T. Griffiths and Z. Ghahramani. Infinite latent feature models and the Indian buffet process. In NIPS, 2006.
9. S. Williamson, C. Wang, K. Heller, and D. Blei. The IBP-compound dirichlet process and its application to focused topic modeling. In ICML, 2010.
10. A. Ahmed and E. P. Xing. Staying informed: supervised and semi-supervised multi-view topical analysis of ideological perspective. In EMNLP, pages 1140-1150, 2010.
11. M. Paul and R. Girju. Cross-cultural analysis of blogs and forums with mixed-collection topic models. In EMNLP, pages 1408-1417, August 2009.
12. D. Zhang, C. Zhai, J. Han, A. Srivastava, and N. Oza. Topic modeling for OLAP on multidimensional text databases: topic cube and its applications. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 2, 2009.
13. T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR, 1999.
14. S. Dasgupta and V. Ng. Mining clustering dimensions. In ICML, 2010.
15. I. Porteous, E. Bart, and M. Welling. Multi-HDP: a non parametric Bayesian model for tensor factorization. In AAAI, pages 1487-1490, 2008.
16. L. Mackey, D. Weiss, and M. I. Jordan. Mixed membership matrix factorization. In ICML, 2010.
17. G. E. Hinton. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput., 14:1771-1800, August 2002.
18. J. Boyd-Graber and D. Blei. Syntactic topic models. In NIPS, 2008.
19. M. R. Gormley, M. Dredze, B. Van Durme, and J. Eisner. Shared components topic models. In NAACL, 2010.
20. C. Wang and D. Blei. Decoupling sparsity and smoothness in the discrete hierarchical Dirichlet process. In NIPS, 2009.
21. L. Meier, S. van de Geer, and P. Bühlmann. The group lasso for logistic regression. Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series B, 70(1):53-71, 2008.
22. H. Wallach, D. Mimno, and A. McCallum. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. In NIPS, 2009.
23. T. Griffiths and M. Steyvers. Finding scientific topics. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004.
24. M. Rosen-Zvi, T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and P. Smyth. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In UAI, 2004.
25. Michael J. Paul. Mixed membership Markov models for unsupervised conversation modeling. In EMNLP-CoNLL, 2012.