A mechanistic model of early sensory processing based on subtracting sparse representations

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 3, Issue , 2012, Pages 1979-1987

  Druckmann, Shaul ^a   Hu, Tao ^a   Chklovskii, Dmitri B ^a  

^a Janelia Farm Research Campus ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INHIBITORY FEEDBACK; MECHANISTIC MODELS; NONLINEAR PREDICTIVE CODING; SENSORY PROCESSING; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; STIMULUS STATISTICS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TRANSIENT DYNAMICS;

BANDWIDTH COMPRESSION; DYNAMICS; ITERATIVE METHODS; NEURONS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

NONLINEAR FEEDBACK;

EID: 84877765360     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Barlow, H.B. and W.R. Levick, Threshold setting by the surround of cat retinal ganglion cells. The Journal of physiology, 1976. 259(3): p. 737-57.
2. Dong, D.W. and J.J. Atick, Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 1995. 6(3): p. 345-358.
3. Field, D.J., Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science, 1987. 4(12): p. 2379-94.
4. Ruderman, D.L. and W. Bialek, Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical review letters, 1994. 73(6): p. 814-817.
5. Elias, P., Predictive coding. Information Theory, IRE Transactions on, 1955. 1(1): p. 16-24.
6. Srinivasan, M.V., S.B. Laughlin, and A. Dubs, Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina, in Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci1982. p. 427-59.
7. Victor, J.D., Temporal aspects of neural coding in the retina and lateral geniculate. Network-Computation in Neural Systems, 1999. 10(4): p. R1-R66.
8. Hosoya, T., S.A. Baccus, and M. Meister, Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature, 2005. 436(7047): p. 71-7.
9. Huang, Y. and R.P.N. Rao, Predictive coding. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2011. 2(5): p. 580-593.
10. Laughlin, S., A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C: Biosciences, 1981. 36(9-10): p. 910-2.
11. Masland, R.H., The fundamental plan of the retina. Nature neuroscience, 2001. 4(9): p. 877-86.
12. Olsen, S.R., V. Bhandawat, and R.I. Wilson, Divisive normalization in olfactory population codes. Neuron, 2010. 66(2): p. 287-99.
13. Shepherd, G.M., et al., The olfactory granule cell: from classical enigma to central role in olfactory processing. Brain research reviews, 2007. 55(2): p. 373-82.
14. Arevian, A.C., V. Kapoor, and N.N. Urban, Activity-dependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nature neuroscience, 2008. 11(1): p. 80-7.
15. Baccus, S.A., Timing and computation in inner retinal circuitry. Annu Rev Physiol, 2007. 69: p. 271-90.
16. Rieke, F. and G. Schwartz, Nonlinear spatial encoding by retinal ganglion cells: when 1+1 not equal 2. Journal of General Physiology, 2011. 138(3): p. 283-290.
17. Shapley, R.M. and J.D. Victor, The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. The Journal of physiology, 1978. 285: p. 275-98.
18. Koulakov, A.A. and D. Rinberg, Sparse Incomplete Representations: A Potential Role of Olfactory Granule Cells. Neuron, 2011. 72(1): p. 124-136.
19. Lee, D.D. and H.S. Seung, Unsupervised learning by convex and conic coding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1997: p. 515-521.
20. Lochmann, T. and S. Deneve, Neural processing as causal inference. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2011.
21. Olshausen, B.A. and D.J. Field, Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1? Vision research, 1997. 37(23): p. 3311-25.
22. Rao, R.P.N. and D.H. Ballard, Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. nature neuroscience, 1999. 2: p. 79-87.
23. Osher, S., et al., Fast linearized Bregman iteration for compressive sensing and sparse denoising. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 2009.
24. Yin, W., et al., Bregman iterative algorithms for l1-minimization with applications to compressed sensing. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2008. 1(1): p. 143-168.
25. Zou, H. and T. Hastie, Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2005. 67(2): p. 301-320.
26. Dayan, P., Recurrent sampling models for the Helmholtz machine. Neural computation, 1999. 11(3): p. 653-78.
27. Rehn, M. and F.T. Sommer, A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields. Journal of computational neuroscience, 2007. 22(2): p. 135-46.
28. Rozell, C.J., et al., Sparse coding via thresholding and local competition in neural circuits. Neural computation, 2008. 20(10): p. 2526-63.
29. Bregman, L.M., The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming* 1. USSR computational mathematics and mathematical physics, 1967. 7(3): p. 200-217.