Incremental persuasion through microblogging: A survey of twitter users in Latvia

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Stibe, Agnis ^a   Oinas Kukkonen, Harri ^a   Berzina, Ilze ^b   Pahnila, Seppo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b TURIBA UNIVERSITY   (Latvia)

Author keywords

Attitude change; Behavioral patterns; Incremental; Microblogging; Persuasive systems design; Social influence; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE CHANGE; BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS; INCREMENTAL; MICROBLOGGING; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TWITTER;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84877752261     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2467803.2467811     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1, Blackwell Publishing.
2. Kumar, R., Novak, J., and Tomkins, A. 2006. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 20-23, 2006, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
3. Steiny, D. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2007. Network awareness: social network search, innovation and productivity in organisations. Int. J. Networking and Virtual Organisations, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 413-430.
4. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lyytinen, K. and Yoo, Y. 2010. Social Networks and Information Systems: Ongoing and Future Research Streams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 11, Special Issue, pp. 61-68.
5. Parameswaran, M. and Whinston, A. B. 2007. Research Issues in Social Computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 8: Iss. 6, Article 22.
6. Porter, J. 2008. Designing for the Social Web. New Riders Publishing Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
7. McFedries, P. 2007. Technically Speaking: All A-Twitter. IEEE Spectrum Magazine, Volume 44, pp. 84, October 2007.
8. Cialdini, R. B., and Trost, M. R. 1998. Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity, and Compliance. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 323-390.
9. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2010. Behavior Change Support Systems: The Next Frontier for Web Science. In proceedings of the Second International Web Science Conference (WebSci 10), Raleigh, NC, US, April 26-27, 2010.
10. Wright, J. S. and Warner, D. S. 1962. Advertising. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962. pp. 7.
11. Brembeck, W. L. and Howell, W. S. 1976. Persuasion, A Means of Social Influence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1976, pp. 19.
12. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. and McArdle, J. 1980. Changing the Behavior of Alcoholics: Effects of Persuasive Communication. In Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein (eds.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
13. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. and Wellman, B., 1997. Studying Online Social Networks. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, Volome 3, Issue 1.
14. Fogg, B. J. 2008. Mass interpersonal persuasion: An early view of a new phenomenon. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5033, Springer, 2008, pp. 23-34.
15. Weiksner, M. G., Fogg, B. J. and Liu, X. 2008. Six patterns for persuasion in online social networks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5033, Springer, pp. 151-163.
16. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, August 12-12, 2007, San Jose, California, pp. 56-65.
17. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P. and Arlitt, M. 2008. A few chirps about twitter. In proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks, August 18-18, 2008, Seattle, WA, USA.
18. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M. and Wu, F. 2009. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, peer-reviewed journal on the Internet, Volume 14, Number 1 - 5 January 2009.
19. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. and Moon, S. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, April 26-30, 2010, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
20. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
21. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
23. Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A. and Reno, R.R. 1991. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. In M. P. Zanna (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24. Academic Press, New York, pp. 201- 234.
24. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
25. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. 2008. Towards deeper understanding of persuasion in software and information systems. In proceedings of The First International Conference on Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (ACHI 2008), pp. 200-205.
26. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. 2009. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 28.
27. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2010. Requirements for Measuring the Success of Persuasive Technology Applications. MB '10, In proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, August 24-27, 2010, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
28. Lehto, T. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2010. Persuasive features in six weight loss websites: A qualitative evaluation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Persuasive 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 7-10, 2010.
29. Räisänen, T., Lehto, T. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2010. Practical findings from applying the PSD Model for evaluating software design specifications. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Persuasive 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 7-10, 2010.
30. Agarwal, R., Gupta, A. K. and Kraut, R. 2008. Editorial Overview - The Interplay Between Digital and Social Networks. Information Systems Research, 19(3), pp. 243- 252.
31. Steiny, D. F. 2009. Networks and Persuasive Messages. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 24, Article 27, pp. 473-484.
32. Young, M. M. 2010. Twitter Me: Using Micro-blogging to Motivate Teenagers to Exercise. Scientific American 6105, pp. 439-448.
33. Ahmad, R., Komlodi, A., Wang, J. and Hercegfi, K. 2010. The impact of user experience levels on web credibility judgments. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS\&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47 (ASIS\&T '10), Vol. 47. American Society for Information Science, Silver Springs, MD, USA, Article 6.
34. Bandura, A. 2001. Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media Psychology, Volume 3, Issue 3 August 2001, pp. 265-299.
35. Zajonc, R. B. 1965. Social Facilitation. Science, Vol. 149, No. 3681, pp. 269-274.
36. Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 248-287.
37. Malone, T.W. and Lepper, M. 1987. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R.E. Snow and M.J. Farr (eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 223-253.