Rapid effective trace-back capability value: A case study of foot-and-mouth in the Texas High Plains

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 110, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages 323-328

  Hagerman, Amy D ^a   Ward, Michael P ^b   Anderson, David P ^c   Looney, Chris J ^c   McCarl, Bruce A ^c  

^a ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economics; Foot and mouth disease; Market chain; Spread model; Traceability; Veterinary epidemiology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIC; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; TIME; UNITED STATES; VIROLOGY;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TEXAS; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84877713623     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Response Plan: The Red Book 2010, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services, Washington, D.C.
2. Bailey D.V., Slade J Factors influencing support for a national animal identification system for cattle in the United States. Selected paper at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings 2004.
3. Blasi D.A., Dhuyvetter K.C., Spire M.F., Epp M.P., Barnhardt BB A Guide for Electronic Identification of Cattle 2003, Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
4. Cowled B.D., Garner M.G., Negus K., Ward M.P. Controlling disease outbreaks in wildlife using limited culling: modelling classical swine fever incursions in wild pigs in Australia. Vet. Res. 2012, 43(3):16.
5. Elbakidze L. Economic Benefits of Animal Tracing in the Cattle Production Sector. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2007, 32(1):169-180.
6. Elbakidze L., Highfield L., Ward M., McCarl B.A., Norby B. Economics analysis of mitigation strategies for FMD Introduction in highly concentrated animal feeding regions. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2009, 31(4):931-950.
7. Garner M.G., Beckett S.D. Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 2005, 83(12):758-766.
8. Loneragan S., Norby B., Dominguez B. Survey of livestock movements and contacts for simulated spread of foot-and-mouth disease in the Texas Panhandle. Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases 2006.
9. Pendell, D.L., Schroeder, T.C. 2007. Value of animal traceability systems in managing a FMD outbreak. Final Report submitted to USDA - Economic Research Service.
10. Pendell, D.L. 2006. Value of animal traceability systems in managing a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Southwest Kansas. Thesis Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University.
11. Pendell D.L., Leatherman J., Schroeder T.C., Alward G.S. The economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak: a regional analysis. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39:19-33.
12. Schroeder T.C., Tonsor G.T. International cattle identification and traceability: competitive implications for the US. Food Policy 2012, 37:31-40.
13. United States Animal Health Association, 2003. United States Animal Identification Plan. National Identification Development Team. Unpublished manuscript.
14. USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 2009. Overview Report of the Benefit-Cost Analysis of the National Animal Identification System. Washington, DC.
15. Ward M.P., Highfield L.D., Vongseng P., Garner MG Simulation of foot-and-mouth disease spread within an integrated livestock system in Texas, USA. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 88:286-297.