Large-scale wind deployment, social acceptance

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 194-205

  Horbaty, Robert ^a   Huber, Stefanie ^b   Ellis, Geraint ^c  

^a not available   (Switzerland)

^b ENCO AG   (Switzerland)

^c QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; WAGES;

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT; IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; STANDARD OF LIVING; WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; WIND ENERGY PROJECTS; WIND POWER PROJECTS;

WIND POWER;

EID: 84877694315     PISSN: 20418396     EISSN: 2041840X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wene.9     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. European Wind Energy Association. Wind Energy-the Facts: A Guide to the Technology, Economics and Future of Wind Power. London: Sterling; 2009. Available at: http://windfacts.eu. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
2. IEA Wind. Annual reports. Available at: www.ieawind.org. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
3. Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation-an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2683-2691. Available at: http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/Rolf_Wuestenhagen/40501. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
4. Pasqualetti M (ed). Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World. Sustainable World Series. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2002, 248.
5. Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P. The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod. Coast. Management 2005, 33:119-149.
6. Jacobson MZ. Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2009, 2:148-173.
7. Firestone J, Kempton W, Krueger A. Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA. Wind Energy 2009, 12:183-202.
8. Devine-Wright P. Reconsidering public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. Chapter for inclusion In: Jamasb T, Grubb M, Pollitt M, eds. Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy 2010 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/Reconsidering_public_acceptance.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
9. Möller B. Spatial analyses of emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:233-241.
10. Firestone J, Kempton W, Lilley MW, Samoteskul K. Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time. J Environ Policy Plan (Under review).
11. Haggett CO. Understanding public responses to offshore wind power. Energy Policy 2010, 39:503-510.
12. Ladenburg J. Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy. Renew Energy 2008, 33:111-118.
13. Huber S, Horbaty R (ed). State-of-the-art report on social acceptance of wind energy of IEA Wind Task 28 and relating country reports. 2010. Available at: www.socialacceptance.ch. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
14. Ellis G, Barry J, Robinson C. Many ways to say no, different ways to say yes: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. J Environ Plan Manag 2007, 50:517-551.
15. Aitken M. Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1834-1841.
16. Jegen M. Social acceptance of wind energy projects in Québec. Tech Rep 41. Department of Political Science, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada; 2008.
17. Gross C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice andcommunity fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 2009, 35:2727-2736.
18. Feurtey E et al. (ed.). Energie éolienne et acceptabilité sociale: Guide à l'intention des élus municipaux du Québec, 2008, 164. Available at: http://www.uqar.uquebec.ca/crdt/fr/frames.html (Accessed December 14, 2011).
19. Wester-Herber M. Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts-the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environ Sci Policy 2004, 7:109-116.
20. Schöbel S, Lösse J, Schneegans J, Ziegler S (ed). windKULTUREN: Windenergie und Kulturlandschaft. München, Germany: TU München; 2008, 107.
21. van Beek P, Vermaas Ch, Rietveld F. View Windturbines in the Dutch landscape. Resarch on the placing of the newest generation of windturbines in the Dutch landscape, 2006. Available at: http://www.paulvanbeek.nl/engels/windenergieplan-thenetherlands-english.html. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
22. Dimitropoulos A, Kontoleon A. Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of windfarm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1842-1854.
23. Centre for Environmental Design of Renewable Energy. Pre- and post-construction studies of conflicts between birds and wind turbines in coastal Norway. Available at: http://www.cedren.no/Projects/BirdWind.aspx. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
24. Rodrigues L, Bach L, Dubourg-Savage MJ, Goodwin J, Harbusch C. Guideline for Consideration of Bats in Wind Farm Projects. Series No. 3. EUROBATS Publication, Bonn, Germany, 2008, 27. Available at: http://www.eurobats.org/publications/publication%20series/pubseries_no3_english.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
25. U.S. Fish 8 Wildlife Service. Draft Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, 2011, 106. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_omb.pdf (Accessed December 14, 2011).
26. RenewableUK. The economic value of wind to Wales: a survey; 2010, 54. Available at: http://www.bwea.com/pdf/publications/Wales_economic_report2010.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
27. Sustainable Energy Ireland. Attitudes towards the development of wind farms in Ireland, 2003, 54. Available at: http://www.sei.ie/uploadedfiles/RenewableEnergy/Attitudestowardswind.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
28. Munday M, Bristow G, Cowell R. Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? J Rural Stud 2011, 27: 1-12.
29. Lilley M B, Firestone J, Kempton W. The effect of wind power installations on coastal tourism. Energies 2010, 3, 1-22. Available at: http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/3/1/1/. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
30. Hoen B, Wiser R, Cappers P, Thayer M, Sethi G. The impact of wind power projects on residential property values in the United States: a multi-site hedonic analysis, 2009, 164. Available at: http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl-2829e.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
31. Toke D, Breukers S, Wolsink M. Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences?" Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008, 12: 1129-1147.
32. PROGRESS: PROmotion and Growth of Renewable Energe Sources and Systems, Rogier Coenraads, Gemma Reece, Monique Voogt-Ecofys, the Netherlands; 2008, 121. http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-815781.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
33. Schlegel S, Bausch C. Akzeptanz und Strategien für den Ausbau Erneuerbarer Energien auf kommunaler und regionaler Ebene: Endbericht zum Teilprojekt B-Akzeptanzuntersuchung Erneuerbare Energien auf regionaler Ebene. Verbundforschungsprojekt, Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung gGmbH, Ecologic, Kommunalwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Potsdam, Institut für Ressourcenschonung. In: Innovation und Sustainability. Berlin; 2007. Available at: http://ecologic.eu/download/projekte/950-999/991/verbundprojekt_izt_endbericht-teilprojekt_zw_akzeptanz_ecologic.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
34. Canadian Wind Energy Association. Wind energy development: best practices for community engagement and public consultation, 2011, 40. Available at: http://www.canwea.ca/pdf/canwea-communityengagement-report-e-final-web.pdf. (Accessed December, 2011).
35. British Wind Energy Association. Best practice guidelines: consultation for offshore wind energy developments, 2002, 32. Available at: http://www.bwea.com/pdf/bwea-bpg-offshore.pdf. (Accessed December, 2011).
36. Thor SE. IEA Topical Expert Meeting #42. Acceptability in implementation of wind turbines in social landscapes, 2004, 148. Available at: http://www.ieawind.org/Task_11/Proceedings/42_Acceptance.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
37. Renewable Energy Partnership. To catch the wind: The potential for Community Ownership of Wind Farms in Ireland, 2004, 52. Available at: http://www.feasta.org/documents/energy/ToCatchTheWind.htm. (Accessed December 24, 2011).
38. Community Energy Scotland Limited. Community Renewable Energy Toolkit, 2009, 110. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/03/20155542/0. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
39. Maruyama Y. The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation. Energy Policy 2007, 35: 2761-2769.
40. Haggett C, Vigar G. "Tilting at windmills?" Town and Country Planning, 2004. Available at: http://www.psi.org.uk/ehb/projectsbenson.html. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
41. BBC Research 8 Consulting. Wind Power Facility Siting Case Studies: Community Response, 2005, 51. Available at: http://www.bbcresearch.com/reports/Wind%20Power%20Facility%20Siting%20Case%20Studies.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
42. Szarka J. Wind power in Europe: Politics, Business and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007, 248.
43. Department of Communities and Local Government. Take up and application of the policies in the planning policy statement on planning and climate change: final report, 2010, 196. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/takeupresearch. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
44. Vindmøllesekretariatet. Available at: www.vind.mim.dk. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
45. Sustainable Energy Authority Ireland. Good Practice Wind Energy Planning Workshops. Available at: http://www.seai.ie/Renewables/Wind_Energy/Regional_Wind_Workshops/. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
46. Neddermann B (ed.). Repowering von Windenergiean-lagen-Kommunale Handlungsmöglichkeiten. 2009, 108. Available at: http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/leitfaden_repowering.pdf. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
47. Ellis G, Cowell R, Warren CH, Strachan P, Szarka J, Hadwin R, Miner P, Wolsink M, Nadai A. Planning Theory 8 Practice 2010, 10(4): 521-547.
48. Barry J, Ellis G, Robinson C. Cool rationalities and hot air: a rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environ Politics 2008, 8:67-98.
49. Energy research Centre of the Netherlands. Cultural influences on renewable energy acceptance and tools for the development of communication strategies to promote ACCEPTANCE among key actor groups, 2008. Available at: www.createacceptance.net. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
50. International Energy Agency. Implementing Agreement for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment ('RENBAR'). Available at: http://www.iea-retd.org/. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
51. Good Practice Wind. Supported by Intelligent Energy Europe. Available at: http://www.project-gpwind.eu/. (Accessed December 14, 2011).
52. On www.socialacceptance.ch, the state-of-the-art report of IEA Wind Task 28 is available for download together with nine national state-of-the-art reports from the participating countries. The state-of-the-art report and the online Web database include a more detailed description of the issues mentioned in this article, further findings of the working group, as well as literature and project references from over 15 countries in several languages.