Hyperspectral and panchromatic image fusion using unmixing-based constrained nonnegative matrix factorization

Optik

Volumn 124, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 1601-1608

  Zhang, Zhou ^a   Shi, Zhenwei ^a   An, Zhenyu ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Constrained nonnegative matrix factorization (CNMF); Hyperspectral image fusion; Projected gradient algorithm; Spectra unmixing

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINED OPTIMI-ZATION PROBLEMS; HIGH SPECTRAL RESOLUTION; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGES; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE FUSIONS; IMAGE FUSION TECHNIQUES; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; PROJECTED GRADIENT; UNMIXING;

CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; IMAGE FUSION; SPECTROSCOPY;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 84877693820     PISSN: 00304026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J.B. Adams, M.O. Smith, and A.R. Gillespie Imaging spectroscopy: interpretation based on spectral mixture images Remote Geochem. Anal. Elem. Miner. Compos. 7 27 1993 145 166
2. B. Aiazzi, L. Alparone, S. Baronti, and A. Garzelli Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multi-resolution analysis IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40 10 2002 2300 2312
3. J.W. Boardman Geometric mixture analysis of imaging spectrometry data IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 4 1994 2369 2371
4. M. Cetin, and N. Musaolu Merging hyperspectral and panchromatic image data: qualitative and quantitative analysis Int. J. Remote Sens. 30 7 2009 1779 1804
5. A. Cichocki, and R. Zdunek Multilayer nonnegative matrix factorization using projected gradient approaches Int. J. Neural Syst. 17 6 2007 431 446
6. C.I. Chang An information theoretic-based approach to spectral variability, similarity and discriminability for hyperspectral image analysis IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46 5 2000 1927 1932
7. P.S. Chavez, S.C. Slides, and J.A. Anderson Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic Photogr. Eng. Remote Sens. 57 3 1991 295 303
8. Y. Chen, Z. Xue, and R.S. Blum Theoretical analysis of an information-based quality measure for image fusion Inf. Fus. 2 2008 161 175
9. China Centre for Resources Satellite Data and Application, http://www.cresda.com.
10. M. Deshmukh, and U. Bhosale Image fusion and image quality assessment of fused images Int. J. Image Process. 4 5 2010 484 508
11. M.C. El-Mezouar, N. Taleb, K. Kpalma, and J. Ronsin An IHS-based fusion for color distortion reduction and vegetation enhancement in IKONOS imagery IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49 5 2011 1590 1602
12. Google Map, http://ditu.google.cn/maps.
13. G. Healey, and D. Slater Models and methods for automated material identification in hyperspectral imagery acquired under unknown illumination and atmospheric conditions IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37 6 1999 2706 2717
14. P.O. Hoyer Non-negative sparse coding IEEE Workshop Neural Netw. Signal Process. 2002 557 565
15. S. Jia, and Y. Qian Constrained nonnegative matrix factorization for hyperspectral unmixing IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 1 2009 161 173
16. N. Keshava A survey of spectral unmixing algorithms Lincoln Lab. J. 14 1 2003 55 78
17. D.D. Lee, and H.S. Seung Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization Nature 401 1999 788 791
18. C.J. Lin Projected gradient methods for non-negative matrix factorization Neural Comput. 19 10 2007 2756 2779
19. D. Manolakis, D. Marden, and G.A. Shaw Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications Lincoln Lab. J. 14 1 2003 79 116
20. J.M.P. Nascimento, and J.M.B. Dias Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 4 2005 898 910
21. A. Pellemans, R. Jordans, and R. Allewijn Merging multispectral and panchromatic SPOT images with respect to the radiometric properties of the sensor Photogr. Eng. Remote Sens. 59 1 1993 81 87
22. W. Roberts, J.V. Aardt, and F. Ahmed Assessment of image fusion procedures using entropy, image quality, and multispectral J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2 2008 023522
23. J.W. Roberts, J. Van Aardt, and F. Ahmed Assessment of image fusion procedures using entropy, image quality, and multispectral classification J. Appl. Remote Sens. 1 2008 023522
24. G.A. Shaw, and H.K. Burke Spectral imaging for remote sensing Lincoln Lab. J. 14 1 2003 3 28
25. E.M. Schetselaar Fusion by the IHS transform: should we use cylindrical or spherical coordinates Int. J. Remote Sens. 19 4 1998 759 765
26. H.Z.M. Shafri, A. Suhaili, and S. Manso The performance of Maximum likelihood spectral angle mapper neural network and decision tree classifiers in hyperspectral image analysis J. Comput. Sci. 3 6 2007 419 423
27. US Army Corps Engineers, http://www.tec.army.mil/hypercube/.
28. V. Vijayaraj, C.G.O. Hara, and N.H. Younan Quality analysis of pansharpened images Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 2004 85 88
29. R. Zdunek, and A. Cichocki Fast nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms using projected gradient approaches for large-scale problems Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2008 1 13
30. Y. Zhang, and G. Hong An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images Inf. Fus. 6 2005 225 234
31. B. Zhukov, D. Oertel, F. Lanzl, and G. Reinhäckel Unmixing-based multisensor multiresolution image fusion IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37 3 1999 1212 1226