What's in the black box of arthritis rehabilitation? A comparison of rehabilitation practice for patients with inflamatory arthritis in Northern Europe

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 458-466

  Grotle, Margreth ^a,b   Klokkerud, Mari ^a   Kjeken, Ingvild ^a,c   Bremander, Ann ^d,e,f   Hagel, Sofia ^f   Strömbeck, Britta ^f,g   Hørslev Petersen, Kim ^h   Meesters, Jorit ⁱ   Vlieland, Thea P M Vliet ⁱ   Hagen, Kåre B ^a,c  

^a DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d HALMSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e Research and Development Centre   (Sweden)

^f LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^g MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h King Christian the Xth Hospital   (Denmark)

ⁱ LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arthritis; Context; Outcome; Process; Structure; Team rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; SPONDYLARTHROPATHIES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPONDYLARTHROPATHIES;

EID: 84877682073     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1125     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Li LC, Maetzel A, Pencharz JN, Maguire L, Bombardier C. Use of mainstream nonpharmacologic treatment by patients with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 5: 203-209.
2. Petersson IF. Evolution of team care and evaluation of effectiveness. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005; 17: 160-163.
3. Vlieland TP, de Buck PD, van den Hout WB, Vlieland TPMV, de Buck PDM, van den Hout WB. Vocational rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009; 21: 183-188.
4. Vliet Vlieland TP, Li LC, MacKay C, Badley EM. Does everybody need a team? J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1897-1899.
5. Glasziou PP, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatments in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008; 336: 1472-1474.
6. Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, Clarke M, Eccles MP, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000086.
7. Fried BJ, Boers M, Baker PR. A method for achieving consensus on rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures: the OMERACT conference process. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 548-551.
8. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 637-639.
9. Schulz KF. The quest for unbiased research: randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines. Ann Neurol 2007; 41: 569-573.
10. Des J, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 361-366.
11. O'Donnell S, Li LC, King J, Lauzon C, Finn H, Vliet Vlieland TP. Development of a framework for reporting health service models for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 151-165.
12. Khanna D, Arnold EL, Pencharz JN, Grossman JM, Traina SB, Lal A, MacLean CH. Measuring process of arthritis care: the Arthritis Foundation's quality indicator set for rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2006; 35: 211-237.
13. Klokkerud M, Hagen KB, Kjeken I, Bremander A, Hørslev-Petersen K, Vlieland TV, et al. Development of a framework identifying domains and elements of importance for arthritis rehabilitation. J Rehab Med 2012; 44: 406-413.
14. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA Jr, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1346-1353.
15. Grotle M, Garratt AM, Klokkerud M, Lochting I, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. What's in team rehabilitation care after arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? Results from a multicenter, longitudinal study assessing structure, process, and outcome. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 121-131.
16. World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: ICF; 2001.
17. Zeidler J, Mittendorf T, Vahldiek G, Zeidler H, Merkesdal S. Comparative cost analysis of outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation for musculoskeletal diseases in Germany. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 1527-1534.
18. Hurkmans E, van der Giesen FJ, Vliet Vlieland TP, Schoones J, van den Ende EC. Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 7: CD006853.
19. Dagfinrud H, Kvien TK, Hagen KB. Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 23: CD002822.
20. Christie A, Jamtvedt G, Dahm KT, Moe RH, Haavardsholm EA, Hagen KB. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of systematic reviews. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 1697-1715.