Validating the positive impact of in-hospital lay care-partner support on patient survival in allogeneic BMT: A prospective study

Bone Marrow Transplantation

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 671-677

  Foster, L W ^a   McLellan, L ^b   Rybicki, L ^c   Dabney, J ^b   Copelan, E ^b   Bolwell, B ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TAUSSIG CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

allogeneic BMT; lay care partner support; patient survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALLOGENIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER SUPPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH VISITOR; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SURVIVAL RATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877656487     PISSN: 02683369     EISSN: 14765365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.208     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Foster LW, McLellan LJ, Rybicki LA, Sassano DA, Hsu A, Bolwell BJ. Survival of patients who have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the relative importance of in-hospital lay care-partner support. J Psychosoc Oncol 2004; 22: 1-20.
2. Baum A, Posluszny DM. Traumatic stress as a target for intervention with cancer patients. In: Baum A, Andersen BL (eds). Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer. American Psychological Association: Washington DC, 2001, pp 143-173.
3. Gurevich M, Devins GM, Rodin GM. Stress response syndromes and cancer: Conceptual and assessment issues. Psychosomatics 2002; 43: 259-281.
4. Jim HSL, Jacobsen PB. Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth in cancer survivorship: A review. Cancer J 2008; 14: 414-419.
5. Bolund C. Crisis and coping-learning to live with cancer. In: Holland JC, Zittoun R (eds). Psychosocial Aspects of Oncology. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1990, pp 13-26.
6. Henoch I, Danielson E. Existential concerns among patients with cancer and interventions to meet them: an integrative literature review. Psycho-Oncol 2009; 18: 225-236.
7. Lai H, Lai S, Krongrad A, Trapido E, Page JB, McCoy CB. The effect of marital status on survival in late stage cancer patients: an analysis based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data, in the United States. Int J Behav Med 1999; 6: 150-176.
8. Kravdal O. The impact of marital status on cancer survival. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 357-368.
9. Goodwin JS, Hunt WC, Key CR, Samet JM. The effect of marital status on stage, treatment, and survival of cancer patients. JAMA 1987; 258: 3125-3130.
10. Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 789-797.
11. Weihs KL, Enright TM, Simmens SJ. Close relationships and emotional processing predict decreased mortality in women with breast cancer: Preliminary evidence. Psychosom Med 2008; 70: 117-124.
12. Reynolds P, Hurley S, Torres M, Jackson J, Boyd P, Chen VW. Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: results from the black/white cancer survival study. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 940-949.
13. Harris JC, DeAngelis CD. The power of hope. JAMA 2008; 300: 2919-2920.
14. Beauregard M. Mind does really matter: evidence from neuroimaging studies of emotional self-regulation, psychotherapy, and placebo effect. Prog Neurobiol 2007; 81: 218-236.
15. Colloca L, Benedetti F. Placebos and painkillers: is mind as real as matter? Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 545-552.
16. Haour F. Mechanisms of the placebo effect and of conditioning. Neuroimmunomodulation 2005; 12: 195-200.
17. Carter CS, Carter CS, Grippo AJ, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Ruscio MG, Porges SW. Oxytocin, vasopressin and sociality. Prog Brain Res 2008; 170: 331-336.
18. Coyne JC, DeLongis A. Going beyond social support: the role of social relationships in adaptation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54: 454-460.
19. Olbrisch ME, Levenson JL, Hamer R. The PACT: a rating scale for the study of clinical decision making in psychosocial screening of organ transplant candidates. Clin Transplant 1989; 3: 164-169.
20. Frick E, Ramm G, Bumeder I, Schulz-Kindermann F, Tyroller M, Fischer N. Social support and quality of life of patients prior to stem cell or bone marrow Transplantation. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11: 451-462.
21. Frick E, Motzke C, Fischer N, Busch R, Bumeder I. Is perceived social support a predictor of survival for patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation? Psycho-Oncol 2005; 14: 759-770.
22. Galvin K, Todres L, Richardson M. The intimate mediator: a carer's experience of Alzheimer's. Scand J Caring Sciences 2005; 19: 2-11.
23. Justice B. Being well inside the self: a different measure of health. Adv Mind Body Med 1998; 14: 43-73.
24. Idler EL, Angel RJ. Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES-1 epidemiologic follow-up study. Am J Public Health 1990; 80: 446-452.
25. Idler EL, Kasl S. Health perceptions and survival: Do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? J Gerontol 1991; 46: S55.
26. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a metaanalytic review. Plos Med 2010; 7: 1-20.
27. Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, Henslee-Downey PJ. Psychosocial factors predictive of survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. Psychosomatic 1994; 56: 432-439.
28. Colon EA, Callies A, Popkin M, McGlave P. Depressed mood and other variables related to bone marrow transplantation survival in acute leukemia. Psychosomatics 1991; 32: 420-425.
29. Rodrigue JR, Pearman TP, Moreb J. Morbidity and mortality following bone marrow transplantation: Predictive utility of pre-BMT affective functioning, compliance, and social support stability. Int J Behav Med 1999; 6: 241-254.
30. Leigh S, Wilson KCM, Burns R, Clark RE. Psychosocial morbidity in bone marrow transplant recipients: a prospective study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 16: 635-640.
31. Foster LW, McLellan L, Rybicki L, Dabney J, Visnosky M, Bolwell B. Utility of the psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT) scale in allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 375-380.