Apparent resolution enhancement for animations

Proceedings - SCCG 2011: 27th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 57-64

  Templin, Krzysztof ^a,b   Didyk, Piotr ^b   Ritschel, Tobias ^c   Eisemann, Elmar ^c   Myszkowski, Karol ^b   Seidel, Hans Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WROC AW   (Poland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^c TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

eye tracking; image reconstruction; perception

Indexed keywords

EYE-TRACKING; HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGE; HUMAN PERCEPTION; IMAGE SEQUENCE; LIMITED RESOLUTION; LOW RESOLUTION; LOW RESOLUTION IMAGES; RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT;

DISPLAY DEVICES; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84877627052     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2461217.2461230     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. AKENINE-MÖLLER, T., HAINES, E., AND HOFFMAN, N. 2008. Real-Time Rendering 3rd Edition. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA.
2. ALLEN, W., AND ULICHNEY, R. 2005. Wobulation: Doubling the addressed resolution of projection displays. In Proc. Symp. Digest of Technical Papers (SID), vol. 47.4 of The Society for Information Display, 1514-1517.
3. BASU, S., AND BAUDISCH, P. 2009. System and process for increasing the apparent resolution of a display (US Patent 7548662).
4. BENZSCHAWEL, J. L., AND HOWARD, W. E. 1994. Method of and apparatus for displaying a multicolor image (US Patent 5341153).
5. BIJL, P., SCHUTTE, K., AND HOGERVORST, M. 2006. Applicability of TOD, MTDP, MRT and DMRT for dynamic image enhancement techniques. In Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 6207, SPIE.
6. DAMERA-VENKATA, N., AND CHANG, N. L. 2009. Display supersampling. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 1, 9:1-9:19.
7. DIDYK, P., EISEMANN, E., RITSCHEL, T., MYSZKOWSKI, K., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2010. Apparent display resolution enhancement for moving images. ACM Trans. Graph. 29 (July), 113:1-113:8.
8. HARA, Z., AND SHIRAMATSU, N. 2000. Improvement in the picture quality of moving pictures for matrix displays. J. SID 8, 2, 129-137.
9. HORN, B. K. P., AND SCHUNCK, B. G. 1981. Determining optical flow. Artifical Intelligence 17, 185-203.
10. KALLONIATIS, M., AND LUU, C., 2009. Temporal resolution. http://webvision.med.utah.edu/temporal.html.
11. KLOMPENHOUWER, M. A., AND DE HAAN, G. 2003. Subpixel image scaling for color-matrix displays. J. SID 11, 1, 99-108.
12. KRAPELS, K., DRIGGERS, R. G., AND TEANEY, B. 2005. Target-acquisition performance in undersampled infrared imagers: static imagery to motion video. Applied Optics 44, 33, 7055-7061.
13. MESSING, D. S., AND KEROFSKY, L. J. 2006. Using optimal rendering to visually mask defective subpixels. In Human Vision and Electr. Imaging XI, vol. 6057 of SPIE Proc. Series, SPIE, 236-247.
14. MITCHELL, D. P., AND NETRAVALI, A. N. 1988. Reconstruction filters in computer-graphics. Proc. SIGGRAPH 22, 4, 221-228.
15. PARK, S., PARK, M., AND KANG, M. 2003. Super-resolution image reconstruction: A technical overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 20, 3, 21-36.
16. PLATT, J. 2000. Optimal filtering for patterned displays. Signal Processing Letters, IEEE 7, 7, 179-181.
17. TEKALP, A. 1995. Digital Video Processing. Prentice Hall.
18. TURKOWSKI, K., 1990. Turkowski filters for common resampling tasks.
19. VAN HATEREN, J. H. 2005. A cellular and molecular model of response kinetics and adaptation in primate cones and horizontal cells. J. Vision 5, 4, 331-347.
20. VAN OUWERKERK, J. 2006. Image super-resolution survey. Image and Vision Computing 24, 10, 1039-1052.
21. 1 optical flow. In I. Ann. Symp. German Association Patt. Recogn., German Association Patt. Recogn., 214-223.