Determining optimal conditions to produce activated carbon from barley husks using single or dual optimization

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 125, Issue , 2013, Pages 117-125

  Loredo Cancino, M ^a   Soto Regalado, E ^a   Cerino Cordova F J ^a   Garcia Reyes R B ^a   Garcia Leon A M ^a   Garza Gonzalez M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Barley husks; Central composite design; Iodine number; Optimization; Yield

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WASTES; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; IMPREGNATION; IODINE; OPTIMIZATION; SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA; ZINC CHLORIDE;

ACTIVATION TEMPERATURES; ACTIVATION TIME; BARLEY HUSK; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; DUAL OPTIMIZATIONS; IODINE NUMBER; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OPTIMISATIONS; PROPERTY; YIELD;

ACTIVATED CARBON;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORBENT; IODINE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; ZINC CHLORIDE;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; BARLEY; OPTIMIZATION; PLANT PRODUCT; SURFACE AREA;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BARLEY; BARLEY HUSK; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; FACTORIAL DESIGN; NONHUMAN; POLLUTANT; POROSITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REACTION TIME; SEED HUSK; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY;

EID: 84877358928     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alhamed Y.A. Adsorption kinetics and performance of packed bed adsorber for phenol removal using activated carbon from dates' stones. J.Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170(2-3):763-770.
2. ASTM Standard D3172, 2007a Standard Practice for Proximate Analysis of Coal and Coke 2007, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. ASTM Standard D4607, 1994 Standard Test Method for Determination of Iodine Number of Activated Carbon 2011, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007.
4. Boudrahem F., Soualah A., Aissani-Benissad F. Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions using activated carbon developed from coffee residue activated with phosphoric acid and zinc chloride. J.Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56(5):1946-1955.
5. Cerino-Córdova F.J., García-León A.M., García-Reyes R.B., Garza-González M.T., Soto-Regalado E., Sánchez-González M.N., Quezada-López I. Response surface methodology for lead biosorption on Aspergillus terreus. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 8(4):695-704.
6. COFUPRO Identificación de las Demandas Tecnológicas de la Cadena Agroalimentaria de Cebada 2002, Coordinación Nacional de las Fundaciones Produce, A. C.
7. Cooney D.O. Adsorption Design for Wastewater Treatment 1998, Lewis Publishers, Florida.
8. Demiral H., Gündüzoǧlu G. Removal of nitrate from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from sugar beet bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(6):1675-1680.
9. Efremenko I., Sheintuch M. Predicting solute adsorption on activated carbon: phenol. Langmuir 2006, 22:3614-3621.
10. Guijarro-Aldaco A., Hernández-Montoya V., Bonilla-Petriciolet A., Montes-Morán M.A., Mendoza-Castillo D.I. Improving the adsorption of heavy metals from water using commercial carbons modified with egg shell wastes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50(15):9354-9362.
11. Hernández-Montoya V., Ramírez-Montoya L.A., Bonilla-Petriciolet A., Montes-Morán M.A. Optimizing the removal of fluoride from water using new carbons obtained by modification of nut shell with a calcium solution from egg shell. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012, 61(1):1-7.
12. Khenniche L., Benissad-Aissani F. Adsorptive removal of phenol by coffee residue activated carbon and commercial activated carbon: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. J.Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55(11):4677-4686.
13. Kim K.J., Lin D.K.J. Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions. Appl. Statist. 2000, 49(3):311-325.
14. Krawczyk H., Persson T., Andersson A., Jonsson A.-S. Isolation of hemicelluloses from barley husks. Food Bioprod. Process. 2008, 86(1):31-36.
15. Leyva Ramos R. Importancia y Aplicaciones de la Adsorción en Fase Líquida. Sólidos porosos. Preparación, caracterización y aplicaciones 2007, 155-211. Bogotá, Colombia. Ediciones Uniandes. J.C.M. Piraján (Ed.).
16. Lua A.C., Yang T. Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from pistachio-nut shell by zinc chloride activation under nitrogen and vacuum conditions. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 290(2):505-513.
17. Mohanty K., Das D., Biswas M. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Sterculia alata nutshell by chemical activation with zinc chloride to remove phenol from wastewater. Adsorption 2006, 12(2):119-132.
18. Mohanty K., Jha M., Meikap B.C., Biswas M.N. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from terminalia arjuna nut with zinc chloride activation for the removal of phenol from wastewater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44(11):4128-4138.
19. Montgomery D.C. Diseño y Análisis de Experimentos 2010, Limusa Wiley, México. second ed.
20. 2 activated coir pith carbon. J.Hazard. Mater. B 2006, 135:449-452.
21. Nieto-Delgado C., Rangel-Mendez J.R. Production of activated carbon from organic by-products from the alcoholic beverage industry: surface area and hardness optimization by using the response surface methodology. Ind. Crop Prod. 2011, 34(3):1528-1537.
22. Noh J.S., Schwarz J.A. Estimation of the point of zero charge of simple oxides by mass titration. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 1989, 130(1):157-164.
23. Palmarola-Adrados B., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Pretreatment of barley husks for bioethanol production. J.Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80:85-91.
24. Sahu J.N., Acharya J., Meikap B.C. Optimization of production conditions for activated carbons from tamarind wood by zinc chloride using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(6):1974-1982.
25. SIAP Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola 2012, Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera.
26. Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W., Moscou L., Pierotti R.A., Rouquerol J., Siemieniewska T. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57(4):603-619.
27. Snoeyink V.L., Weber W.J. The surface chemistry of active carbon: a discussion of structure and surface functional groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1967, 1(3):228-234.
28. StatEase, Inc Design Expert 7 User's Guide, Minneapolis 2005.
29. Temdrara L., Khelifi A., Addoun A., Spahis N. Study of the adsorption properties of lignocellulosic material activated chemically by gas adsorption and immersion calorimetry. Desalination 2008, 223(1-3):274-282.
30. Timur S., Ikizoglu E., Yanik J. Preparation of activated carbons from Oreganum stalks by chemical activation. Energy Fuels 2006, 20(6):2636-2641.
31. Timur S., Kantarli I.C., Onenc S., Yanik J. Characterization and application of activated carbon produced from oak cups pulp. J.Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2010, 89(1):129-136.
32. 2 chemical activation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50(7):4057-4064.
33. Yang R.T. Adsorbents: Fundamentals and Applications 2003, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
34. Yang T., Lua A.C. Textural and chemical properties of zinc chloride activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2006, 100(2-3):438-444.