Has designating and protecting critical habitat had an impact on endangered North Atlantic right whale ship strike mortality?

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 293-304

  Mullen, Kaitlyn A ^a,b   Peterson, Michael L ^a   Todd, Sean K ^b  

^a The University of Maine   (United States)

^b Policy and Design   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical habitat; Eubalaena glacialis; Habitat fragmentation; North Atlantic right whale; Ship strike

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; GROWTH RATE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MIGRATION; RECOVERY PLAN; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; WHALE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; ATLANTIC OCEAN (NORTH);

EID: 84877346661     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Endangered Species Act, 1973; amended 2002, p. 219-65, United States.
2. Suckling K., Taylor M. Critical habitat and recovery in The Endangered Species Act at thirty 2006, vol. 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 75-89.
3. Czech B., Krausman P.R. The Endangered Species Act: history, conservation biology, and public policy 2001, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
4. Scott J.M., Goble D.D., Davis F.W. Introduction in The Endangered Species Act at thirty 2006, vol. 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 3-15.
5. Abbitt R.J., Scott J.M. Examining differences between recovered and declining endangered species. Conservation Biology 2001, 15(5):1274-1284.
6. Hildreth R. Place-based ocean management: emerging US law and practice. Ocean & Coastal Management 2008, 51:659-670.
7. Reeves RR, Read AJ, Lowry L, Katona SK, Boness DJ. Report of the North Atlantic right whale program review. Marine Mammal Commission 2007, 13-17 March 2006: Woods Hole, Massachusetts; 69 p.
8. Wallace R.L. Social influences on conservation: lessons from US recovery programs for marine mammals. Conservation Biology 2003, 17(1):104-155.
9. Scott J.M., Goble D.D., Svancara L.K., Pidgorna A. By the numbers in The Endangered Species Act at thirty 2006, vol. 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 16-35.
10. Bearzi M. Cetaceans and MPAs should go hand in hand: a case study in Santa Monica Bay, California. Ocean & Coastal Management 2012, 60:56-59.
11. Elvin S.S., Taggart C.T. Right whales and vessels in Canadian waters. Marine Policy 2008, 32:379-386.
12. Hinch P.R., De Santo E.M. Factors to consider in evaluating the management and conservation effectiveness of a whale sanctuary to protect and conserve the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Marine Policy 2011, 35:163-180.
13. National Marine Fisheries Service. North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum; 2012: 34 p. Available from NOAA Fisheries Service, Northeast Regional Office, Gloucester, Massachusetts.
14. Kraus S.D., Rolland R.M. Right whales in the urban ocean in The Urban whale 2007, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, P. 1-38. S.D. Kraus, R.M. Rolland (Eds.).
15. National Marine Fisheries Service. Recovery plan for the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland; 2005: 137 p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, 1315 East-West Highway, 13th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
16. Asaro M.J. Geospatial analysis of management areas implemented for protection of the North Atlantic right whale along the northern Atlantic coast of the United States. Marine Policy 2012, 36:915-921.
17. Moore M.J., McLellan W.A., Daoust P.Y., Bonde R.K., Knowlton A.R. Right whale mortality: a message from the dead to the living noise in The Urban whale 2007, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, P. 358-79. S.D. Kraus, R.M. Rolland (Eds.).
18. Van Der Hoop J.M., Moore M.J., Barco S.G., Cole T.V.N., Daoust P.Y., Henry A.G., et al. Assessment of management to mitigate anthropogenic effects on large whales. Conservation Biology 27 (1), 2012, 1-13. 10.111/j.1523-1729.2012.01934.x.
19. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, with Schedule of Whaling Regulations. 2 December 1946, 62 Stat. 1716, 161 UNTS 72.
20. Marine Mammal Protection Act, 1972; amended 2004 and 2007, United States, 113 p.
21. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Designated Critical Habitat; Northern Right whale. 6/3/1994; 30p. 59 FR 28793. Available from: 30 p. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/fr/fr59-28805.pdf.
22. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. North Atlantic right whale stock assessment report. Marine mammal stock assessment reports 2011. National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland; 11 p. Available from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/protres/PR2/StockAssessmentProgram/sars.html.
23. Caswell H., Brault S., Fujiwara M. Declining survival probability threatens the North Atlantic right whale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 1999, 96:3308-3313.
24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. North Atlantic right whale stock assessment report. Marine mammal stock assessment reports 1995; National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland; 5 p. Available from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/protres/PR2/StockAssessmentProgram/sars.html.
25. National Marine Fisheries Service. Review of the status of North Atlantic right whales in the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum; 2006: 68p. Available from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/statusreviews/rightwhale2006.pdf.
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered fish and wildlife; Final Rule to implement speed restrictions to reduce the threat of ship collisions with North Atlantic right whales. Federal Register 10/10/2008; 73 FR 198: p. 60173-91.
27. National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. Reducing Ship Strike to North Atlantic Right whales. Office of Protected Resources. Available from: [updated 03.01.13; accessed 08.01.13]. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/shipstrike/.
28. Trotter B. CAT ferry operator drops lease for MDI terminal. Bangor Daily News, March 19,2011. Available from: [accessed 19.01.13]. http://bangordailynews.com/2011/03/19/business/cat-ferry-operator-drops-lease-for-mdi-terminal/.
29. Bettridge S, Silber GK. Update on the United States action to reduce the threat of ship collisions with large whales. In: Proceedings of the international whaling commission 61st annual meeting, Maderia, Portugal, June 2009. IWC/61/CC14; Agenda Item 4: 4p.
30. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Regulations governing the approach to North Atlantic right whales. 11/30/2004; 69 FR 229: p. 69536-37.
31. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for North Atlantic Right whale Protection. 1/2000; 65 FR 2: p. 270-72.
32. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Petition to initiate emergency rulemaking to prevent the extinction of the North Atlantic right whale; final determination. Federal Register 09/24/2005; vol. 70 (188): p. 56884-5.
33. National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. Reducing Ship Strike to North Atlantic Right whales. Office of Protected Resources. available from: [updated 01.03.13; accessed 19.01.13]. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/shipstrike/map_sma.pdf.
34. Silber G.K., Vanderlaan A.S.M., Arceredillo A.T., Johnson L., Taggart C.T., Brown M.W., et al. The role of the International Maritime Organization in reducing vessel threat to whales: process, options, action and effectiveness. Marine Policy 2012, 36:1221-1233.
35. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Proposed endangered status for North Atlantic right whales. Federal Register 12/27/2006; vol. 71 (248): p. 77704-16.
36. Committee on Taxonomy. List of marine mammal species and subspecies. Society for Marine Mammalogy 2012. Available from: [accessed 02.01.13]. http://www.marinemammalscience.org.
37. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Finding for a petition to revise critical habitat for Northern right whales. Federal Register 8/28/2003; vol. 68 (167): p. 51758-63.
38. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Revision of critical habitat for the Northern right whale in the Pacific Ocean. Federal Register 7/6/2006; vol. 71 (129): p. 38277-97.
39. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Designating critical habitat for the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Federal Register 10/6/2010; vol. 73 (193): p. 61690-91.
40. Boyd C., Brooks T.M., Butchart S.H.M., Edgar G.J., da Fonseca G.A.B., Hawkins F, et al. Spatial scale and the conservation of threatened species. Conservation Letters 2008, 1:37-43.
41. Harwood J. Marine mammals and their environment in the 21st century. Journal of Mammalogy 2001, 82(3):630-640.
42. Fahrig L. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 2002, 12(2):346-353.
43. Ward-Geiger L.I., Silber G.K., Baumstark R.D., Pulfer T.L. Characterization of ship traffic in right whale critical habitat. Coastal Management 2005, 33:263-278.
44. Silber GK, Bettridge S. Vessel operations in right whale protection areas in 2009. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum 2010; NMFS-OPR-44. 44 p. Additional copies may be obtained at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr.
45. Merrick RL. Seasonal management areas to reduce ship strikes of northern right whales in the Gulf of Maine. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 2005; 05-19: 18p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1026.
46. Nichols OC, Kite-Powell H. Analysis of risk to North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) from shipping traffic in Cape Cod Bay. Final Report. Submitted to NOAA Fisheries Northeast Fisheries Science Center. NOAA Award no. Na03NMF4720489; February 2005: 20 p.
47. Bettridge S, Silber GK. Update on the United States action to reduce the threat of ship collisions with large whales. Prepared for the International Whaling Commission's working group on ship strikes and presented at the International Whaling Commission's Conservation Committee 2008; Santiago, Chile, June 16, 2008; IWC/60/6612: 11 p.
48. Pace R. Frequency of whale and vessel collisions on the US eastern seaboard: ten years prior and two years post ship strike rule. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 2001; 11-15: 12 p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1026.
49. Henry AG, Cole TVN, Garron M, Hall, L. Mortality and serious injury determinations for baleen whale stocks along the Gulf of Mexico, United States and Canadian eastern seaboards, 2005-2009. US Department of Commerce, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 2011; 11-18: 24 p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1026.
50. Nelson M, Garron M, Merrick RL, Pace RM III, Cole TVN. Mortality and serious injury determinations for baleen whale stocks along the United States eastern seaboard and adjacent Canadian maritimes, 2001-2005. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 2007; 07-05: 18 p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1026.
51. Jensen AS, Silber GK. Large Whale Shipstrike Database. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum 2003; NMFS-OPR, 37 p. Additional copies may be obtained from: National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, 1315 East-West Highway, 13th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
52. Andrén H. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 1994, 71(3):355-366.
53. Schick R.S., Halpin P.N., Read A.J., Slay C.K., Kraus S.D., Mate B.R., et al. Striking the right balance in right whale conservation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2009, 66:1399-1403.
54. Firestone J. Policy consideration and measures to reduce the likelihood of vessel collisions with great whales. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 2009, 36:389-400.
55. Firestone J., Lyons S.B., Wang C., Corbett J.J. Statistical modeling of North Atlantic right whale migration along the mid-Atlantic region of the eastern seaboard of the United States. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:221-232.
56. Knowlton A, Ring J, Russell B. Right whale sightings and survey effort in the mid-Atlantic region: migratory corridor, time frame, and proximity to port entrances. A report submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service Ship Strike Working Group 2002. Available from: http://www.nero.noaa.gov/shipstrike/ssr/midatlanticreportrFINAL.pdf.
57. Kenney R.D., Mayo C.A., Winn H.E. Migration and foraging strategies at varying spatial scales in western North Atlantic right whales: a review of hypotheses. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 2001, 2:251-260. Special Issue.
58. Mate B.R., Nieukirk S.L., Kraus S.D. Satellite-monitored movements of the northern right whale. Journal of Wildlife Management 1997, 61(4):1393-1405.
59. Glass AH, Cole TVN, Garron M. Mortality and serious injury determinations for baleen whale stocks along the United States and Canadian eastern seaboards, 2004-2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum 2010; NMFS-NE-214: 19 p. Available from: National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1026.
60. Garrison L.P. The big picture: modeling right whales in space and time in The Urban Whale 2007, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, P. 460-87. S.D. Kraus, R.M. Rolland (Eds.).
61. Silber GK, Bettridge S, Cottingham D. Report of a workshop to identify and assess technologies to reduce ship strikes of large whales, 8-10 July, 2008, Providence, Rhode Island. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum 2009; NMFS-OPR-42; 55 p. Additional copies may be obtained from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr.
62. Baumgartner M.F., Mate B.R. Summer and fall habitat of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) inferred from satellite telemetry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2005, 62:527-543.
63. Mate B., Mesecar R., Lagerquist B. The evolution of satellite-monitored radio tags for large whales: one's laboratory experience. Deep-Sea Research II 2007, 54:224-247.
64. Kamino K. Diversified material designs in biological underwater adhesives. Structural interfaces and attachments in biology 2013, 9. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, p. 175-200.
65. Vanderlaan A.S.M., Corbett J.J., Green S.L., Callahan J.A., Wang C., Kenney R.D., et al. Probability and mitigation of vessel encounters with North Atlantic right whales. Endangered Species Research 2009, 6:273-285.
66. Wiley D.N., Thompson M., Pace R.M., Levenson J. Modeling speed restrictions to mitigate lethal collisions between ships and whales in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Biological Conservation 2011, 144:2377-2381.
67. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Finding for a petition to revise critical habitat for Northern right whales. Federal Register 11/19/2002; vol. 67 (223): p. 69708-10.
68. Fujiwara M., Caswell H. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature 2001, 414:537-541.
69. Lagueux K.M., Zani M.A., Knowlton A.R., Kraus S.D. Response by vessel operators to protection measures for right whales Eubalaena glacialis in the southeast US calving ground. Endangered Species Research 2011, 14:69-77.
70. Vanderlaan A.S.M., Taggart C.T. Vessel collision with whales: the probability of lethal injury based on vessel speed. Marine Mammal Science 2007, 231(1):144-156.
71. McKenna M.F., Katz S.L., Condit C., Walbridge S. Response of commericial ships to a voluntary speed reduction measure: are voluntary strategies adequate for mitigating ship-strike risk?. Coastal Manangement 2012, 40:634-650.
72. Moore M.J. Current issues facing North Atlantic right whales and stakeholders. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 2009, 36(2):309-317.