Testing the focal species approach to making conservation decisions for species persistence

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 19, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 530-540

  Nicholson, Emily ^a,b   Lindenmayer, David B ^c   Frank, Karin ^d   Possingham, Hugh P ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conservation planning; Extinction risk; Focal species; Indicator species; Metapopulation; Population viability analysis

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; EXTINCTION RISK; PERSISTENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES;

EID: 84877342497     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12066     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alexander, J.D., Seavy, N.E. & Hosten, P.E. (2007) Using conservation plans and bird monitoring to evaluate ecological effects of management: an example with fuels reduction activities in southwest Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management, 238, 375-383.
2. Andelman, S.J. & Fagan, W.F. (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 5954-5959.
3. Ball, S.J., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. (2003) The predictive accuracy of population viability analysis: a test using data from two small mammal species in a fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 2393-2413.
4. Beazley, K.F. & Cardinal, N. (2004) A systematic approach for selecting focal species for conservation in the forests of Nova Scotia and Maine. Environmental Conservation, 31, 91-101.
5. Berger, J. (1997) Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology, 11, 69-78.
6. Biedermann, R. (2003) Body size and area-incidence relationships: is there a general pattern? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 381-387.
7. Bowman, J., Jaeger, J.A.G. & Fahrig, L. (2002) Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology, 83, 2049-2055.
8. Branton, M. & Richardson, J.S. (2011) Assessing the Value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis. Conservation Biology, 25, 9-20.
9. Cabeza, M., Arponen, A. & Van Teeffelen, A. (2008) Top predators: hot or not? A call for systematic assessment of biodiversity surrogates. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 976-980.
10. Caro, T.M. (2003) Umbrella species: critique and lessons from East Africa. Animal Conservation, 6, 171-181.
11. Cook, R.R. & Hanski, I. (1995) On expected lifetimes of small-bodied and large-bodied species of birds on islands. American Naturalist, 145, 307-315.
12. Drechsler, M. (2004) Model-based conservation decision aiding in the presence of goal conflicts and uncertainty. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 141-164.
13. Drechsler, M. & Johst, K. (2010) Rapid viability analysis for metapopulations in dynamic habitat networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 1889-1897.
14. Favreau, J.M., Drew, C.A., Hess, G.R., Rubino, M.J., Koch, F.H. & Eschelbach, K.A. (2006) Recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of surrogate species approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 3949-3969.
15. Fleishman, E., Murphy, D.D. & Brussard, P.E. (2000) A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 10, 569-579.
16. Fleishman, E., Blair, R.B. & Murphy, D.D. (2001) Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications, 11, 1489-1501.
17. Frank, K. (2004) Ecologically differentiated rules of thumb for habitat network design - lessons from a formula. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 189-206.
18. Frank, K. & Wissel, C. (1998) Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival - from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management. Landscape Ecology, 13, 363-379.
19. Frank, K. & Wissel, C. (2002) A formula for the mean lifetime of metapopulations in heterogeneous landscapes. American Naturalist, 159, 530-552.
20. Hanski, I. (1998) Connecting the parameters of local extinction and metapopulation dynamics. Oikos, 83, 390-396.
21. Henle, K., Davies, K.F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C. & Settele, J. (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 207-251.
22. Hester, S.M., Cacho, O.J., Panetta, F.D. & Hauser, C.E. (2013). Economic aspects of post-border weed risk management. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 580-589.
23. Johnson, C.N., Vernes, K. & Payne, A. (2005) Demography in relation to population density in two herbivorous marsupials: testing for source-sink dynamics versus independent regulation of population size. Oecologia, 143, 70-76.
24. Keith, D.A., Akçakaya, H.R., Thuiller, W., Midgley, G.F., Pearson, R.G., Phillips, S.J., Regan, H.M., Araújo, M.B. & Rebelo, T.G. (2008) Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models. Biology Letters, 4, 560-563.
25. Keith, D.A., Martin, T.G., McDonald-Madden, E. & Walters, C. (2011) Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 144, 1175-1178.
26. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. & Vecchi, M.P. (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671-680.
27. Lambeck, R.J. (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 11, 849-856.
28. Lindenmayer, D.B. (2009) Large-scale landscape experiments: lessons from Tumut. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Lindenmayer, D.B. & Lacy, R.C. (2002) Small mammals, habitat patches and PVA models: a field test of model predictive ability. Biological Conservation, 103, 247-265.
30. Lindenmayer, D. & Likens, G. (2011) Direct measurement versus surrogate indicator species for evaluating environmental change and biodiversity loss. Ecosystems, 14, 47-59.
31. Lindenmayer, D.B., McCarthy, M.A. & Pope, M.L. (1999) Arboreal marsupial incidence in eucalypt patches in south-eastern Australia: a test of Hanski's incidence function metapopulation model for patch occupancy. Oikos, 84, 99-109.
32. Lindenmayer, D.B., Lacy, R.C. & Pope, M.L. (2000) Testing a simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecological Applications, 10, 580-597.
33. Lindenmayer, D.B., McCarthy, M.A., Possingham, H.P. & Legg, S. (2001) A simple landscape-scale test of a spatially explicit population model: patch occupancy in fragmented south-eastern Australian forests. Oikos, 92, 445-458.
34. Lindenmayer, D.B., Manning, A.D., Smith, P.L., Possingham, H.P., Fischer, J., Oliver, I. & McCarthy, M.A. (2002) The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conservation Biology, 16, 338-345.
35. Lindenmayer, D.B., Possingham, H.P., Lacy, R.C., McCarthy, M.A. & Pope, M.L. (2003) How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system. Ecology Letters, 6, 41-47.
36. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., MacGregor, C., Crane, M., Michael, D., Fischer, J., Montague-Drake, R., Felton, A. & Manning, A. (2008) Temporal changes in vertebrates during landscape transformation: a large-scale "natural experiment". Ecological Monographs, 78, 567-590.
37. Manne, L.L. & Williams, P.H. (2003) Building indicator groups based on species characteristics can improve conservation planning. Animal Conservation, 6, 291-297.
38. McCarthy, M.A., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. (2000) Testing spatial PVA models of Australian treecreepers (Aves: Climacteridae) in fragmented forest. Ecological Applications, 10, 1722-1731.
39. McCarthy, M.A., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. (2001) Assessing spatial PVA models of arboreal marsupials using significance tests and Bayesian statistics. Biological Conservation, 98, 191-200.
40. McCarthy, M.A., Andelman, S.J. & Possingham, H.P. (2003) Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis. Conservation Biology, 17, 982-989.
41. McCarthy, M.A., Thompson, C.J. & Williams, N.S.G. (2006) Logic for designing nature reserves for multiple species. American Naturalist, 167, 717-727.
42. Milner-Gulland, E.J., Shea, K., Possingham, H., Coulson, T. & Wilcox, C. (2001) Competing harvesting strategies in a simulated population under uncertainty. Animal Conservation, 4, 157-167.
43. Naujokaitis-Lewis, I.R., Curtis, J.M.R., Arcese, P. & Rosenfeld, J. (2009) Sensitivity Analyses of Spatial Population Viability Analysis Models for Species at Risk and Habitat Conservation Planning. Conservation Biology, 23, 225-229.
44. Nicholson, E. (2006) Planning for persistence: using the risk of extinction in multi-species approaches to conservation planning. PhD Thesis. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
45. Nicholson, E. & Possingham, H.P. (2006) Objectives for multiple-species conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 20, 871-881.
46. Nicholson, E. & Possingham, H.P. (2007) Making conservation decisions under uncertainty for the persistence of multiple species. Ecological Applications, 17, 251-265.
47. Nicholson, E., Westphal, M.I., Frank, K., Rochester, W.A., Pressey, R.L., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. (2006) A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Ecology Letters, 9, 1049-1060.
48. Peakall, R., Ebert, D., Cunningham, R. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2006) Mark-recapture by genetic tagging reveals restricted movements by bush rats (Rattus fuscipes) in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Zoology, 268, 207-216.
49. Possingham, H.P., Lindenmayer, D.B., Norton, T.W. & Davies, I. (1994) Metapopulation viability analysis of the greater glider Petauroides volans in a wood production area. Biological Conservation, 70, 227-236.
50. Regan, H.M., Hierl, L.A., Franklin, J., Deutschman, D.H., Schmalbach, H.L., Winchell, C.S. & Johnson, B.S. (2008) Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 462-471.
51. Roberge, J.-M. & Angelstam, P. (2004) Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology, 18, 76-85.
52. Sætersdal, M. & Gjerde, I. (2011) Prioritising conservation areas using species surrogate measures: consistent with ecological theory? Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 1236-1240.
53. Seddon, P.J. & Leech, T. (2008) Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria. Oryx, 42, 240-245.
54. Vos, C.C., Verboom, J., Opdam, P.F.M. & Ter Braak, C.J.F. (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist, 157, 24-41.
55. Watson, J., Freudenberger, D. & Paull, D. (2001) An assessment of the focal species approach for conserving birds in variegated landscapes in southeastern Australia. Conservation Biology, 15, 1364-1373.
56. Westphal, M.I. & Possingham, H.P. (2003) Applying a decision-theory framework to landscape planning for biodiversity: follow-up to Watson et al. Conservation Biology, 17, 327-330.
57. Whitmee, S. & Orme, C.D.L. (2012) Predicting dispersal distance in mammals: a trait-based approach. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 211-221.