A notation for the task-oriented modeling of business processes

International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 42-53

  Bruno, Giorgio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Business processes; Human decisions; Human tasks; Information systems; To do lists

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877302243     PISSN: 19473478     EISSN: 19473486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jhcitp.2012070104     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alter, S. (2008). Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 448-469. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.37
2. Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Bellotti, V, Dalal, B., Good, N., Flynn, P., Bobrow, D. G., & Ducheneaut, N. (2004). What a to-do: Studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 735-742). New York, NY: ACM.
4. Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). Process-aware information systems: Bridging people and software through process technology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/0471741442
5. Goedertier, S., Haesen, R., & Vanthienen, J. (2008). Rule-based business process modelling and enactment. International J ou rnal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3, 194-207. doi: 10.1504/IJBPIM.2008.023219
6. Grebner, O., & Riss, U. (2008). Implicit metadata generation on the semantic desktop using task management as example. In Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Ontologie s Me et Industry (pp. 33-44). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
7. Hull, R. (2008). Artifact-centric business process models: brief survey of research results and challenges. In R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Eds.), Proceedings of the Confederated International Conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (LNCS 5332, pp. 1152-1163).
8. th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (LNCS 5074, pp. 32-47).
9. th International Conference on Business Process Modeling Development and Support (Vol. 29, pp. 197-210).
10. th International Conference on Business Process Management (LNCS 4714, pp. 165-181).
11. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., & Governatori, G. (2009). On managing business processes variants. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 68(7), 642-664. doi: 10.1016/j. datak.2009.02.009
12. Luckham, D. (2002). The power of events: An introduction to complex event processing in distributed enterprise systems. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
13. Marjanovic, O., & Freeze, R. D. (2011). Knowledge intensive business processes: Theoretical foundations and research challenges. In Proceedings of the IEEE 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
14. Nurcan, S. (2008). A survey on the flexibility requirements related to business processes and modeling artifacts. In Proceedings of the IEEE 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 378). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
15. OMG. (2008). Semantics of business vocabulary and business rules, V.1.0(SBVR). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/
16. OMG. (2010). Object constraint language, V.2.3.1 (OCL). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/
17. OMG. (2011). Business processmodel and notation, V.2.0 (BPMN). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/
18. Paton, N. W., & Díaz, O. (1999). Active database systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(1), 63-103. doi: 10.1145/311531.311623
19. Pesic, M. van der Aalst, & W. M. P. (2006). A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In J. Eder & S. Dustdar (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Business Process Management (LNCS 4103, pp. 169-180).
20. Riss, U. V, Rickayzen, A., Maus, H., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2005). Challenges for business process and task management. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management, 0(2), 77-100.
21. th International Conference on Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design (LNCS 4849, pp. 213-226).
22. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Pesic, M., & Schonenberg, H. (2009). Declarative workflows: balancing between flexibility and support. Computer Science - Research for Development, 23(2), 99-113.
23. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weske, M., & Grünbauer, D. (2005). Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 53(2), 129-162. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2004.07.003
24. Weske, M. (2007). Business process management - Concepts, languages, architectures. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
25. Yongchareon, S., & Liu, C. (2010). A process view framework for artifact-centric business processes. In R. Meersman, T. Dillon, & P. Herraro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Confederated International Conferences on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (LNCS 6426, pp. 26-43).
26. zur Muehlen, M., & Indulska, M. (2010). Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis. Information Systems, 35, 379-390. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2009.02.006