GIS database development and exchange: Interaction mechanisms and motivations

Spatial Data Infrastructures in Context: North and South

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 69-100

  Nedović Budić, Zorica ^a   Pinto, Jeffrey K ^b   Warnecke, Lisa ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b Department of Management Information Systems   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION;

COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT; FINANCIAL RESOURCES; INFORMAL INTERACTIONS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL; INTERACTION MECHANISMS; ORGANIZATIONAL BOUNDARIES; SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 84877295641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Azad, B., and L. L. Wiggins, 1995, Dynamics of Inter-Organizational Geographic Data Sharing: A Conceptual Framework for Research. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 22-43. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
2. Calkins, H. W., and R. Weatherbe, 1995, Taxonomy of Spatial Data Sharing. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 65-75. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
3. Campbell, H. J., and I. Masser, 1991, The Impact of GIS on Local Government in Great Britain. Proceedings of the Association for Geographic Information Conference, London: AGI.
4. Croswell, P. L., 1991, Obstacles to GIS Implementation and Guidelines to Increase the Opportunities for Success. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 3, no. 1: 43-56.
5. Dedekorkut, A., 2002, What Makes Collaborations Work? An Empirical Assessment of Determinants of Success in Interorganizational Collaboration. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Conference of ACSP, Baltimore, Maryland, November 21-24, 2002.
6. Dilman, D. A., 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York:Wiley-Interscience.
7. Dueker, K. J., 1987, Multipurpose Land Information Systems: Technical, Economic, and Institutional Issues. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 53, no. 10: 1361-1365.
8. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), 1994, Development of a National Digital Geospatial Data Framework. Status Report from the Framework Working Group. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), 2002, NSGIC/FGDC Framework Survey; http://www.fgdc.gov/framework/framework.html
9. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), 2003, Geospatial One-Stop; http://www.geo-one-stop.gov/
10. Feick, R. D., and G. B. Hall. 1999, Consensus-Building in a Multi-Participant Spatial Decision Support System. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 11(2): 17-23.
11. Frank, A. U. 1992, Acquiring a Digital Base Map-A Theoretical Investigation Into a Form of Sharing Data. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 4(1): 10-23.
12. Greenwald, M. J. 2000, Beyond City Limits: The Multi-Jurisdictional Applications of GIS. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 12(1): 31-43.
13. Haithcoat, T., L. Warnecke, and Z. Nedović-Budić, 2001, Geographic Information Technology in Local Government: Experience and Issues. The Municipal Year Book 2001. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
14. Harvey, F., 2001a, Constructing GIS: Actor Networks of Collaboration. URISA Journal 13, no. 1: 29-37.
15. Harvey, F., 2001b, NSDI from the Trenches-Local Government Perspective. Geospatial Solutions 11, no. 5: 2-4.
16. Knaap, G. and Z. Nedović-Budić, 2003, Assessment of Regional GIS Capacity for Transportation and Land Use Planning. Project report (draft) to the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, U.S. HUD, and U.S. DOT. College Park, MD:University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth and Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Urban and Regional Planning. www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/budic/W-metroGIS.htm
17. Kumar, K., and H. G. van Dissel, 1996, Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly 20, no. 3: 279-300.
18. Masser, I., and H. J. Campbell, 1995, Information Sharing: The Effects of GIS on British Local Government. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 230-249. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
19. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 2001, Organizational (Soft) GIS Interoperability:Lessons from the U.S. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 3, no. 3: 290-298.
20. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 2000, Information Sharing in an Interorganizational GIS Environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27, 455-474.
21. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 1999a, Understanding Interorganizational GIS Activities: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information System Association (URISA) 11, no. 1: 53-64.
22. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 1999b, Interorganizational GIS: Issues and Prospects. Annals of Regional Science 33, 183-195.
23. Obermeyer, N. J., 1995, Reducing Inter-Organizational Conflict to Facilitate Sharing Geographic Information. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 138-148. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
24. O’Toole, L. J., Jr., and R. S. Montjoy, 1984, Interorganizational Policy Implementation:A Theoretical Perspective. Public Administration Review, Nov/Dec: 491-505.
25. Pinto, J. K., and B. Azad, 1994, The Role of Organizational Politics in GIS Implementation. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 6, no. 2: 35-61.
26. Pinto, J. K., and H. J. Onsrud, 1995, Sharing Geographic Information across Organizational Boundaries: A Research Framework. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 44-64. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
27. Pinto, M. B., J. K. Pinto, and J. E. Prescott, 1993, Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-functional Cooperation. Management Science 39, 1281-1297.
28. Roche, S., and J. B. Humeau, 1999, GIS Development and Planning Collaboration: A Few Examples from France. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) 11, no. 1: 5-14.
29. Sperling, J., 1995, Development and Maintenance of the TIGER Database: Experiences in Spatial Data Sharing at the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Sharing Geographic Information, eds. H. J. Onsrud, and G. Rushton, 377-96. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
30. Thompson, J., 1967, Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Tulloch, D., and J. Fuld, 2001, Exploring County-level Production of Framework Data: Analysis of the National Framework Data Survey. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 13, no. 2: 11-21.
32. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2002, The National Map, http://www.nationalmap.usgs.gov/index.html
33. Warnecke, L., 1999, Geographic Information Technology Institutionalization in the Nation’s States and Localities. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 65 (11), 1257-1268.
34. Warnecke, L., J. Beattie, K. Cheryl, W. Lyday, and S. French, 1998, Geographic Information Technology in Cities and Counties: A Nationwide Assessment. Washington, DC:American Forests.