Organizational (soft) GIS interoperability: Lessons from the U.S.

ITC Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 290-298

  Nedovic Budic, Zorica ^a   Pinto, Jeffrey K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b BEHREND COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordination; Data information sharing; Geographic information systems (GIS); Implementation; Interoperability

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644511895     PISSN: 03032434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0303-2434(01)85035-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Albrecht, Johan, 1999. Towards interoperable geo-information standards: a comparison of reference models for geo-spatial information. The Annals of Regional Science 33: 151-169.
2. Antenucci, John C., Kay Brown, Peter L. Croswell & Michael J. Kevany (with Hugh Archer) 1991. Geographic Information Systems - A Guide to the Technology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
3. Bishr, Yaser A., 1998. Overcoming semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 12(4): 299-314.
4. Bishr, Yaser A., H. Pundt, W. Kuhn & M. Radwan, 1999. Probing the concept of information communities - a first step toward semantic interoperability. In: M. Goodchild, M. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas & C. Kottman (Eds), Interoperating Geographic Information Systems, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 165-180.
5. Burrough, P. & I. Masser, 1998. European Geographic Information Infrastructures. Taylor & Francis, London.
6. Craglia, Massimo & Paola Signoretta, 2000. From global to local: the development of local geographic information strategies in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning B 27: 777-788.
7. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), 2001. (http://www.fgdc.gov).
8. Frank, Steven M., Michael F. Goodchild, Harlan J. Onsurd & Jeffrey P. Johnson, 1996. User requirements for framework geospatial data. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 8(2): 38-50.
9. Frederick, Doyle, 1995. Coordination of surveying, mapping, and related spatial data activities. In: H.J. Onsrud & G. Rushton (Eds), Sharing Geographic Information, Rutgers State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 355-362.
10. GeoData Alliance, 2000. Organizational design. Final Drafting Team Report, (http://www.geoall.net/).
11. Haithcoat, Timothy, Lisa Warnecke & Zorica Nedovic-Budic, 2001. Geographic information technology in local government: Experiences and issues. The Municipal Year Book 2001. International City/County Management Association, Washington DC, pp. 47-57.
12. Harvey, Francis, Werner Kuhn, Hardy Pundt, Yaser Bishr & Catharina Riedemann, 1999. Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information. The Annals of Regional Science 33: 213-232.
13. Harvey, Francis, 2000. Potentials and pitfalls for vertical integration for the NSDI. Final Report of a Survey of Local Government Perspectives. (http://www.uky.edu/AS/Geography/ppnsdi/reports/reports.htm).
14. Harvey, Francis, 2001 a. Constructing GIS: actor networks of collaboration. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 13(1): 29-37.
15. Harvey, Francis, 2001b. NSDI from the trenches - local government perspectives. Geospatial Solutions 5: 2-4.
16. Huffman, Lisa A. & Gwen Hall, 1998. Use of innovative technology applications in local government. International City/County Management Association, Washington, DC, Special Data Issue, No. 1.
17. Johnson, Jeffrey P., 1995a. Information policy for local government geographic information systems: adoption, implementation and results. Master's Thesis. University of Maine, Orono, ME.
18. Johnson, Jeffrey P., 1995b. Case studies of dissemination policy in local government GIS agencies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 19: 373-390.
19. Johnson, Randall, Z. Nedovic-Budic & K. Covert, 2001. Lessons from Practice A Guidebook to Organizing and Sustaining Geodata Collaboratives. GeoData Alliance, Reston, VA.
20. Kumar, K. & H.G. van Dissel, 1996. Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly 20(3): 279-300.
21. Lopez, Xavier R., 1996. Stimulating GIS innovation through distribution of geographic information. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 8(2): 24-37.
22. Masser, I., 1998. Governments and Geographic Information. Taylor & Francis, London.
23. Mish, F.C. (Ed.), 1993. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition. Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA.
24. National Academy of Public Administration, 1998. Geographic information for the 21st century - building a strategy for the nation. National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC.
25. Nedovic-Budic, Zorica & Jeffrey K. Pinto, 1999a. Understanding interorganizational GIS activities: a conceptual framework. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 11(1): 53-64.
26. Nedovic-Budic, Zorica & Jeffrey K. Pinto, 1999b. Interorganizational GIS: issues and prospects. Annals of Regional Science 33: 183-195.
27. Nedovic-Budic, Zorica & Jeffrey K. Pinto, 2000. Information sharing in an interorganizational GIS environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27:455-474.
28. Nedovic-Budic, Zorica & Jeffrey Pinto, 2001. Summaries of survey results. (http://www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/budic/W-NSF-2.html; username: "znbguest"; password: "views").
29. Onsrud, Harlan J. & Gerald Rushton (Eds), 1995. Sharing geographic information. Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ.
30. Onsrud, Harlan J., Jeffrey P. Johnson & Judy Winnecki, 1996. GIS dissemination policy: two surveys and a suggested approach. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 8(2): 8-23.
31. Onsrud, Harlan J., 2001. Survey of national and regional SDI activities around the globe. (http://www.spatial.maine.edu/̃onsrud/GSDI.htm).
32. Ritchie, Liesel, Stephen A. Barlow & John T. Forbes, 1998. 1998 National County Spatial Information Technology Survey Results. Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
33. Roche, Stephane & Jean-Baptiste Humeau, 1999. GIS development and planning collaboration: a few examples from France. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 11(1): 5-14.
34. Somers, Rebecca, 1999. Framework data survey - preliminary report. Geolnfo Systems September issue.
35. Tulloch, David & Jennifer Fuld, in press. Exploring county-level production of framework data: analysis of the National Framework Survey. Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 13(2): 11-21.
36. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1999. 1997 Census of Governments, Volume 1: Government Organization. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
37. van Biesen, K.T., 2001. Models of national GI association in Europe. EUROGI (http://www.eurogi.org).
38. Warnecke, Lisa (with John M. Hohnson, Karen Marshall & R. Steven Brown), 1992. State Geographic Information Activities Compendium. Council of State Governments, Lexington, KY.
39. Warnecke, Lisa, Cheeryl Kollin, Jeff Beattie & Winifred Lyday, 1998. Geographic information technology in cities and counties: a nationwide assessment. American Forests, Washington, DC.
40. Warnecke, Lisa, 1999. Geographic information technology institutionalization in the nation's states and localities. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 65(11): 1257-1268.