Genres of communication in activist eparticipation: A comparison of new and old media

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 48-57

  Johannessen, Marius Rohde ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Eparticipation; Genre theory; Public sphere; Social media

Indexed keywords

E-PARTICIPATION; GENRE THEORY; OFFLINE; SOCIAL MEDIA; USAGE PATTERNS;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84877283150     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2463728.2463740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Macintosh, A., A. McKay-Hubbard, and D. Shell, Using Weblogs to Support Local Democracy, in E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy 2005. p. 1-12.
2. Tambouris, E., N. Liotas, and K. Tarabanis, A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2007: Hawaii.
3. Jackson, N.A. and D.G. Lilleker, Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 2009. 6(3): p. 232-250.
4. Gray, M. and M. Caul, Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997. Comparative Political Studies, 2000. 33(9): p. 1091-1122.
5. Østerud, Ø., F. Engelstad, and P. Selle, Makten og demokratiet. En sluttbok fra makt- og demokratiutredningen 2003, Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk. 344.
6. Sæbø, Ø., J. Rose, and L. Skiftenes Flak, The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 2008. 25(3): p. 400-428.
7. Brandtzæg, P.B. and M. Lüders, eCitizen 2.0: The Ordinary Citizen as a Supplier of Public Sector Information, 2008, Ministry for Government and Administration Reform: Oslo.
8. Papacharissi, Z., The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere. New Media and Society, 2002. 4(1): p. 9-27.
9. Gimmler, A., Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2001. 27(4): p. 21-39.
10. Yates, J. and W.J. Orlikowski, Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. The Academy of Management Review, 1992. 17(2): p. 299-326.
11. Orlikowski, W.J. and J. Yates, Genre Repetoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994. 39(4): p. 541-74.
12. Shepherd, M. and C. Watters. The evolution of cybergenres. in System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on. 1998.
13. Dahlberg, L., The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 2001. 4(4): p. 615 - 633.
14. Habermas, J., The Public Sphere, in Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A reader, S. Seidman, Editor 1989, Beacon Press: Boston.
15. Frazer, E., The Problem of Communitarian Politics. Unity and Conflict 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Castells, M., The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008. 616(1): p. 78-93.
17. Merriman, J., A history of modern Europe: From the French Revolution to the Present. Vol. 2. 1996, New York: W.W Norton & Company.
18. Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeoise society 1991, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
19. Webster, F., Information Management and Manipulation: Jürgen Habermas and the Decline of the Public Sphere, in Theories of the Information Society 1995, Routledge: London.
20. Dahlgren, P., The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 2005. 22: p. 147-162.
21. Poster, M., Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the Public Sphere, in Internet Culture, D. Porter, Editor 1997, Routledge: New York/London.
22. Gibson, R.K., W. Lusoli, and S. Ward, Online Participation in the UK: Testing a 'Contextualised' Model of Internet Effects1. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2005. 7(4): p. 561-583.
23. Tewksbury, D., The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2005. 49(3): p. 332-348.
24. Calhoun, C., Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 1998. 68(3): p. 373-397.
25. Muhlberger, P., Human Agency and the Revitalization of the Public Sphere. Political Communication, 2005. 22(2): p. 163-178.
26. Habermas, J., Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research1. Communication Theory, 2006. 16(4): p. 411-426.
27. Trenz, H. and K. Eder, The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere. European Journal of Social Theory, 2004. 7(1): p. 5-25.
28. Johannessen, M.R., Social Capital and the Networked Public Sphere: Implications for Political Social Media sites, in The Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-45)2012: Maui, Hawaii, USA.
29. Putnam, R.D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 2000, New York: Simon & Schuster.
30. Svendsen, G.T. and G.L.H. Svendsen, Social Kapital - en introduction 2006, København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
31. Ahuja, S., M.A. Pèrez-Quiñones, and A. Kavanaugh, Local conversations 2.0, in Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government 2009, Digital Government Society of North America.
32. Yang, S., H. Lee, and S. Kurnia, Social Capital in Information and Communications Technology Research: Past, Present and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2009. 25: p. 183-221.
33. Ellison, N.B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. 12(4): p. 1143-1168.
34. Pasek, J., E. More, and D. Romer, Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking meets Offline Civic Engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2009. 6(3&4): p. 197-215.
35. Turnšek, M., "The Digital Youth Revolt?" Young People and eParticipation, in Understanding eParticipation: Contemporary PhD eParticipation research in Europe, A. Avdic, et al., Editors. 2008, Örebro University Library: Örebro.
36. Päivärinta, T. and Ø. Sæbø, The Genre System Lens on E-Democracy. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2008. 20(2).
37. Sæbø, Ø., Understanding Twitter Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis, in Electronic Participation, E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and H. de Bruijn, Editors. 2011, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. p. 1-12.
38. Sæbø, Ø. and T. Päivârinta, Autopoietic cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre analysis of a web-based discussion board, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2005.
39. Johannessen, M., Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2009 Norwegian Parliamentary Election, in Electronic Participation, E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and O. Glassey, Editors. 2010, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. p. 104-114.
40. Yoshioka, T., et al., Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 2001. 19(4): p. 431-456.
41. Yates, J. and W. Orlikowski, Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms. Journal of Business Communication, 2002. 39(1): p. 13-35.
42. Kaplan, B. and J. Maxwell, Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems, in Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems, J. Anderson and C. Aydin, Editors. 2005, Springer New York. p. 30-55.
43. Marshall, C. and G. Rossman, Designing Qualitative Researh: 3rd Edition 1999, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Benbasat, I., D.K. Goldstein, and M. Mead, The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 1987. 11(3): p. 369-386.
45. Cresswell, J.W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods approach 2009, Los Angeles: Sage.
46. Walsham, G., Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 2006. 15(3): p. 320-330.