Feasibility of a nursing rehabilitation guideline for patients with stroke: Evaluating the use by nurses

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 939-949

  Hafsteinsdóttir, Thóra B ^a,b,c,d   Varekamp, Rudi ^c,e   Rensink, Marijke ^b   Van Linge, Roland ^a,b,c   Lindeman, Eline ^a,f   Schuurmans, Marieke ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Evidence based care; Feasibility study; Nursing; Rehabilitation nursing; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION NURSING; SOCIOECONOMICS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION NURSING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STROKE;

EID: 84877149067     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.721049     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bots ML, Berger-van Stijl M, Jager-Geurts MH, Bos M, Reitsma JB, Breteler MMB, de Bruin A. Incidence of cerebrovasculaire diseases in the Netherlands. In: Jager-Geurts MH, Peters RJG, Bots ML, editors. Cardiovascular diseases in the Netherlands [in Dutch: Harten Vaatziekten in Nederland in Nederland], Den Haag. Den Haag: Nederlandse Hartstichting; 2006. pp 35-56.
2. Sackett D, Staus S, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
3. Cullum N. Users' guides to the nursing literature: an introduction. Evid Based Nurs 2000;3:71.
4. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Hameling BC, Kollen BJ, Hobbelsen JSM, Buurke JH et al. Clinical Practice Guideline in Physiotherapy-management of patients wiht stroke [in Dutch: KNGF-richtlijn Beroerte] Netherlands. Tijdschrif voor Fysiotherapie 2004;114(5; suppl.):1-78.
5. Dutch Institute for Health-care Improvements. [in Dutch: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg Utrecht CBO] Stroke Guidelines [in Dutch CBO-richtlijn Beroerte]. Den Haag: Nederlands Hartstichting; 2007.
6. Commissie CVA revalidatie. Rehabilitation afer a stroke, guidelines and recommendations for health care professionals [in Dutch: Revalidatie na een beroerte: richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverlener]. In: Franke EAM, editor. Den Haag: Dutch Heart Foundation [In Dutch: Nederlandse Hartstichting]; 2001.
7. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN). Management of patients with stroke, rehabilitation, prevention and managent of complications and discharge planning-a national clinical guideline (no. 64). Edinburg: SIGN; 2002. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk
8. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Post Stroke Rehabilitation: clinical Practice guideline. No 16. Rockville: AHCPR; 1995.
9. Royal College of Physicians-Intercollegiate working party for stroke. National Clinical Guidelines for stroke. London: 1999.
10. Wit Lde, Puman K, Dejaeger E, Baert I, Berman P, Bogaerts K, Brinkmann N, Connell L, Feys H, Jenni W, Kaske C, Lesafre E, Leys M, Lincoln N, Louckx F, Schuback B, Schupp W, Smith B, de Weerdt W. Use of time by stroke patients. A comparison of four European revalidation centers. Stroke 2005;36:1977-1983.
11. Huijben-Schoenmakers M, Gamel C, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Filling up the hours: how do stroke patients on a rehabilitation nursing home spend the day? Clin Rehabil 2009;23:1145-1150.
12. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Schuurmans MM. Clinical Nursing Rehabilitation Stroke-Guideline [in Dutch: Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte. Maarsen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg; 2009. Available from: http://www. elseviergezondheidszorg.nl/
13. Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration. Br J Cancer 2003;89(Suppl 1):S4-S8.
14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
15. Agree collaboration (2000). Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation: AGREE instrument. Available from: http://www.agreecollaboration.org
16. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Mäkelä M, Zaat J; AGREE Collaboration. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:31-45.
17. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694-696.
18. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) (2008). A guideline developers handbook SIGN 50. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50. pdf
19. Dutch Institute for Health-care Improvements. [in Dutch: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg Utrecht CBO] (2007) Evidence-based Richtlijnontwikkeling. Available from: http://www.cbo. nl/product/richtlijnen/ handleiding-ebro/handl-totaal.pdf/view
20. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, et al. for the QUOROM group. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analy-sis of randomized controlled trials: Te QUOROM statement. Lancet 1994;354:1896e900.
21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Te Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-1457.
22. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900.
23. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing research: methods, critical appraisal and utilization. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.
24. Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdóttir T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation afer stroke: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:737-754.
25. de Man-van Ginkel JM, Gooskens F, Schuurmans MJ, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdottir TB; Rehabilitation Guideline Stroke Working Group. A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for poststroke depression and the role of nurses. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:3274-3290.
26. Korpershoek C, van der Bijl J, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Self-efcacy and its infuence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2011;67:1876-1894.
27. Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Vergunst M, Lindeman E, Schuurmans M. Educational needs of patients with a stroke and their caregivers: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:14-25.
28. Poslawsky IE, Schuurmans MJ, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. A systematic review of nursing rehabilitation of stroke patients with aphasia. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:17-32.
29. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classifcation (NIC). IOWA Intervention Project, 3rd edition. St Louis: Mosby; 2000. p 19.
30. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008-1015.
31. Commission for legitimating guidelines in nursing, V&VN, the Netherlands. (2008). Available from: http://www.venvn.nl/OverVVN/Vereniging/ CommissieLegitimeringRichtlijnen/tabid/1852/Accessed 2008 October.
32. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-65.
33. Wolfe CD, Taub NA, Woodrow EJ, Burney PG. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients. Stroke 1991;22:1242-1244.
34. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede JL. Te Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 1999;15:116-122.
35. Guigoz Y, Lauque S, Vellas BJ. Identifying the elderly at risk for malnutrition. Te Mini Nutritional Assessment. Clin Geriatr Med 2002;18:737-757.
36. Tsai AC, Shih CL. A population-specifc Mini-Nutritional Assessment can efectively grade the nutritional status of stroke rehabilitation patients in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:82-88.
37. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:227-236.
38. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Inform Syst Res 1991;192-222.
39. Rogers EM. Difusion of innovation, 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
40. Linge van RH. Innovation in the health care: theory, clinical practice and research [Innoveren in de gezondheidszorg: Teorie, praktijk en Onderzoek]. Maarssen: Elsevier; 2006.
41. Buwalda IJ. Adoption of functional diference in health care: a research into the infuence of organisational culture, personal values and innovation characteristics on adoping an innovation [in Dutch: Adoptie van functie diferentiatie. Onderzoek naar de invloed van orgnisatiecultuur, persoonlijke waarden en innovatiekenmerken op de adoptie van een innovatie] [Dissertation]. Utrecht University, 2006.
42. Milisen K, Geeraerts A, Dejaeger E; Scientifc Working Party, Uniform Approach for Fall Prevention in Flanders. Use of a fall prevention practice guideline for community-dwelling older persons at risk for falling: a feasibility study. Gerontology 2009;55:169-178.
43. Mayou R, Welstand J, Tyndel S. Setting up and auditing guideline-and evidence-based cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005;4:23-28.
44. Resnick B, Quinn C, Baxter S. Testing the feasibility of implementation of clinical practice guidelines in long-term care facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004;5:1-8.
45. Breen A, Carr E, Mann E, Crossen-White H. Acute back pain management in primary care: a qualitative pilot study of the feasibility of a nurse-led service in general practice. J Nurs Manag 2004;12:201-209.
46. Bamford O, Gibson F. Te clinical nurse specialist: perceptions of practising CNSs of their role and development needs. J Clin Nurs 2000;9:282-292.
47. Mills N, Campbell R, Bachmann MO. Professional and organizational obstacles to establishing a new specialist service in primary care: case study of an epilepsy specialist nurse. J Adv Nurs 2002;37:43-51.
48. Karkos B, Peters K. A Magnet community hospital: Fewer barriers to nursing research utilization. J Nurs Adm 2006;36:377-382.
49. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, Uomoto JM, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Burridge AB. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:10-15.
50. Rasmussen HH, Kondrup J, Staun M, Ladefoged K, Lindorf K, Jørgensen LM, Jakobsen J, et al. A method for implementation of nutritional therapy in hospitals. Clin Nutr 2006;25:515-523.
51. Choi-Kwon S, Yang YH, Kim EK, Jeon MY, Kim JS. Nutritional status in acute stroke: undernutrition versus overnutrition in diferent stroke subtypes. Acta Neurol Scand 1998;98:187-192.
52. Hackett ML, Yapa C, Parag V, Anderson CS. Frequency of depression afer stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2005;36:1330-1340.
53. Kumlien S, Axelsson K. Te nursing care of stroke patients in nursing homes. Nurses' descriptions and experiences relating to cognition and mood. J Clin Nurs 2000;9:489-497.
54. Quiros D, Lin S, Larson EL. Attitudes toward practice guidelines among intensive care unit personnel: a cross-sectional anonymous survey. Heart Lung 2007;36:287-297.
55. McCloskey DJ. Nurses' perceptions of research utilization in a corporate health care system. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008;40:39-45.
56. Fink R, Tompson CJ, Bonnes D. Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. J Nurs Adm 2005;35:121-129.
57. Lohr KN. Te quality of practice guidelines and the quality of health-care. In: Selbman HK editor. Guidelines in Health-care. Report of a WHO-conference. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgeschellschaf; 1998: pp 42-52.
58. Bradley F, Wiles R, Kinmonth AL, Mant D, Gantley M. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). Te SHIP Collaborative Group. BMJ 1999;318:711-715.