A study of the SME Technology Roadmapping Program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1002-1014

  Jun, Seung Pyo ^a   Seo, Ju Hwan ^a   Son, Jong Ku ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

R D planning; Roadmapping program; SME innovation policy; Structural Equation Model; Technology roadmap

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS; INNOVATION POLICIES; ROADMAPPING; SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPPING; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS;

INDUSTRY;

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

KOREA;

EID: 84877134755     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA) Research results on the current conditions of small and medium enterprises December 2011.
2. NABO (National Assembly Budget Office) Evaluation of the technology innovation development program for small and medium enterprises May 2009.
3. Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA) 2010 policy on developing small and medium enterprises September 2009.
4. Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA) Draft five year plan for technology innovation among small and medium enterprises August 2009.
5. Garcia M.L., Bray O.H. Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Sandia National Laboratories, report SAND97-0665 April 1997.
6. Willard C.H., McClees C. Motorola's technology roadmap process. Res. Manage. 1987, 30:13-19.
7. Holmes C., Ferrill M. The application of Operation and Technology Roadmapping to aid Singaporean SMEs identify and select emerging technologies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2005, 72:349-357.
8. Kappel T.A. Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2001, 18:39-50.
9. Phaal R., Farrukh C., Probert D. T-Plan. The Fast Start to Technology Roadmapping. Planning Your Route to Success 2001, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Mill Lane, Cambridge, UK.
10. Industry Canada Evaluating technology roadmaps - a framework for monitoring and measuring results 2007.
11. SAIT (Samsung Advanced Istittute of Technology) Scenario-baesd technology roadmap 2006.
12. SIMTech(Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology) Operation and technology raodmapping (OTR). Presentaion 2010.
13. Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA) Advance planning research on SME Technology Roadmapping December 2007.
14. Holmes C.J., Ferrill M.B.A., Phaal R. Reasons for roadmapping: a study of the Singaporean SME manufacturing sector, engineering management conference. Proceedings 2004 IEEE International 2004, vol. 1:292-296.
15. Waffelaert P. Chemical exchange program analysis. Sand Report Sep. 2007.
16. Quinn J.B. Key policy issues posed by services. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1988, 34(4):405-423.
17. Schreiber J.B., Stage F.K., King J., Nora A., Barlow E.A. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J. Educ. Res. 2006, 99(6):323-337.
18. Oliveira M.G., Rozenfeld H. Integrating technology roadmapping and portfolio management at the front-end of new product development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77:1339-1354.
19. Pohl H., Yarime M. Integrating innovation system and management concepts: the development of electric and hybrid electric vehicles in Japan. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 14 May 2012, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.012.
20. Salo A. Exploring causal relationships in an innovation program with Robust Portfolio Modeling. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(8):1028-1044.
21. Harman A.J. Industrial innovation and governmental policy: a review and proposal based on observation of the U.S. electronic sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1980, 18(1):15-37.
22. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation for structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 23(4):272-277.
23. Pai F.Y., Huang K.I. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:650-660.
24. Byrne B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SMPLIS 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
25. Gefen D., Keil M. The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 1998, 29(2):35-49.
26. Hairs J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 5th ed.