Left/right neck rotation judgments are affected by age, gender, handedness and image rotation

Manual Therapy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 225-230

  Wallwork, Sarah B ^a   Butler, David S ^a,b   Fulton, Ian ^a   Stewart, Halton ^b   Darmawan, Igusti ^c   Moseley, G Lorimer ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b Neuro Orthopaedic Institute   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Body schema; Laterality; Left right judgments; Motor imagery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GENDER; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE ROTATION; IMAGERY; MALE; MENTAL MOVEMENT; MOTOR IMAGERY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NECK ROTATION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RESPONSE TIME; ROTATION; SCHOOL CHILD; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; ROTATION; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84877128048     PISSN: 1356689X     EISSN: 15322769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bray H., Moseley G.L. Disrupted working body schema of the trunk in people with back pain. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2011, 45:168-173.
2. Daly A.E., Bialocerkowski A.E. Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult complex regional pain syndrome type one? A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2009, 13(4):339-353.
3. Dey A., Barnsley N., Mohan R., McCormick M., McAuley J.H., Moseley G.L. Are children who play a sport or a musical instrument better at motor imagery than children who do not?. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2012, 46:923-926.
4. Fejer R., Kyvik K.O., Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. European Spine Journal 2006, 15:834-848.
5. Gunturkun O. Human behaviour: adult persistence of head-turning asymmetry. Nature 2003, 421(6924):711.
6. Hammond G.A. Set-theoretical requirement for nonphysical specificity in embodied evaluations of physical models of mind. Medical Hypotheses 1995, 45(1):15-16.
7. Harris L.J., Fitzgerald H.E. Lateral cradling preferences in men and women: results from a photographic study. The Journal of General Psychology 1985, 112(2):185-189.
8. Hoving J.L., Gross A.R., Gasner D., Kay T., Kennedy C., Hondras M.A., et al. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine 2001, 26(2):196-205.
9. Hudson M.L., McCormick K., Zalucki N., Moseley G.L. Expectation of pain replicates the effect of pain in a hand laterality recognition task: bias in information processing toward the painful side?. European Journal of Pain 2006, 10(3):219-224.
10. Jackson C.J., Furnham A., Miller T. Moderating effect of ear preference on personality in the prediction of sales performance. Laterality: asymmetries of body. Brain and Cognition 2001, 6(2):133-140.
11. Jackson P.L., Lafleur M.F., Malouin F., Richards C., Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001, 82(8):1133-1141.
12. Jordan K., Wustenberg T., Heinze H.-J., Peters M., Jancke L. Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(13):2397-2408.
13. Konishi Y., Kuriyama M., Mikawa H., Suzuki J. Effect of body position on later postural and functional lateralities of preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1987, 29(6):751-757.
14. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(2):287-394.
15. Leaver A.M., Refshauge K.M., Maher C.G., McAuley J.H. Conservative interventions provide short-term relief for non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 2010, 56:73-85.
16. Light K.E., Spirduso W.W. Effects of adult aging on the movement complexity factor of response programming. The Journal of Gerontology 1990, 45(3):107-109.
17. Luchies C.W., Schiffman J., Richards L.G., Thompson M.R., Bazuin D., DeYoung A.J. Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2002, 57(4):M246-M249.
18. McCormick K., Zalucki N., Hudson M.L., Moseley G.L. Faulty proprioceptive information disrupts motor imagery: an experimental study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2007, 53(1):41-45.
19. Mead L.A., Hampson E. A sex difference in turning bias in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 1996, 78(2):73-79.
20. Moseley G., Butler D., Beames T., Giles T. The graded motor imagery handbook 2012, Noigroup Publishing, Adelaide, 121.
21. Moseley G., Gallagher L., Gallace A. Neglect-like tactile dysfunction in chronic back pain. Neurology 2012, 79(4):327-332.
22. Moseley G.L. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Pain 2004, 108(1-2):192-198.
23. Moseley G.L. Why do people with complex regional pain syndrome take longer to recognize their affected hand?. Neurology 2004, 62(12):2182-2186.
24. Moseley G.L. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain - a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2006, 67(12):2129-2134.
25. Moseley G.L., Brugger P. Interdependence of movement and anatomy persists when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(44):18798-18802.
26. Moseley G.L., Gallace A., Spence C. Space-based, but not arm-based, shift in tactile processing in complex regional pain syndrome and its relationship to cooling of the affected limb. Brain 2009, 132(11):3142-3151.
27. Moseley G.L., Gallace A., Spence C. Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2012, 36:34-46.
28. Nico D., Daprati E., Rigal F., Parsons L., Sirigu A. Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain 2004, 127(1):120-132.
29. Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2002, 6(1):101-115.
30. Parsons L.M. Imagined spatial transformations of ones hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19(2):178-241.
31. Parsons L.M. Mental simulation of ones action. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1990, 28(6):513.
32. Parsons L.M. Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychologica 2001, 107(1-3):155-181.
33. Parsons L.M., Fox P.T. The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998, 15(6-8):583-615.
34. Parsons L.M., Gabrieli J.D.E., Phelps E.A., Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebrally lateralized mental representations of hand shape and movement. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(16):6539-6548.
35. Porac C., Cohen S. The dominant eye. Psychological Bulletin 1976, 83(5):880-897.
36. Putnam S.M.C.F.H. Direction and reliability of head tilt in humans. Laterality 1996, 1(2):153-160.
37. Richardson J. Gender differences in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1994, 78:435-448.
38. Saimpont A., Pozzo T., Papaxanthis C. Aging affects the mental rotation of left and right hands. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(8).
39. Schwoebel J., Coslett H.B., Bradt J., Friedman R., Dileo C. Pain and the body schema: effects of pain severity on mental representations of movement. Neurology 2002, 59(5):775-777.
40. Schwoebel J., Friedman R., Duda N., Coslett H.B. Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain 2001, 124(Pt 10):2098-2104.
41. Ververs I.A.P., Devries J.I.P., Vangeijn H.P., Hopkins B. Prenatal head position from 12-38 weeks .1. Developmental aspects. Early Human Development 1994, 39(2):83-91.