Corporate sustainability ratings: An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 35, Issue , 2012, Pages 79-92

  Searcy, Cory ^a   Elkhawas, Doaa ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Corporate sustainability; Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI); Socially responsible investment (SRI); Sustainability indices; Sustainability ratings

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

BACKGROUND INFORMATION; CANADA; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CORPORATE-SUSTAINABILITY; DATA REQUESTS; SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS; SUSTAINABILITY INDEX; SUSTAINABILITY REPORT;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84877122655     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adam, A.M., Shavit, T., 2008. How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in CSR? Journal of Business Ethics 82, 899-905.
2. Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., Walker, J., 2010. The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance 50 (1), 31-51.
3. Azapagic, A., 2004. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (6), 639-662.
4. Bansal, P., Roth, K., 2000. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43 (4), 717-736.
5. Bartels, W., Iansen-Rogers, J., Kuszewski, J., 2008. Count Me In: The Readers' Take on Sustainability Reporting, KPMG and Sustainability. Available online: (accessed 22.03.12.). https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/ Count-Me-In-The-Readers-take-on-Sustainability-Reporting.pdf.
6. Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., Frame, B., 2009. Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 22 (4), 588-625.
7. Beloe, S., Scherer, J., Knoepfel, I., 2004. Values for Money: Reviewing the Quality of SRI Research, first ed. SustainAbility, London.
8. Beloe, S., Elkington, J., Hester, K.F., Loose, M., Zollinger, P., 2006. Tomorrow's Value: The Global Reporters 2006 Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting. SustainAbility, London.
9. Berthelot, S., Coulmont, M., Serret, V., in press. Do investors value sustainability reports? A Canadian study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, doi:10.1002/csr.285.
10. Brown, H.S., de Jong, M., Levy, D.L., 2009. Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (6), 571-580.
11. Buhr, N., 2007. Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O'Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. Routledge, UK, pp. 57-69
12. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), 2011. Chronology of CICA Sustainability Initiatives. Available online: (accessed 07.12.11.). http://www.cica. ca/research-and-guidance/sustainability/item13546.pdf.
13. Cerin, P., Dobers, P., 2001. What does the performance of the Dow Jones Sustain-ability Group Index tell us? Eco-Management and Auditing 8 (3), 123-133.
14. Chatterji, A., Levine, D., 2006. Breaking down the wall of codes: evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review 48 (2), 29-51.
15. Chatterji, A., Toffel, M.W., 2010. How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal 31 (9), 917-945.
16. Chatterji, A., Levine, D., Toffel, M.W., 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 (1), 125-169.
17. Consolandi, C., Dale, A., Poggiani, E., Vercelli, A., 2009. Global standards and ethical stock indexes: the case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1), 185-197.
18. Crosby, P.B., 1979. Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
19. Daub, C.-H., 2007. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 75-85. (Pubitemid 44429945)
20. Davis, G., Searcy, C., 2010. A review of Canadian corporate sustainable development reports. Journal of Global Responsibility 1 (2), 316-329.
21. Deegan, C., 2007. Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O'Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. Routledge, UK, pp. 127-149.
22. Delmas, M., Blass, V.D., 2010. Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment 19, 245-260.
23. Dillenburg, S., Greene, T., Erekson, H., 2003. Approaching socially responsible investment with a comprehensive ratings scheme: total social impact. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 167-177. (Pubitemid 38103959)
24. Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI), 2011a. Dow Jones Sustainability North America Indexes (Version 5.6). Available online: (accessed 07.12.11.). http://www.sustainability-index.com/djsi-pdf/publications/Guidebooks/DJSI-NA- Guidebook-5-6-final.pdf
25. DJSI, 2011b. Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. Available online: (accessed 08.12.11.). http://www.sustainability-index.com/07-htmle/indexes/djsi. html.
26. DJSI, 2011c. DJSI Brochure. Available online: http://www.sustainability- index.com/djsi-pdf/publications/DJSI-Brochure-2011.pdf.
27. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K., 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 130-141. (Pubitemid 34268282)
28. Elkington, J., 1998. Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers, Stony Creek, CT.
29. Flick, U., 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, fourth ed. Sage, London, UK.
30. Fowler, S., Hope, C., 2007. A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (3), 243-252.
31. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., De Colle, S., 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
32. Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
33. Gallego, I., 2006. The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13, 78-97. (Pubitemid 43828912)
34. Gotsi, M., Wilson, A.M., 2001. Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6 (1), 24-30.
35. Gray, R., Herremans, I.M., 2012. Sustainability and social responsibility reporting and the emergence of the external social audits: the struggle for accountability? In: Bansal, P., Hoffman, A.J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment. Oxford University Press, UK, pp. 405-424.
36. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 2006. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Version 3.0. GRI, Amsterdam.
37. Keeble, J., Topiol, S., Berkeley, S., 2003. Using indicators to measure sustainability performance at a corporate and project level. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3), 149-158. (Pubitemid 38097355)
38. Kelley, H.H., 1973. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28 (2), 107-128.
39. Knoepfel, I., 2001. Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: a global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8 (1), 6-15.
40. Kolk, A., 2004. A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 3 (1), 51-64. (Pubitemid 38852031)
41. Kolk, A., 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 18, 1-15. (Pubitemid 351176178)
42. Kolk, A., 2010. Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business 45 (4), 367-374.
43. Krajnc, D., Glavic, P., 2005. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability? Ecological Economics 55 (4), 551-563. (Pubitemid 41571283)
44. Krippendorff, K., 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, California.
45. Lamberton, G., 2005. Sustainability accounting-a brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum 29 (1), 7-26. (Pubitemid 40517528)
46. Lopez, M., Garcia, A., Rodriguez, L., 2007. Sustainable development and corporate performance: a study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (3), 285-300.
47. Magness, V., 2010. Environmental disclosure in the mining industry: a signaling paradox? In: Freedman, M., Jaggi, B. (Eds.), Sustainability, Environmental Performance and Disclosures Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, vol. 4. Emerald, UK, pp. 55-81.
48. Matten, D., Moon, J., 2008. Implicit and explicit CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33 (2), 404-424.
49. Nordheim, E., Barrasso, G., 2007. Sustainable development indicators of the European aluminum industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (3), 275-279. (Pubitemid 44441907)
50. O'Rourke, A., 2003. The message and methods of ethical investment. Journal of Cleaner Production 11, 683-693.
51. Palme, U., Tillman, A., 2008. Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities? Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (13), 1346-1357. (Pubitemid 351787859)
52. Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., Larceneux, F., 2011. How sustainability ratings might deter 'greenwashing': a closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics 102, 15-28.
53. Perrini, F., 2005. Building a European portrait of corporate social responsibility reporting. European Management Journal 23 (6), 611-627. (Pubitemid 43092194)
54. Ratanajongkol, S., Davey, H., Low, M., 2006. Corporate social reporting in Thailand: the news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 3 (1), 67-83.
55. Rea, L.M., Parker, R.A., 2005. Designing and Conducting Survey Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.
56. Roca, L.C., Searcy, C., 2012. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 20 (1), 103-118.
57. Sadowski, M., Whitaker, K., Buckingham, F., 2010a. Rate the Raters: Phase One e Look Back and Current State. SustainAbility, London, UK.
58. Sadowski, M., Whitaker, K., Buckingham, F., 2010b. Rate the Raters: Phase Two-Taking Inventory of the Ratings Universe. SustainAbility, London, UK.
59. Sadowski, M., Whitaker, K., Ayars, A., 2011a. Rate the Raters: Phase Three e Uncovering Best Practices. SustainAbility, London, UK.
60. Salzmann, O., Somers, A., Steger, U., 2005. The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European Management Journal 23 (1), 27-36. (Pubitemid 40251073)
61. Scalet, S., Kelly, T.F., 2010. CSR rating agencies: what is their global impact? Journal of Business Ethics 94, 69-88.
62. Searcy, C., McCartney, D., Karapetrovic, S., 2007. Sustainable development indicators for the transmission system of an electric utility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14 (3), 135-151. (Pubitemid 47020277)
63. Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K.I., 2009. Sustainability reporting in Greece: are we there yet? Environmental Quality Management 19 (1), 43-59.
64. Slater, A., 2008. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008. KPMG Global Sustainability Services, The Netherlands.
65. Sobhani, F.A., Amran, A., Zainuddin, Y., 2009. Revisiting the practices of corporate social and environmental disclosure in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16, 167-183.
66. Sparkes, R., Cowton, C.J., 2004. The maturing of socially responsible investment: a review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 45-57. (Pubitemid 39064206)
67. Stiller, Y., Daub, C.-H., 2007. Paving the way for sustainable communication: evidence from a Swiss study. Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 474-486. (Pubitemid 350041874)
68. Suchman, M.C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 571-610.
69. Swaen, V., Vanhamme, J., 2005. The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: does source credibility matter? Advances in Consumer Research 32 (1), 590-591.
70. Upham, J., Mills, N., 2005. Environmental and operational sustainability of airports. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12 (2), 166-179.
71. Van de Ven, B., 2008. An ethical framework for the marketing of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2), 339-352.
72. Van Marrewijk, M., 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustain-ability: between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2), 95-105. (Pubitemid 38097351)
73. Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M., 2001. Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9 (6), 519-549. (Pubitemid 32922979)
74. Vormedal, I., Ruud, A., 2009. Sustainability reporting in Norway-an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (4), 207-222.
75. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2002. t. Sustainable Development Reporting: Striking the Balance. World Business Council for Sustainable Developmen, Geneva.
76. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
77. Weber, M., 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal 26, 247-261.
78. Willis, A., 2003. The role of the global reporting initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3), 233-237.
79. Windolph, S.E., 2011. Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability 1 (1), 61-80.