Social network analysis of patent infringement lawsuits

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 944-955

  Kim, Hyoungshick ^a   Song, JaeSeung ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b NEC LABORATORIES EUROPE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mobile industry; Network analysis; Patent analysis

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; MOBILE INDUSTRY; NETWORK CENTRALITIES; PATENT ANALYSIS; PATENT INFRINGEMENTS; PATENT PORTFOLIO; SAMSUNG; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

COMMERCE; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SIGNAL ENCODING; SMARTPHONES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

INDUSTRY;

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; MOBILE COMMUNICATION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 84877110946     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kenney M., Pon B. Structuring the smartphone industry. Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key?, Discussion Papers 1238 2011, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
2. Carl von Clausewitz H.w.G. Principles of War, by Carl Von Clausewitz, Bodley Head 1943.
3. Brin S., Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Proceedings of the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference 1998, 30:107-117.
4. Sidiropoulos A., Manolopoulos Y. A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries. Inf. Process. Manage. Int. J. 2005, 41:289-312.
5. Clarkson G., Dekorte D. The problem of patent thickets in convergent technologies. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1093:180-200.
6. Li X., Chen H., Zhang Z., Li J. Automatic patent classification using citation network information: an experimental study in nanotechnology. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, JCDL'07 2007, 419-427. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
7. Hack Griffith Smartphone Patent Wars - Network Patent Analysis 2011.
8. Yoon B.-U., Yoon C.-B., Park Y.-T. On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Manage. 2002, 32:291-300.
9. Shin J., Park Y. Generation and application of patent claim map: text mining and network analysis. J. Intellect. Prop. Rights 2005, 10:198-205.
10. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2006, 73:981-1012.
11. Choi C., Kim S., Park Y. A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: the case of information and communication technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2007, 74:1296-1314.
12. Huang S.-H., Ke H.-R., Yang W.-P. Structure clustering for Chinese patent documents. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34:2290-2297.
13. Bergmann I., Butzke D., Walter L., Fuerste J.P., Moehrle M.G., Erdmann V. Evaluating the risk of patent infringement by means of semantic patent analysis: the case of DNA chips. R&D Manage. 2008, 38:550-562.
14. Patel D., Ward M.R. Using patent citation patterns to infer innovation market competition. Res. Policy 2011, 40:886-894.
15. He Z.-L., Lim K., Wong P.-K. Entry and competitive dynamics in the mobile telecommunications market. Res. Policy 2006, 35:1147-1165.
16. Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econ. Lit. 1988, 26:1120-1171.
17. Cohen W.M., Levin R.C. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization 1989, 2:1059-1107. Elsevier.
18. Aspden H. Patent statistics as a measure of technological vitality. World Patent Inf. 1983, 5:170-173.
19. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos 1989, 42:171-180.
20. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. 1990, 28:1661-1707.
21. Napolitano G., Sirilli G. The patent system and the exploitation of inventions: results of a statistical survey conducted in Italy. Technovation 1990, 10:5-16.
22. Freeman C., Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation 1997, The MIT Press. 3rd edition.
23. Bresman H., Birkinshaw J., Nobel R. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1999, 30:439-462.
24. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J. Econ. 1990, 21:172-187.
25. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q. J. Econ. 1993, 108:577-598.
26. Harhoff D., Narin F., Scherer F.M., Vopel K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1999, 81:511-515.
27. Barberá-Tomás D., Jiménez-Sáez F., Castelló-Molina I. Mapping the importance of the real world: the validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks. Res. Policy 2011, 40:473-486.
28. Michel J., Bettels B. Patent citation analysis: a closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 2001, 51:185-201.
29. Lee C., Cho Y., Seol H., Park Y. A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2011, 79:16-29.
30. Carpenter M.P., Narin F., Woolf P. Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Inf. 1981, 3:160-163.
31. Narin F., Elliot N., Ross P. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy 1987, 16:143-155.
32. Albert M.B., Avery D., Narin F., McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy 1991, 20:251-259.
33. Karki M.M.S. Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Inf. 1997, 19:269-272.
34. Boccaletti S., Latora V., Moreno Y., Chavez M., Hwang D. Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys. Rep. 2006, 424:175-308.
35. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks 2010, Princeton University Press. M.E.J. Newman, A.L. Barabási, D.J. Watts (Eds.).
36. Guimerà R., Mossa S., Turtschi A., Amaral L.A.N. The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102:7794-7799.
37. Borgatti S.P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks 2005, 27:55-71.
38. Sternitzke C., Bartkowski A., Schramm R. Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools. World Patent Inf. 2008, 30:115-131.
39. Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 2001, 25:163-177.
40. Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 1972, 2:113-120.
41. Brass D., Burkhardt M. Centrality and power in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Theory and Practice 1993, 191-215. N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.).
42. Powell S. Accounting for intangible assets: current requirements, key players and future directions. Eur. Account. Rev. 2003, 12:797-811.
43. McDonough J.F. The myth of the patent troll: an alternative view of the function of patent dealers in an idea economy. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series 2007.
44. MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1967, 1:281-297. University of California Press.
45. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Networks Analysis 1994, Cambridge University Press.
46. Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics 1990, Wiley.
47. IDC Group Research Report, Technical Report 2012.
48. Bessen J., Meurer M.J. The Patent Litigation Explosion, Working Papers, Research on Innovation 2005.